Skip Navigation



Journal of Petrology Advance Access published online on November 27, 2008

Journal of Petrology, doi:10.1093/petrology/egn059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/11/2081    most recent
egn059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morse, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The Internal Magma Reservoir of Large Intrusions Revealed by Multiphase Rayleigh Fractionation

S. A. Morse*

Department Of Geosciences, University Of Massachusetts, 611 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, Ma 01003-9297, USA

Received June 14, 2008; Revised typescript accepted October 16, 2008


   Abstract

The fractionation progress of a crystallizing basaltic magma is recorded in the changing mineral compositions of binary solutions that form a part of plagioclase, olivine, and augite. When such compositional data are plotted against an independent measure of progress such as volume, they can often be described by a Rayleigh equation that reveals details of the crystallization history. A binary solution crystallizing by itself follows a path determined by the Rayleigh exponent (D – 1) where D is the partition coefficient X1S/X1L (X is mole fraction, 1 is low-melting component, L is liquid, S is solid). In company with another phase, however, such a binary solution may follow a wide range of paths in an envelope about (D – 1), ranging from (a) f{alpha}(D – 1) to (b) (D – 1)/f{alpha}, where f{alpha} is the fraction of the active phase—the binary solution under consideration. The upper limiting curve, an extended fractionation path, is given by (a) above, whereas a full X2 depletion path (b) defines the lower limit. This range of alternatives is here codified and supplemented by considerations of residual porosity. The result is a Rayleigh equation in five variables that can illuminate magmatic history, including the probability of the existence of an internal reservoir that damps the depletion effect. The range of paths can help to identify evidence for, and causes of, leading-edge fractionation of ascending magma, small packet crystallization, pressure variations, off-cotectic excursions, and oscillating modal variation.

KEY WORDS: Magma reservoir; Rayleigh paths; binary solutions; Kiglapait; Skaergaard


*Corresponding author. Fax: 413-545-1200. E-mail: tm{at}geo.umass.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.