Skip Navigation


Journal of Petrology Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2007
Journal of Petrology 2008 49(4):823-839; doi:10.1093/petrology/egm033
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/4/823    most recent
egm033v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamenetsky, V. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kuzmin, D. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Olivine in the Udachnaya-East Kimberlite (Yakutia, Russia): Types, Compositions and Origins

Vadim S. Kamenetsky1,2, Maya B. Kamenetsky1,2, Alexander V. Sobolev2,3, Alexander V. Golovin4, Sylvie Demouchy5, Kevin Faure6, Victor V. Sharygin4 and Dmitry V. Kuzmin2,4

1Arc Centre of Excellence in Ore Deposits and School of Earth Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia
2Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Geochemistry Division, Mainz, 55020, Germany
3Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia
4Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia
5Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
6national Isotope Centre, GNS Science, PO Box 31-312, Lower Hutt, New Zealand

RECEIVED JANUARY 22, 2007; ACCEPTED JUNE 13, 2007


   Abstract

Olivine is the principal mineral of kimberlite magmas, and is the main contributor to the ultramafic composition of kimberlite rocks. Olivine is partly or completely altered in common kimberlites, and thus unavailable for studies of the origin and evolution of kimberlite magmas. The masking effects of alteration, common in kimberlites worldwide, are overcome in this study of the exceptionally fresh diamondiferous kimberlites of the Udachnaya-East pipe from the Daldyn–Alakit province, Yakutia, northern Siberia. These serpentine-free kimberlites contain large amounts of olivine (~50 vol.%) in a chloride–carbonate groundmass. Olivine is represented by two populations (olivine-I and groundmass olivine-II) differing in morphology, colour and grain size, and trapped mineral and melt inclusions. The large fragmental olivine-I is compositionally variable in terms of major (Fo85–94) and trace element concentrations, including H2O content (10–136 ppm). Multiple sources of olivine-I, such as convecting and lithospheric mantle, are suggested. The groundmass olivine-II is recognized by smaller grain sizes and perfect crystallographic shapes that indicate crystallization during magma ascent and emplacement. However, a simple crystallization history for olivine-II is complicated by complex zoning in terms of Fo values and trace element contents. The cores of olivine-II are compositionally similar to olivine-I, which suggests a genetic link between these two types of olivine. Olivine-I and olivine-II have oxygen isotope values (+ 5·6 ± 0·1{per thousand} VSMOW, 1 SD) that are indistinguishable from one another, but higher than values (+ 5·18 ± 0·28{per thousand}) in ‘typical’ mantle olivine. These elevated values probably reflect equilibrium with the Udachnaya carbonate melt at low temperatures and 18O-enriched mantle source. The volumetrically significant rims of olivine-II have constant Fo values (89·0 ± 0·2 mol%), but variable trace element compositions. The uniform Fo compositions of the rims imply an absence of fractionation of the melt's Fe2+/Mg, which is possible in the carbonatite melt–olivine system. The kimberlite melt is argued to have originated in the mantle as a chloride–carbonate liquid, devoid of ‘ultramafic’ or ‘basaltic’ aluminosilicate components, but became olivine-laden and olivine-saturated by scavenging olivine crystals from the pathway rocks and dissolving them en route to the surface. During emplacement the kimberlite magma changed progressively towards an original alkali-rich chloride–carbonate melt by extensively crystallizing groundmass olivine and gravitational separation of solids in the pipe.

KEY WORDS: kimberlite; olivine; partial melting; carbonatitic melt; oxygen isotopes; H2O


*Corresponding author. 61-3-62267649 +61-3- 62262547 dima.kamenetsky{at}utas.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J.-P. Burg, J.-L. Bodinier, T. Gerya, R.-M. Bedini, F. Boudier, J.-M. Dautria, V. Prikhodko, A. Efimov, E. Pupier, and J.-L. Balanec
Translithospheric Mantle Diapirism: Geological Evidence and Numerical Modelling of the Kondyor Zoned Ultramafic Complex (Russian Far-East)
J. Petrology, February 1, 2009; 50(2): 289 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Can MineralHome page
T. F.D. Nielsen and K. K. Sand
THE MAJUAGAA KIMBERLITE DIKE, MANIITSOQ REGION, WEST GREENLAND: CONSTRAINTS ON AN Mg-RICH SILICOCARBONATITIC MELT COMPOSITION FROM GROUNDMASS MINERALOGY AND BULK COMPOSITIONS
Can Mineral, August 1, 2008; 46(4): 1043 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
P. L. Roeder and D. J. Schulze
Crystallization of Groundmass Spinel in Kimberlite
J. Petrology, August 1, 2008; 49(8): 1473 - 1495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.