Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAXENA, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by ERIKSSON, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 27 | Number 4 | Pages 843-852 | 1986
© Oxford University Press 1986


research-article

Phase Equilibria in the Pyroxene Quadrilateral

S. K. SAXENA1, JULIA SYKES1 and G. ERIKSSON2

1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, CUNY, Graduate Center and Department of Geology, Brooklyn College Brooklyn, New York 11210
2Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Umea S-95187 Sweden

Received April 23, 1985; Revised typescript accepted November 19, 1985

ABSTRACT

Experimental phase equilibrium data on compositions of coexisting pyroxenes in the quadrilateral enstatite-diopside-ferrosilite-hedenbergite have been used to model pyroxene solid solutions and to formulate pyroxene geothermometers. Each pyroxene is treated as a solid solution of four quad-components using the Kohler formulation


Formula

where {Delta}Gij* is the excess free energy of mixing in a binary solution calculated with binary mole fractions (e.g. Xio = Xi/(Xi+Xj)) and Xi is the mole fraction in a multicomponent solution. The fit to the experimental data is achieved by minimizing the total Gibbs free energy of the assemblage. The following set of thermochemical data and simple mixture parameters (Wij) are found to be best suited. Standard (T = 298·15 K) enthalpy and entropy of formation from elements for fictive orthohedenbergite are –1416·8 kJ and 84·88 J K–1 mol –1 respectively. The heat capacity is given by 114·67+17·09E-3T–31·40E5T–2. The Wij data are: Opx: W12 = W21 = 25 W13 = (13·1–0-015T), W31 = (3·37–0·005T), W23 = 20, W32 = 16, W24 = 5, W42 = 7, W34 = 15, W43 = 15; Cpx: W12 = (25·484+0·0812P), W21 =(31·216–0·0061P), W31 = W13 = 0W14 = (93·3–0·045T), W41 = (–20·0+0·028T), W23 = 24, W32 = 15, W24 = 12, W42 = 12, W34 = (16·941+0·00592P), W43 = (20·697–0·00235P). Coexisting pyroxene compositions have been computed in the temperature range of 700 to 1400°C.

Two geothermometers have been constructed, one based on atomic fraction of iron (Fe/(Fe + Mg)) in orthopyroxene and the Fe-Mg distribution coefficient and the other, based on wollastonite content of clinopyroxene. The two scales yield different temperatures when applied to the same rock. In igneous pyroxenes, the Ca transfer ceased at 150 to 200°C above the closure temperature of the Fe-Mg ion-exchange. In metamorphic rocks an opposite effect seems to have prevailed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
E. J. Essene
The current status of thermobarometry in metamorphic rocks
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 1989; 43(1): 1 - 44.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.