Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wyllie, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 38 | Number 9 | Pages 1113-1135 | 1997
© Oxford University Press 1997

Liquid Immiscibility in the Join NaAlSiO4—NaAlSi3O8—CaCO3 at 1 GPa: Implications for Crustal Carbonatites

Woh-Jee Lee* and Peter J. Wyllie

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Received November 8, 1996; Revised typescript accepted April 11, 1997


   Abstract

The synthetic system Na2O–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–CO2 has been widely used as a model to show possible relationships among alkalic silicate magmas, calciocarbonatites, and natrocarbonatites. The determined immiscibility between silicate- and carbonate-rich liquids has been strongly advocated to explain the formation of natural carbonatite magmas. Phase fields intersected at 1.0 GPa by the composition joins NaAlSiO3O8–CaCO3 (Ab–CC, published) and NaAlSiO4(Ne)90Ab10–CC (new), along with measured immiscible liquid compositions, provide pseudoternary phase relationships for the composition triangles Ab–CC–Na2CO3(NC) and Ne90Ab10–CC–NC. Interpolation between these, and extrapolation within the CO2-saturated tetrahedron Al2O3–SiO2–CaO–Na2O, provides pseudoquaternary phase relationships defining the volume for the miscibility gap and the surface for the silicate–carbonate liquidus field boundary. The miscibility gap extends between 10 and 70 wt % CaCO3 on the triangle Ne–Ab–CC at 1.0 GPa; it does not extend to the Na2O-free side of the tetrahedron. The liquidus minerals in equilibrium with both silicate- and carbonate-rich consolute liquids are nepheline, plagioclase, melitite, and wollastonite; with increasing Si/Al the liquidus for calcite reaches the miscibility gap. We use these phase relationships to: (1) illustrate possible paths of crystallization of initial CO2-bearing silicate haplomagmas, (2) place limits on the compositions of immiscible carbonatite magmas which can be derived from silicate parent magmas, and (3) illustrate paths of crystallization of carbonatite magmas. Cooling silicate–CO2 liquids may reach the miscibility gap, or the silicate–calcite liquidus field boundary, or terminate at a eutectic precipitating silicates and giving off CO2. Silicate–CO2 liquids can exsolve liquids ranging from CaCO3–rich to alkalic carbonate compositions. There is no basis in phase relationships for the occurrence of calciocarbonatite magmas with ~99 wt % CaCO3; carbonate liquids derived by immiscibility from a silicate–CO2 parent (at crustal pressures) contain a maximum of 80 wt % CaCO3. There are two relevant paths for a silicate liquid which exsolves carbonate-rich liquid (along with silicate mineral precipitates): (1) the assemblage is joined by calcite, or (2) the assemblage persists without carbonate precipitation until all silicate liquid is used up. The phase diagrams indicate that high-temperature immiscible carbonate-rich liquids must be physically separated from parent silicate liquid before they can precipitate carbonate-rich mineral assemblages. Path (1) then corresponds to the silicate–calcite liquidus field boundary, and a stage is reached where the carbonate–rich liquids will precipitate large amounts of calcite and fractionate toward alkali carbonates (not necessarily matching natrocarbonatite compositions). In path (2) the high-temperature immiscible carbonate liquid precipitates only silicates through a temperature interval until it reaches the silicate–carbonate liquidus field boundary, where it may precipitate calcite or nyerereite or gregoryite. Sövites are readily explained as cumulates, with residual alkali-rich melts causing fenitization. We can see no way in phase diagrams for vapor loss to remove alkalis and change immiscible natrocarbonatite liquids to CaCO3–rich liquids; adjustments to vapor loss would be made not by change in liquid composition but by precipitation of calcite and silicate minerals. The processes illustrated in this model system are applicable to a wide range of magmatic conditions, and they complement and facilitate interpretation of phase relationships in the single paths represented by each whole- rock phase euilibrium study.

KEY WORDS: calciocarbonatite; join NaAlSiO4–NaAlSi3O8–CaCO3; liquid immiscibility; natrocarbonatite


* Corresponding author: Telephone: (626)-395-6239. Fax: (626)-568-0935. e-mail: wjl{at}gps.caltech.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society of America Special PapersHome page
R. K. Srivastava and A. K. Sinha
Nd and Sr isotope systematics and geochemistry of a plume-related Early Cretaceous alkaline-mafic-ultramafic igneous complex from Jasra, Shillong plateau, northeastern India
Geological Society of America Special Papers, January 1, 2007; 430(0): 815 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
P. J. Wyllie and W.-J. Lee
Model System Controls on Conditions for Formation of Magnesiocarbonatite and Calciocarbonatite Magmas from the Mantle
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 1885 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
W. G. Minarik
Complications to Carbonate Melt Mobility due to the Presence of an Immiscible Silicate Melt
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 1965 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
U. Kramm and S. Sindern
Nd and Sr Isotope Signatures of Fenites from Oldoinyo Lengai, Tanzania, and the Genetic Relationships between Nephelinites, Phonolites and Carbonatites
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 1997 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
W.-J. Lee and P. J. Wyllie
Processes of Crustal Carbonatite Formation by Liquid Immiscibility and Differentiation, Elucidated by Model Systems
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 2005 - 2013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
I. V. Veksler, T. F. D. Nielsen, and S. V. Sokolov
Mineralogy of Crystallized Melt Inclusions from Gardiner and Kovdor Ultramafic Alkaline Complexes: Implications for Carbonatite Genesis
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 2015 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
A. F. Cooper and D. L. Reid
Nepheline Sovites as Parental Magmas in Carbonatite Complexes: Evidence from Dicker Willem, Southwest Namibia
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 2123 - 2136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
W.-J. Lee and P. J. Wyllie
Petrogenesis of Carbonatite Magmas from Mantle to Crust, Constrained by the System CaO-(MgO + FeO*)-(Na2O + K2O)-(SiO2 + Al2O3 + TiO2)-CO2
J. Petrology, March 1, 1998; 39(3): 495 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.