Skip Navigation


Journal of Petrology Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2007
Journal of Petrology 2007 48(8):1495-1512; doi:10.1093/petrology/egm027
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/8/1495    most recent
egm027v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Menzies, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Geochemistry of the Arabian Lithospheric Mantle—a Source for Intraplate Volcanism?

J. E. Shaw1,2, J. A. Baker1,3, A. J. R. Kent4, K. M. Ibrahim5 and M. A. Menzies2,*

1Danish Lithosphere Centre, Øster Voldgade 10, Copenhagen, 1350 K, Denmark
2Department of Geology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham Tw20 0EX, UK
3School of Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand
4Department of Earth Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR97331-5506, USA
5Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Hashemite University of Jordan, Zarqa, Jordan

RECEIVED JANUARY 27, 2005; ACCEPTED APRIL 30, 2007


   Abstract

We present trace element and Sr–Nd–Hf–Pb isotope compositions for clinopyroxenes from anhydrous spinel peridotite and garnet ± spinel pyroxenite xenoliths of Pan-African lithospheric mantle from Jordan, including the first high-precision double-spike Pb isotope measurements of mantle clinopyroxene. Clinopyroxenes from the peridotites are variably Th–U–LILE–LREE enriched and display prominent negative Nb, Zr and Ti anomalies. MREE–HREE abundances can generally be modelled as partial melting residues of spinel lherzolite with primitive-mantle-like composition after extraction of 5–10% melt, whereas the enrichments in Th–U–LILE–LREE require a Pan-African or later metasomatic event. The large range of Nd, Sr, Pb and Hf isotope ratios in both peridotites and pyroxenites (e.g. {varepsilon}Nd ~ 1·4–17·5; 206Pb/204Pb ~ 17·2–20·4; {varepsilon}Hf ~ 0·6–164·6) encompasses compositions more radiogenic than mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB), and Pb isotopes cover almost the entire range of oceanic basalt values. {varepsilon}Hf values are some of the highest ever recorded in mantle samples and are decoupled from {varepsilon}Nd in the same samples. Marked correlations between Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes, LILE–LREE enrichments and HFSE depletion suggest that the metasomatizing agent was a carbonatitic-rich melt and isotopic data suggest that metasomatism may have been related to Pan-African subduction. The metasomatic melt permeated depleted upper mantle (<16 kbar) during Pan-African subduction at ~ 600–900 Ma, and the variably metasomatized material was then incorporated into the Arabian lithospheric mantle. There is no evidence for recent metasomatism (<30 Ma) related to the Afar plume like that postulated to have affected southern Arabian lithospheric mantle. Hf isotopes in the mantle clinopyroxenes are unaffected by metasomatism, and even some strongly overprinted lithologies record ancient (>1·2 Ga) pre-metasomatic Lu–Hf signatures of the depleted upper mantle that was the protolith of the Arabian lithospheric mantle. The ‘resistance’ of the Lu–Hf isotopic system to later metasomatic events resulted in the development of extremely heterogeneous Hf isotopic signatures over time that are decoupled from other isotopic systems. No mantle sample in this study exactly matches the chemical and isotopic signature of the source of Jordanian intraplate basalts. However, the xenolith compositions are broadly similar to those of the source of Arabian intraplate basalts, suggesting that the numerous Cenozoic intraplate volcanic fields throughout Arabia may be the product of melting upper mantle wedge material fertilized during Pan-African subduction and incorporated into the Arabian lithospheric mantle. We propose a model whereby the proto-Arabian lithospheric mantle underwent a major melting event in early Proterozoic–late Archean times (at the earliest at ~1·2 Ga). Island-arc volcanism and major crust formation occurred during the Pan-African orogeny, which liberated fluids and possibly small-degree melts that migrated through the mantle creating zones of enrichment for certain elements depending upon their compatibility. Immobile elements, such as Nb, were concentrated near the base of the mantle wedge providing the source of the Nb-rich Jordanian volcanic rocks. More mobile elements, such as LILE and LREE, were transported up through the mantle and fertilized the shallow mantle source of the Jordanian xenoliths. Following subduction, the mantle wedge became fossilized and preserved distinct enriched and depleted zones. Lithospheric rifting in the Miocene triggered partial melting of spinel-facies mantle in the lower lithosphere, which mixed with deeper asthenospheric garnet-facies melts as rifting evolved. These melts entrained segments of variably carbonatite-metasomatized shallow lithospheric mantle en route to the surface.

KEY WORDS: Arabian lithospheric mantle; Jordan; mantle xenoliths; Sr–Nd–Hf–Pb isotopes


*Corresponding author. E-mail: m.menzies{at}gl.rhul.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.