Skip Navigation



Journal of Petrology Advance Access published online on October 16, 2008

Journal of Petrology, doi:10.1093/petrology/egn050
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/10/1873    most recent
egn050v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Control of the Products of Serpentinization by the Fe2+Mg–1 Exchange Potential of Olivine and Orthopyroxene

Bernard W. Evans*

Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Box 351310, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1310, USA

Received December 3, 2007; Revised typescript accepted September 18, 2008


   Abstract

It is argued that the high-Mg content (mg-number = 95 ± 3) of the serpentine minerals in serpentinized peridotite is a consequence of the environmental Fe2+Mg–1 exchange potential imposed on the system by the abundance of olivine and orthopyroxene. Mass balance in the serpentinization reaction then requires the precipitation of an iron-rich mineral that in most cases is magnetite. This causes hydrogen to be evolved in an oxygen-conserved reaction. The low-variance mineral assemblage Ol + Srp + Brc + Mag sets the chemical potentials of H2O, SiO2 and O2 internally at an early stage in the process, but the paragenetic assessment of serpentinites is rendered difficult by the variable and usually unknown Fe3+ content of the serpentine minerals, particularly lizardite. Whole-rock analyses of highly to completely serpentinized peridotites reveal Fe3+/{Sigma}Fe ratios > 0·4, with an average value (0·69) similar to that of magnetite (0·67). This feature may be attributed to the presence of high-Fe3+ lizardite, as has been found in Mössbauer spectroscopy studies. Electron microprobe and scanning electron microcope analyses in the literature exhibit element trends (e.g. decreasing Si vs {Sigma}Fe a.p.f.u.) for olivine-pseudomorph lizardite and, with some exceptions, for bastite lizardite, that show a substitution of the cronstedtite component (Fe3+ charge-balanced on T and M sites). Cronstedtite substitution will be favoured at low temperature and/or low hydrogen fugacity, and in these circumstances less magnetite will be evolved during serpentinization, in some cases none at all. Some bastite lizardites from sea-floor settings show evidence of M-site vacancy substitution of Fe3+ for Fe2+. In the course of progressive serpentinization, micrometer to millimeter-scale variations in SiO2 potential may well be present, but their influence on Fe in lizardite seems to be limited to a few cases of lizardite associated with orthopyroxene. Chrysotile is on average more Mg-rich and less variable in Fe/Mg ratio than lizardite, facts that may be attributed to the greater Fe3+ content of lizardite. Chrysotile veins provide the best record available to us of the environmental Fe2+Mg–1 exchange potential in the pore fluid attending serpentinization. This potential serves as a robust control on serpentine and brucite compositions, although it may fail after olivine and orthopyroxene have been armoured or eliminated, and in more open-system environments (high water/rock ratio) such as on the sea floor or at serpentinite host-rock contacts. The default assumption in microprobe analyses that measured iron is all Fe2+ can lead to inappropriate petrological conclusions in the case of serpentinites.

KEY WORDS: serpentinization; serpentine; magnetite; FeMg–1 exchange potential; lizardite; chrysotile; cronstedtite; open or closed systems


*Corresponding author. E-mail: bwevans{at}u.washington.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
B. W. Evans, S. M. Kuehner, and A. Chopelas
Magnetite-free, yellow lizardite serpentinization of olivine websterite, Canyon Mountain complex, N.E. Oregon
American Mineralogist, November 1, 2009; 94(11-12): 1731 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. S. Beard, B. R. Frost, P. Fryer, A. McCaig, R. Searle, B. Ildefonse, P. Zinin, and S. K. Sharma
Onset and Progression of Serpentinization and Magnetite Formation in Olivine-rich Troctolite from IODP Hole U1309D
J. Petrology, March 1, 2009; 50(3): 387 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.