Journal of Petrology Advance Access originally published online on June 6, 2006
Journal of Petrology 2006 47(10):1915-1942; doi:10.1093/petrology/egl031
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Syros Metasomatic Tourmaline: Evidence for Very High-
11B Fluids in Subduction Zones
1 MINERALOGISCHES INSTITUT, UNIVERSITÄT HEIDELBERG IM NEUENHEIMER FELD 236, D-69120 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
2 INSTITUT DE GÉOLOGIE, UNIVERSITÉ DE NEUCHÂTEL RUE EMILE ARGAND 11, CH-2007 NEUCHÂTEL, SWITZERLAND
3 ISTITUTO DI GEOSCIENZE E GEORISORSE, CNR VIA MORUZZI 1, I-56124 PISA, ITALY
RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 19, 2005; ACCEPTED MAY 8, 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
High-pressure (HP) metamorphic blocks enclosed in a mafic to ultramafic matrix from a mélange on the island of Syros are rimmed by tourmaline-bearing reaction zones (blackwalls). The B isotopic composition of dravitic tourmaline within these blackwalls was investigated in situ by secondary ion mass spectrometry. Boron in these tourmalines is unusually heavy, with
11B values exceeding +18
in all investigated samples and reaching an extreme value of +28·4
in one sample. Blackwalls formed during exhumation of the HP mélange at a depth of 2025 km at temperatures of 400430°C, by influx of external hydrous fluids. The compositions of the fluids are estimated to be in the range of 100300 µg/g B with
11B values of +18 to +28
. The high
11B values cannot be explained by tourmaline formation from unmodified slab-derived fluids. However, such fluids could interact with the material in the exhumation channel on their way from the dehydrating slab to the site of tourmaline formation in the blackwalls. This could produce exceptionally high
11B values in the fluids, a case that is modelled in this study. The model demonstrates that subduction fluids may be effectively modified in both trace element and isotopic composition during their migration through the material overlying the subducting slab. Blackwall tourmaline from Syros has a large grain size (several centimetres), high abundance, and an exceptionally high
11B value. The formation of tourmaline at the contact between mafic or felsic HP blocks and their ultramafic matrix involved fluids released during dehydration reactions in the subducting slab. It forms a heavy-boron reservoir in hybrid rocks overlying the subducting slab, and may, thus, have a significant impact on the geochemical cycle of B and its isotopes in subduction zones. KEY WORDS: boron isotopes; tourmaline; subduction zone; fluid, high pressure
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Important constraints on the mechanisms of slab-to-mantle material transfer can be derived from the abundance and isotopic systematics of boron in subduction-related rocks. Element ratios such as B/Be and B/Nb and B isotope signatures have been used over the last
20 years to enhance our knowledge of slab dehydration and subduction-related melting processes. The high relative mass difference of the two stable isotopes of boron (10B and 11B) is responsible for variations in its isotopic composition in nature of about 100
(Palmer & Swihart, 2002
11B values in the subducting material (Peacock & Hervig, 1999
11B values from trench to back-arc (Ishikawa & Nakamura, 1994
11B values higher than mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) (or mantle), as a result of the interaction with seawater, which has a very high
11B value. The hydrous portion of the subducting slab, therefore, introduces large amounts of heavy B into the subduction zone.
Tourmaline
Tourmaline is the most widespread borosilicate mineral in natural rocks. It contains
3 wt % B, an element that is of very low abundance in most crustal and mantle rocks (e.g. Ryan & Langmuir, 1993
; Chaussidon & Jambon, 1994
; McDonough & Sun, 1995
; Taylor & McLennan, 1995
). Therefore, formation of tourmaline requires effective concentration of B, even if it is formed in rocks of the continental crust. This concentration is attained either (1) by magmatic differentiation, forming tourmaline in pegmatites enriched in B as a result of its highly incompatible character, or (2) by fluid-dominated processes because of the highly fluid-mobile character of B. The B necessary for tourmaline growth in fluid-saturated rocks may be supplied by other phases within the rock itself, such as clay minerals or mica (Nakano & Nakamura, 2001
) or by external fluids during metasomatism (Altherr et al., 2004
). Once formed, tourmaline is highly stable in a large variety of rock types over an exceptionally large PT range, including conditions in subducting slabs to depths of
250 km (Werding & Schreyer, 2002
).
