Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CAMPBELL, I. H.
Right arrow Articles by TURNER, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 30 | Number 4 | Pages 885-923 | 1989
© Oxford University Press 1989


research-article

Fountains in Magma Chambers

IAN H. CAMPBELL and J. S. TURNER

Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia

Received April 26, 1988; Revised October 19, 1988; ABSTRACT

Cyclic layering is a common feature of the ultramafic zone of layered intrusions and is usually attributed to the entry of new pulses of dense magma into the chamber. Since the crystallization of olivine and bronzite lowers the density of the magma, a new pulse of the parent magma will be denser than the fractionated magma in the chamber. If the new pulse enters with excess momentum it will initially rise up into the host magma to form a fountain, then fall back around the feeder when negative buoyancy forces overcome the initial momentum of the pulse. Laboratory experiments using aqueous solutions with both point and line sources have been conducted to obtain a quantitative understanding of the fluid-dynamical processes that are important in fountains. It is observed that convection within the fountain is highly turbulent, resulting in appreciable entrainment of the host magma. A gravity-stratified hybrid layer develops at the floor and this breaks up into a series of double-diffusive convecting layers if the new pulse is hotter than the host magma. The number of layers that form depends on a number of factors, especially R{rho}, the ratio of the contributions of composition and heat to the total density difference between the host magma and the new pulse. Raising the value of R{rho}, results in the formation of more, thinner layers.

The thickness of the hybrid layer at any time t is given by H = h0+(V0/A)t where V0 is the volume flux through the feeder and A is the horizontal area of the chamber. h0 is related to the initial steady-state height of the fountain and, for a line source, is given by h0=CU04/3 d–1(g{delta}{rho}/{rho})–2/3 where U0 is the volume flux per unit length, g is the acceleration due to gravity, d is the width of the feeder, {rho} is the density of the host magma, {delta}{rho} is the density difference between the magmas and C is a constant.

Calculations based on these results and the consideration of the flow in the feeder dykes below the chamber indicate that a fountain will rise at least 350 m in a continental magma chamber if the feeder width is greater than 10 m. This will lead to extensive mixing between the new pulse and the fractionated magma in the chamber, producing a zoned hybrid layer at the floor that is commonly over 1000 m thick. If the chamber receives many pulses of dense magma, the resulting zoning may persist throughout much of the life of the chamber, especially if the first pulse to enter becomes contaminated by light magma released by melting at the margins. The highest Mg/Fe ratio for olivine and pyroxenes from cyclic units from the ultramafic zones of layered intrusions is often well below the value expected for minerals crystallizing from a melt derived directly from the mantle, supporting the hypothesis that new pulses of dense magma can mix extensively with the fractionated magma in the chamber.

The feeder dykes to some oceanic magma chambers, such as the Bay of Islands Ophiolite, are believed to be narrower, so that fountains do not rise more than a few metres above the floor of the chamber. This restricts mixing between the input magma and the host magma and can result in the formation of a hybrid zone that is only a few metres thick.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
G. SVERRISDOTTIR
Hybrid magma generation preceding Plinian silicic eruptions at Hekla, Iceland: evidence from mineralogy and chemistry of two zoned deposits
Geological Magazine, July 1, 2007; 144(4): 643 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
M. BAN, K. TAKAHASHI, T. HORIE, and N. TOYA
Petrogenesis of Mafic Inclusions in Rhyolitic Lavas from Narugo Volcano, Northeastern Japan
J. Petrology, August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1543 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
T. KURITANI, T. YOKOYAMA, K. KOBAYASHI, and E. NAKAMURA
Shift and Rotation of Composition Trends by Magma Mixing: 1983 Eruption at Miyake-jima Volcano, Japan
J. Petrology, October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1895 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
F. COSTA and B. SINGER
Evolution of Holocene Dacite and Compositionally Zoned Magma, Volcan San Pedro, Southern Volcanic Zone, Chile
J. Petrology, August 1, 2002; 43(8): 1571 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Economic GeologyHome page
C. A. Spier, C. A. Spier, and C. F. Ferreira Filho
The Chromite Deposits of the Bacuri Mafic-Ultramafic Layered Complex, Guyana Shield, Amapa State, Brazil
Economic Geology, July 1, 2001; 96(4): 817 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
F. J. Tepley III, J. P. Davidson, and M. A. Clynne
Magmatic Interactions as Recorded in Plagioclase Phenocrysts of Chaos Crags, Lassen Volcanic Center, California
J. Petrology, May 1, 1999; 40(5): 787 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
M. A. Clynne
A Complex Magma Mixing Origin for Rocks Erupted in 1915, Lassen Peak, California
J. Petrology, January 1, 1999; 40(1): 105 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.