Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SPEAR, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by FLORENCE, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 43 | Number 11 | Pages 2097-2120 | 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Metamorphic, Thermal, and Tectonic Evolution of Central New England

FRANK S. SPEAR1,*, M. J. KOHN2, JOHN T. CHENEY3 and F. FLORENCE4

1DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE, TROY, NY 12180, USA
2DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA, COLUMBIA, SC 29208, USA
3DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, AMHERST COLLEGE, AMHERST, MA 01002, USA
4SCIENCE DIVISION, JEFFERSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE, WATERTOWN, NY 13601, USA

A new, detailed tectonic model is presented for the Acadian orogenic belt of central New England (Vermont and New Hampshire) that accounts for a wide range of petrological and structural observations. Three belts are considered: the Eastern Vermont, Merrimack, and intervening Bronson Hill belts. Specific observations in eastern Vermont that are accounted for in the model include the following. P–T paths are clockwise with maximum pressures near the Athens, Chester, and Strafford domes of 8–11 kbar, but with maximum pressures decreasing to 3–5 kbar at the boundary with the Bronson Hill belt. Differential exhumation of the Vermont domes relative to the rocks in easternmost Vermont is required by the recorded differences in maximum pressure (5–6 kbar; 15–20 km) and the present-day geographical separation (7–10 km). Specific observations in New Hampshire that are explained include the following. P–T paths in the Merrimack belt are counter-clockwise with maximum pressures of 4–5 kbar and are related to high regional heat flow and heat transfer by early Acadian plutons. P–T paths in the Bronson Hill belt are intimately associated with structural position. An early contact metamorphism is evidenced in the Skitchewaug and Fall Mountain nappes near contacts with the early Acadian Bethlehem gneiss (~400–410 Ma). Peak metamorphic temperature rises upwards in the nappe sequence (an inverted metamorphic sequence) whereas peak pressures decrease. Near-simultaneous intrusion of the Bethlehem gneiss and Kinsman quartz monzonite is required to account for the low-P, high-T metamorphism observed in the Chesham Pond and Fall Mountain nappes. The dominant schistosity, which is related to isoclinal folding, postdates early contact metamorphism in the Fall Mountain and Skitchewaug nappes, and pre-dates peak metamorphism and isothermal loading in the Fall Mountain, Skitchewaug and Big Staurolite nappes. Reactivation of this fabric during thrusting is recorded in some rocks of the Big Staurolite nappe by rotated garnets that grew during near-isothermal loading. Only the sillimanite isograd crosses the Fall Mountain–Skitchewaug nappe boundary. Metamorphic breaks across the Skitchewaug–Big Staurolite nappe boundary, at the base of the Big Staurolite nappe, and at the margin of the Keene and Alstead domes require post-metamorphic thrusting when P–T conditions were in the greenschist facies. These observations can be explained by a relatively simple model involving in-sequence thrusting from east to west commencing in central New Hampshire at 400–410 Ma. Preservation of the low-grade belt along the Vermont–New Hampshire border requires that crustal thickening in Vermont was not caused by emplacement of New Hampshire nappes onto eastern Vermont and that the nappes of western New Hampshire had time to cool before final juxtaposition against the low-grade belt. Cooling ages constrain this final juxtaposition to have occurred in the Carboniferous, suggesting that the Acadian was a prolonged event spanning as much as 100 Myr.

KEY WORDS: New England; Vermont; New Hampshire; Acadian; inverted metamorphism; P–T paths


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
M. J. Dorais, T. K. Pett, and M. Tubrett
Garnetites of the Cardigan Pluton, New Hampshire: Evidence for Peritectic Garnet Entrainment and Implications for Source Rock Compositions
J. Petrology, November 4, 2009; (2009) egp058v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
M. Brown
Metamorphic patterns in orogenic systems and the geological record
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 318(1): 37 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ajsHome page
B. A. Wing and J. M. Ferry
Magnitude and geometry of reactive fluid flow from direct inversion of spatial patterns of geochemical alteration
Am J Sci, May 1, 2007; 307(5): 793 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. M. Pyle, F. S. Spear, J. T. Cheney, and G. Layne
Monazite ages in the Chesham Pond Nappe, SW New Hampshire, U.S.A.: Implications for assembly of central New England thrust sheets
American Mineralogist, April 1, 2005; 90(4): 592 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
J. M. Pyle, J. M. Pyle, and F. S. Spear
Four generations of accessory-phase growth in low-pressure migmatites from SW New Hampshire
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2003; 88(2-3): 338 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.