Tourmaline from (ultra-)HP metamorphic rocks has been used to unravel the evolution of the B isotopic composition of rocks composing the subducted slab. It has been demonstrated by Bebout & Nakamura (2003)
that the
11B values of tourmaline decrease during prograde growth, are very low in HP growth zones, and increase in retrograde growth zones. Intracrystalline isotopic equilibration by diffusion is very limited and different growth zones still display their initial isotopic compositions. Tourmaline, therefore, provides a powerful tool to monitor the B isotope evolution of metamorphic rocks and provides important insights into the B isotope budget of metamorphic fluids.
Boron isotope ratios of tourmaline from metasomatic reaction zones in HP metamorphic rocks from the island of Syros are presented in this paper. Implications for
11B values of subduction zone fluids, together with a model providing an explanation for the extremely heavy B isotopic composition of Syros tourmaline, will be discussed.
| ANALYTICAL METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Compositions of mineral phases were determined using a Cameca SX 51 electron microprobe equipped with five wavelength-dispersive spectrometers (Mineralogisches Institut, Heidelberg). Operating conditions were 20 nA beam current and 15 kV acceleration voltage. For analyses of phengite, the electron beam was defocused to 10 µm to avoid loss of alkalis. For analyses of tourmaline it was defocused to 5 µm. Details on counting times, crystals, standards and detection limits have been given by Marschall (2005)
For tourmaline, a modified matrix correction was applied assuming stoichiometric oxygen and all non-measured components to be B2O3. The accuracy of the electron microprobe analyses of tourmaline and the correction procedure was checked by measuring three samples of reference tourmalines (98144, elbaite; 108796, dravite; 112566, schorl; Dyar et al., 1998
, 2001
). Under the described conditions, analytical errors on all analyses are ±1% relative for major elements and ±5% relative for minor elements. A detailed description of the electron microprobe techniques for tourmaline analysis has been given by Kalt et al. (2001)
.
Concentrations of H, Li and B and B isotope ratios were measured by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) with a modified Cameca IMS 3f ion microprobe at the Mineralogisches Institut, Heidelberg, equipped with a primary beam mass filter. Secondary ions 7Li and 11B in tourmaline were collected under an ion-imaged field of 150 µm diameter (Kalt et al., 2001
). Secondary ions of 1H were collected by reducing the 25 µm beam spot to an ion-imaged field of 12 µm by using a field aperture, to minimize the influence of surface contamination (Marschall & Ludwig, 2004
). Water contamination was further reduced using a cold-trap cooled with liquid nitrogen attached to the sample chamber of the IMS 3f. The relative ion yields (RIY) for H and B were determined using three tourmalines as reference material: elbaite (98144), dravite (108796) and schorl (112566). The relative reproducibility (1
) of the analyses of B was <1%. For Li the reference material was NIST SRM 610 (Pearce et al., 1997
) with a relative reproducibility of <1%. The accuracy is limited by matrix effects and the uncertainty of the element concentrations in the reference material; the relative uncertainty is estimated to be <25% for H, <20% for Li and <10% for B (Kalt et al., 2001
). Between 10 and 20 Li and B analyses and 510 H analyses were performed on tourmaline in each sample.
The analysis of boron isotope ratios required significant changes of both software and hardware of the SIMS. Most important were changes in the electronic control device of the magnet, which permitted faster switches between different masses and better stability of the magnet. The changes have been described in detail by Marschall (2005).
The primary ion beam was 16O accelerated to 10 keV with a beam current of 1 nA, resulting in count rates for 11B of
2 x 105 s1 and
5 x 104 s1 for 10B on tourmaline, collected by a single electron multiplier. The diameter of the 1 nA spot was
5 µm. The energy window was set to 50 eV and no offset was applied. Fifty cycles were measured on each analysis spot with counting times of 3·307 s and 1·660 s on 10B and 11B, respectively. Presputtering lasted for 5 min and the settling time between two different masses was 200 ms, resulting in total analysis time for one spot of
10 min. The internal precision of a single analysis was
1
(2
). Boron isotopic compositions of samples are reported using the
-notation (
11B in
) relative to the SRM 951 accepted value (Catanzaro et al., 1970
). Instrumental mass fractionation was corrected for by using three samples of reference tourmaline (98114, elbaite; 108796, dravite; 112566, schorl; Leeman & Tonarini, 2001
). Correction factors
inst for the different reference tourmalines resulted in a mean
inst of 1·0476. Reproducibility of measured isotope ratios during the analytical session (8 days) was ±0·5
.
