Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COLLERSON, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by SHERATON, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 27 | Number 4 | Pages 853-886 | 1986
© Oxford University Press 1986


research-article

Age and Geochemical Characteristics of a Mafic Dyke Swarm in the Archaean Vestfold Block, Antarctica: Inferences about Proterozoic Dyke Emplacement in Gondwana

KENNETH D. COLLERSON1,1 and JOHN W. SHERATON2

1Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia
2Bureau of Mineral Resources P.O. Box 378, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, Australia

Received June 28, 1985; Revised typescript accepted December 2, 1985

ABSTRACT

Archaean gneisses in the Vestfold Block, Antarctica are cut by abundant tholeiite and rare alkaline dykes. At least five generations of dykes have been recognized on the basis of intrusive relationships, petrography and geochemistry. Rb-Sr isotopic data indicate that intrusion of the tholeiites occurred over a period of c. 1000 Ma, during three clearly defined events (viz. c. 2400, 1800, and 1400 Ma). Dykes in the southwestern part of the Vestfold Block were recrystallized during a late Proterozoic (c. 1000-1100 Ma) high-grade event. Mineral-whole rock Rb-Sr isotopic data show that the terrain was also variably affected by an even younger thermal event c. 500 Ma ago which is correlated with the Pan-African Orogeny.

Isotopic, major element and trace element data suggest that the tholeiite dyke suites were derived by varying degrees of partial melting of compositionally distinct, in some cases rather heterogeneous subcontinental mantle source regions, combined with variations in the extent and nature of crystal fractionation. Extensive crustal contamination does not appear to have played a significant role in determining compositional trends within the different suites, although minor contamination cannot be discounted. The oldest dykes, a diverse group of high-Mg tholeiites, and the youngest, c. 1400 Ma tholeiites, appear to have been derived from isotopically similar source regions, which were nevertheless characterized by quite different abundances of highly incompatible elements (Pb, Rb, Ba, Th, K, La, and Ce). 1800 Ma tholeiites were derived from a more radiogenic mantle source region, characterized by long-term enrichment in incompatible elements. Such enrichment is interpreted to be a consequence of metasomatism of their mantle source region.

2400 Ma high-Mg dykes in Enderby Land have virtually identical chemical and isotopic compositions to those in the Vestfold Block, indicating generation from a similar source region; however, 1200 Ma tholeiites were apparently derived from a more radiogenic source region like that of the c. 1800 Ma Vestfold Block dykes. Hence, both Sr isotopic and geochemical data indicate that the ancient subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath Gondwana was extremely heterogeneous.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. Suzuki, H. Ishizuka, and H. Kagami
Early to middle Proterozoic dykes in the Mt. Riiser-Larsen area of the Napier Complex, East Antarctica: tectonic implications as deduced from geochemical studies
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 308(1): 195 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.