Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANAND, M.
Right arrow Articles by DICKIN, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 44 | Number 12 | Pages 2139-2171 | 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003; all rights reserved

Early Proterozoic Melt Generation Processes beneath the Intra-cratonic Cuddapah Basin, Southern India

M. ANAND1,*, S. A. GIBSON1, K. V. SUBBARAO2, S. P. KELLEY3 and A. P. DICKIN4

1 DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, CAMBRIDGE CB2 3EQ, UK
2 DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES, INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, MUMBAI, POWAI, 400 076, INDIA
3 DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES, OPEN UNIVERSITY, MILTON KEYNES MK7 6AA, UK
4 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, McMASTER UNIVERSITY, HAMILTON, ONT. L8S 4M1, CANADA

* Corresponding author. Present address: Planetary Geosciences Institute, 306 GS Building, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. Telephone: +1-865-974-6024. Fax: +1-865-974-2368. E-mail: anandm{at}utk.edu

Early Proterozoic tholeiitic lavas and sills were emplaced during the initial phase of extension of the intra-cratonic Cuddapah Basin, southern India. 40Ar–39Ar laser-fusion determinations on phlogopite mica, from the Tadpatri Fm mafic–ultramafic sill complex, constrain the age of the initial phase of extension and volcanism in the basin at 1·9 Ga. Despite their Early Proterozoic age, the igneous rocks are unmetamorphosed, undeformed and remarkably fresh. They exhibit a wide range in MgO contents (4–28 wt %) and have undergone varying degrees of accumulation or crystal fractionation. Variable La/Nb ratios (1·2–3·7) and {varepsilon}Nd values (1 to -10) suggest that some, but not all, of the mafic rocks have been affected by crustal contamination. This appears to have taken place in magma chambers at ~9 kbar, i.e. the base of the continental crust. Forward modelling of major and trace elements (Fe and Nd) and inverse modelling of rare earth elements suggest that the primary Cuddapah melts were generated by ~10–15% partial melting of a lherzolite mantle source. This corresponds to a mantle potential temperature of ~1500°C. The thickness of the mechanical boundary layer predicted by the geochemical modelling is 70 km with a minimum initial lithospheric thickness of 120 km. This corresponds to a stretching factor of 1·6–1·8. Richter's (1988) secular cooling model for the Earth predicts that, at 1·9 Ga, the ambient mantle had a potential temperature of ~1500°C (i.e. ~200°C hotter than Phanerozoic mantle). If the cooling model is correct then Proterozoic lithospheric stretching and mantle melting beneath the intra-cratonic Cuddapah Basin could have been caused by passive rather than active rifting.

KEY WORDS: Proterozoic; intra-cratonic; Cuddapah Basin; rare earth element inversion; lithosphere


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
M Anand, S.S Russell, R.L Blackhurst, and M.M Grady
Searching for signatures of life on Mars: an Fe-isotope perspective
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 29, 2006; 361(1474): 1715 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
N. V. CHALAPATHI RAO, S. A. GIBSON, D. M. PYLE, and A. P. DICKIN
Petrogenesis of Proterozoic Lamproites and Kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India
J. Petrology, May 1, 2004; 45(5): 907 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.