During analysis of tourmaline samples by SIMS, traverses through different grains were measured to check for possible intra-grain variations in
11B. Between 10 and 50 boron isotope analyses were performed for each sample. SIMS analysis of our samples revealed very high 11B/10B ratios in contrast to the reference tourmalines, which range from 12·5
to 6·6
(Leeman & Tonarini, 2001
). To ensure consistency, three tourmaline samples from Syros were analysed by positive thermal ion mass spectrometry (P-TIMS), following the method of Tonarini et al. (1997)
. Correlation between SIMS and P-TIMS results for three Syros samples and the three reference tourmalines demonstrate good correlation between the two methods (see Fig. 2) used in the two laboratories. This proves the instrumental mass fractionation of SIMS to be independent of 11B/10B ratios in the range of
11B in natural tourmaline.
| GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The island of Syros displays a sequence of rocks belonging to the lower unit of the AtticCycladic Crystalline Complex (Dürr et al., 1978
470520°C and 1·32·0 GPa by different workers for different rock types (Dixon, 1968
|
|
The above-mentioned units of metabasites occur in the upper level of the major marbleschist sequence. The internal structure of the northern mélange in the area of Kámpos (Fig. 1), which is the best investigated area, is rather complex. A number of rock types have been distinguished on the basis of geochemical and petrographic observations within an eastwest-trending zone. They are interpreted as the high-pressure metamorphic equivalents of different parts of ancient oceanic crust (e.g. Seck et al., 1996
|
| INVESTIGATED SAMPLES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The eight blackwall samples investigated in this study (Table 1) were taken from different places within the mélange (Fig. 1). They all contain significant amounts of tourmaline, concentrated in millimetre- to centimetre-thick layers on the surface of the high-pressure blocks (Fig. 3b and c), or more evenly distributed single crystals or clusters of crystals (Fig. 3d) within them. Two samples (SY309B, SY420) are schists from the matrix, which contain tourmaline-rich layers or veins. Apart from tourmaline, the blackwall rocks contain omphacite (Jd3553), chlorite (clinochlore), phengite (3·33·4 Si per 11 oxygens), and almost pure albite (Ab97100). Some samples additionally contain biotite (Table 1). Quartz was not observed in any of the samples. Tourmaline in all samples is euhedral and does not show any sign of brittle or ductile deformation. In thin section, the grains commonly show visible zonation. Colours of the pleochroic cores change from colourless to blue, whereas those of the rims change from pale pink to green. Rims of tourmaline in some samples (SY400, SY441, SY442) show two or three zones with different shades of green. Resorption of core domains and replacement by rim material is limited, and resorption of rim domains was never observed.
|
Sample SY309 is composed of glaucophane schist (SY309A) and tourmaline-rich layers (SY309B). The latter are concordant with the foliation of the host rock and can be tracked over several metres in the outcrop. Sample SY309B, a 12 cm thick layer consisting of tourmaline + omphacite + chlorite + albite + phengite + glaucophane + epidote + apatite + rutile + titanite, is hosted in a glaucophane schist composed of glaucophane + epidote + phengite + titanite. Tourmaline crystals are 0·11·0 mm in diameter and 16 mm in length with some inclusions of titanite, rutile, omphacite, albite (Ab99·7) and apatite.
