Skip Navigation

Erratum for Mahoney et al., J. Petrology 39 (7) 1285-1306.
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 39 | Number 11-12 | Pages 2153-2154 | 1998
© Oxford University Press 1998

Errata

J. J. Mahoney, R. Frei, M. L. G. Tejada, X. X. Mo, P. T. Leat & T. F. Nägler 1998. Tracing the Indian Ocean Mantle Domain Through Time: Isotopic Results from Old West Indian, East Tethyan, and South Pacific Seafloor. Journal of Petrology 39, 1285–1306.

The publisher wishes to apologize for the inclusion of an error in Figure 4 of the above-mentioned paper. The correct version of Figure 4 appears below.

H.-J, Yang, F. A. Frey, D. Weis, A. Giret, D. Pyle & G. Michon 1998. Petrogenesis of the Flood Basalts Forming the Northern Kerguelen Archipelago: Implications for the Kerguelen Plume. Journal of Petrology 39, 711–748.

The publisher wishes to apologize for the omission of data from Table 1 on page 718 of the above-mentioned paper. The corrected table is shown below.


Figure 01
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 4. Fig. 4. Age-corrected {varepsilon}Nd(t) (a, c) and (208Pb/204Pb)t (b, d) vs (206Pb/204Pb)t. Acid-leached (or glass) and unleached pairs are indicated by light and dark symbols, respectively, linked by tie lines. As in Fig. 3, the field for the modern Pacific–North Atlantic MORB source at 150 Ma (c, d) and 60 Ma (a, b) is unshaded, and additionally assumes an average 238U/204Pb = 5 and 232Th/238U = 2.3 in the source mantle (White, 1993); that for the Réunion–Crozet field at 150 Ma (c, d) is also unshaded and assumes source values of 12 and 3.3, respectively (Peng & Mahoney, 1995). Site numbers are shown adjacent to data points in (a) and (b), with ages in parentheses. Diamonds labeled AN at {varepsilon}Nd(t) ~–8 are for Afanasy-Nikitin Seamount (Mahoney et al., 1996); that at (206Pb/204Pb)t ~17.2 is for a seamount southwest of Afanasy-Nikitin estimated at 60 Ma (our unpublished data, 1997). Field for Samail ophiolite is from data of Chen & Pallister (1981) (for Pb isotopes) and McCulloch et al. (1981) [for {varepsilon}Nd(t].

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1:
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?