Journal of Petrology | Volume 45 | Number 5 | Pages 907-948 | 2004
Journal of Petrology 45(5) © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.
Petrogenesis of Proterozoic Lamproites and Kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India
1 DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, DOWNING STREET, CAMBRIDGE CB2 3EQ, UK
2 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, McMASTER UNIVERSITY, HAMILTON L8S 4M1, ONT., CANADA
* Corresponding author. E-mail: sally{at}esc.cam.ac.uk
Proterozoic mafic potassic and ultrapotassic igneous rocks emplaced in the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton of the southern Indian shield are among the earliest recorded on Earth. Lamproites intrude the basin and its NE margin, whereas kimberlites intrude the craton to the west of the basin. Kimberlites occur in two spatially separate groups: the non-diamondiferous Mahbubnagar cluster that was emplaced at 1400 Ma and is of a similar age to the Cuddapah lamproites, and the predominantly diamondiferous Anantapur cluster, emplaced at 
1100 Ma. Despite their Proterozoic ages, some of the kimberlites are petrographically fresh. Distinct variations are evident in the major and trace element concentrations of the diamondiferous and non-diamondiferous kimberlites. The latter have higher concentrations of Fe, Ti, Zr, Hf and Sc, and lower Ni contents and La/Sm ratios. All of the kimberlites have high La/Yb ratios (65–180) and positive 
Ndi values (0·5–4·5), which suggests that their source regions were metasomatized by small-fraction melts derived from the depleted upper mantle, shortly prior to kimberlite genesis. Cuddapah Basin lamproites have similar La/Yb ratios but much lower Ndi values (–6 to –7) and appear to have been derived from ancient metasomatized sub-continental lithospheric mantle. The Proterozoic ambient mantle is believed to have had a higher potential temperature than at the present day such that small amounts of lithospheric extension may account for the genesis of the kimberlites and lamproites of southern India without the need for a mantle plume.
KEY WORDS: Proterozoic; diamonds; India; kimberlites; lamproites
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. C. Birkett FIRST-ROW TRANSITION ELEMENTS, Y AND Ga IN KIMBERLITE AND LAMPROITE: APPLICATIONS TO DIAMOND PROSPECTIVITY AND PETROGENESIS Can Mineral, October 1, 2008; 46(5): 1269 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Paton, J. M. Hergt, D. Phillips, J. D. Woodhead, and S. R. Shee New insights into the genesis of Indian kimberlites from the Dharwar Craton via in situ Sr isotope analysis of groundmass perovskite Geology, November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1011 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. BECKER and A. P. L. ROEX Geochemistry of South African On- and Off-craton, Group I and Group II Kimberlites: Petrogenesis and Source Region Evolution J. Petrology, April 1, 2006; 47(4): 673 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Maas, M. B. Kamenetsky, A. V. Sobolev, V. S. Kamenetsky, and N. V. Sobolev Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope evidence for a mantle origin of alkali chlorides and carbonates in the Udachnaya kimberlite, Siberia Geology, July 1, 2005; 33(7): 549 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. KUMAR and K. GOPALAN Comments on: 'Petrogenesis of Proterozoic Lamproites and Kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India' J. Petrology, June 1, 2005; 46(6): 1077 - 1079. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. V. CHALAPATHI RAO, S. A. GIBSON, D. M. PYLE, A. P. DICKIN, and J. DAY Petrogenesis of Proterozoic Lamproites and Kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India: a Reply J. Petrology, June 1, 2005; 46(6): 1081 - 1084. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|