Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEE, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by CHO, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 44 | Number 2 | Pages 197-226 | 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Metamorphic and Tectonic Evolution of the Hwacheon Granulite Complex, Central Korea: Composite P–T Path Resulting from Two Distinct Crustal-Thickening Events

SEUNG RYEOL LEE1 and MOONSUP CHO2,*

1GEOLOGY DIVISION, KOREA INSTITUTE OF GEOSCIENCE AND MINERAL RESOURCES, TAEJON, 305-350 SOUTH KOREA
2SCHOOL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, SEOUL, 151-742 SOUTH KOREA

The Hwacheon granulite complex (HGC), occupying the northeastern margin of the Gyeonggi massif, consists mainly of garnetiferous leucocratic gneiss and leucogranite together with minor kyanite–garnet gneiss, aluminous gneiss, mafic granulite and garnet amphibolite. Mineral assemblages and reaction textures in various rock types of the HGC document five distinct metamorphic stages: pre- (M1) and peak (M2) granulite-facies metamorphism; lower temperature, high (M3) and low (M4) pressure upper amphibolite-facies metamorphism; and local retrogression (M5) producing andalusite-bearing assemblages. Each metamorphic stage can be integrated to give a composite P–T path consisting of two distinct trajectories, characterized by clockwise P–T loops at relatively high and low temperatures, respectively. The first P–T trajectory (M1–M3) corresponds to a Palaeoproterozoic tectonometamorphic event responsible for the formation of the granulite complex at ~1·87 Ga. Rare inclusions of kyanite in M2 garnet from pelitic granulites suggest an episode of crustal thickening (M1) before M2. The peak granulite-facies metamorphism at ~7·0–9·5 kbar and 790–830°C induced widespread partial melting in pelitic granulites and produced syn- to post-tectonic, (para-)autochthonous leucogranites. An episode of quasi-isobaric cooling (M3) following the M2 event is apparent from the occurrence of garnet coronas around orthopyroxene in mafic granulites and kyanite replacing sillimanite in pelitic granulites. The heat required for granulite formation is attributed to the burial of sedimentary protoliths rich in radiogenic elements during the Palaeoproterozoic crustal-thickening event. The second P–T trajectory (M4) is correlated with the final exhumation of the HGC. This decompressional process, probably initiated in the kyanite stability field, reached pressures of ~3–6 kbar at 660–750°C. The clockwise P–T path may reflect the exhumation of a deep-seated crustal segment along discrete, ductile shear zones during the Permo-Triassic collisional orogeny prevalent in Far-East Asia.

KEY WORDS: crustal thickening; granulite; Gyeonggi massif; Korea metamorphism


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
M. ZHAI, J. GUO, P. PENG, and B. HU
U Pb zircon age dating of a rapakivi granite batholith in Rangnim massif, North Korea
Geological Magazine, May 1, 2007; 144(3): 547 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological MagazineHome page
M. ZHAI, Z. NI, C. W. OH, J. GUO, and S. G. CHOI
SHRIMP zircon age of a Proterozoic rapakivi granite batholith in the Gyeonggi massif (South Korea) and its geological implications
Geological Magazine, January 1, 2005; 142(1): 23 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.