Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cawthorn, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Walraven, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 39 | Number 9 | Pages 1669-1687 | 1998
© Oxford University Press 1998

Emplacement and Crystallization Time for the Bushveld Complex

R. Grant Cawthorn1,* and Feodor Walraven2

1 Department of Geology, University of the Witwatersrand PO Wits, 2050, South Africa
2 924 Keyter Street, Daspoort, 0082, South Africa

Received July 20, 1997; Revised typescript accepted April 16, 1998


  Abstract

The Bushveld Complex formed by the crystallization of successive injections of magma, which were sufficiently closely spaced in time that each previous magma had not cooled and differentiated significantly before the addition of the next one. To constrain the emplacement and crystallization times, a thermal model is presented which permits the investigation of the rate of cooling of magma in an intrusion repeatedly subjected to magma addition (and subtraction). Such modelling indicates that magmas injected into the Bushveld Complex were emplaced within 75 000 years. At that time injection into the Complex ceased. The volume of rock in the Eastern and Western limbs is 370 000–600 000 km3. However, a quantitative evaluation of the Cr budget in the formation of chromitite layers indicates that large volumes of magma cannot be accounted for in the preserved rock sequence. Similarly, an evaluation of the incompatible trace-element abundances, such as those for Zr and K, suggests that the chamber was open and that large volumes of differentiated magma escaped. The volume of magma therefore greatly exceeded the preserved volume of cumulate rocks, giving an estimated magma volume of over 1 x 106 km3. An average emplacement rate of 13 km3/year is indicated by these calculations.

KEY WORDS: Bushveld Complex; differentiation; magma emplacement rates; multiple intrusion; tapping of magma

* Corresponding author.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PetrologyHome page
R. G. Cawthorn and L. D. Ashwal
Origin of Anorthosite and Magnetitite Layers in the Bushveld Complex, Constrained by Major Element Compositions of Plagioclase
J. Petrology, September 1, 2009; 50(9): 1607 - 1637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Geological Society of America MemoirsHome page
C. Thiart and M. J. de Wit
Fingerprinting the metal endowment of early continental crust to test for secular changes in global mineralization
Geological Society of America Memoirs, January 1, 2006; 198(0): 53 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.