Skip Navigation



Journal of Petrology Advance Access published online on August 17, 2009

Journal of Petrology, doi:10.1093/petrology/egp049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boudier, F.
Right arrow Articles by Mainprice, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Serpentine Mineral Replacements of Natural Olivine and their Seismic Implications: Oceanic Lizardite versus Subduction-Related Antigorite

FranÇoise Boudier1,*, Alain Baronnet2 and David Mainprice1

1Geosciences, University of Montpellier II, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095-Montpellier, France
2University of Aix–Marseille and Cinam–Cnrs, Campus Luminy, Case 913, 13288-Marseille, Cedex 9, France

Received January 21, 2009; Revised typescript accepted July 10, 2009


   Abstract

We report on microstructural data obtained by optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy concerning the crystallographic relationships of serpentine minerals with their host olivine in two contrasting situations. In the first case, mesh-textured lizardite (liz) is developed in a standard 60% serpentinized oceanic harzburgite from the Oman ophiolite where olivine converts to columnar lizardite. The joined columns are perpendicular to the basal plane (001)liz, corresponding to the pseudofibres observed optically. The plane (001)liz is locally parallel to the narrow boundary ol–liz; thus column orientations register the interface of serpentinization. The ol–liz relationships are not strictly topotactic, but reflect preferred cracking orientations in olivine, parallel to (010)ol. In the second case, antigorite (atg) develops in a rare sample of antigorite schist in a kimberlite from Moses Rock (Colorado Plateau), representative of a suprasubduction-zone mantle wedge. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images along [010]atg show domains of very regular modulation with a 43·5 Å wavelength (m = 17, where m is the number of silicate tetrahedra along the wave), with few defects, indicative of HP–HT antigorite, and also heavily kinked regions as fingerprints of strong tectonic shear. TEM imaging and electron diffraction patterns reveal two topotactic relationships between antigorite and olivine: [100]atg//[010]ol and <100>atg//<100>ol; the planes in contact are (001)atg//(100)ol and (001)atg//(010)ol, respectively. The [010]atg//[001]ol and antigorite lamellae are parallel to the forsterite b-axis. In both cases, the topography of olivine–serpentine interfaces is controlled by open fluid pathways along microcracks oriented according to the anisotropy of the olivine aggregate. In the cases studied, the serpentine aggregate exhibits a preferred orientation inherited from that of the peridotite. These results have some relevance to the seismic anisotropy of serpentinized mantle. Anisotropy of propagation of seismic waves as a result of the olivine fabric is maintained and reinforced with the development of lizardite. Conversely, the development of antigorite produces a trench-parallel fast S-wave polarization and an anisotropy that is lowered at low degrees of serpentinization and then increased with increasing serpentinization.

KEY WORDS: serpentinized peridotite; lizardite; antigorite–olivine topotaxy; TEM; seismic anisotropy


*Corresponding author. E-mail: Francoise.boudier{at}gm.univ-montp2.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.