Sample SY327 is a dark green omphacitechlorite fels consisting of equal amounts of chlorite and omphacite, making up about 80% of the rock. Additional phases are abundant apatite (23 mm), albite, ilmenite, titanite, biotite, amphibole and tourmaline. Three compositional types of clinopyroxene were observed in the matrix. The first type forms the cores of large omphacite grains (15 mm) with intermediate acmite and jadeite contents (Jd37Acm28Q34). The second type is found as rims of the same grains with a much higher jadeite content (Jd52Acm27Q19). The third type is found in patches composed of small grains (10 µm) closely intergrown with albite (Ab97). Type-3 clinopyroxene has high acmite and very low jadeite contents (Jd15Acm49Q35 = aegirine). Garnet is not preserved in the rock, but was probably present before, as indicated by hexagonal pseudomorphs consisting of fine-grained chlorite. Amphibole occurs only as small inclusions (<100 µm) in tourmaline and is zoned from blue in the core to bluish green at the rim, with compositions changing from glaucophane to nyböite and magnesiokataphorite. Tourmaline grains are
4 mm in diameter and 3 cm in length and are highly poikiloblastic with inclusions of predominantly omphacite, bluegreen amphibole, apatite and chlorite.
Sample SY400 is a pale green tourmalineomphacitechlorite fels (Fig. 3d), consisting primarily of chlorite and fine-grained omphacite with minor epidote, phengite and accessory rutile, titanite and apatite. Tourmaline crystals are 25 mm in diameter and 1020 mm in length and highly poikiloblastic with inclusions of omphacite, rutile, titanite, apatite and epidote. The rock itself shows healed cracks (about 1 mm wide) filled by chlorite and prismatic omphacite, grown perpendicular to the cracks' elongation. The cracks can be traced pseudomorphically through the large tourmaline grains by zones of lower inclusion density. Tourmaline itself is not deformed or cracked. Therefore, tourmaline growth obviously postdates both chloritization and deformation.
Sample SY412 was taken from an interior part of an eclogite block, which shows a transition into a glaucophane-rich assemblage at its margins (see SY413 below). The eclogitic paragenesis of SY412 is garnet + type-1 omphacite + rutile + phengite + glaucophane + epidote (± quartz?). This primary assemblage is partly replaced by a secondary assemblage of dominantly hydrous minerals, which form small, closely intergrown aggregates between the larger primary phases. The secondary assemblage is composed of phengite + glaucophane + albite + chlorite + type-2 omphacite + tourmaline. In some patches, biotite formed at the expense of phengite. The eclogitic garnet contains inclusions of glaucophane and is partly pseudomorphosed by chlorite. It shows chemical zonation with decreasing Mn content and increasing Fe and Mg contents from core to rim (Table 2). Omphacite is chemically zoned with type-1 cores (Jd42Acm15Q41) and type-2 omphacite rims (Jd53Acm30Q14). Rutile is still abundant and shows only thin overgrowths of titanite (<5 µm). Tourmaline forms large grains 13 mm in diameter and 515 mm in length, with inclusions of omphacite, glaucophane, garnet, phengite, epidote, albite and rutile (Fig. 3e). Garnet grains included in tourmaline show incipient chloritization along cracks, which was obviously stopped by the shielding tourmaline (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, tourmaline locally grew into the chlorite-filled cracks in garnet. Therefore, we conclude that tourmaline replaced chlorite, but did not interact with garnet. Garnet rims are in direct contact with tourmaline and type-2 omphacite. The observed petrographic relationship of the minerals (i.e. tourmaline, omphacite, chlorite and garnet) are very similar to those described by Altherr et al. (2004)
.
|
Sample SY413 is part of the glaucophane-rich envelope of the above-described block of sample SY412. The rock is dominated by glaucophane and chlorite pseudomorphs after garnet, accompanied by phengite, omphacite, albite, titanite, tourmaline and epidote. Long-prismatic omphacite grains occur throughout the rock and also inside the large, poikiloblastic tourmaline grains. Further inclusions in tourmaline are glaucophane, rutile, titanite, albite, chlorite and epidote. Tourmaline grains are about 5 mm in diameter and 2030 mm in length. Omphacite is homogeneous (Jd45Acm12Q43). The paragenesis glaucophane + chlorite + albite + omphacite + phengite + tourmaline, which is found in some places in the core of the eclogite block (represented by sample SY412) is the dominant mineral assemblage of sample SY413. Garnet is entirely transformed to chlorite, and rutile is replaced by titanite.
Sample SY420 is a schist from the matrix surrounding the blocks of the Syros mélange. The rock is foliated and folded and shows layering with alternating epidote- and chlorite-rich layers, both of which contain abundant tourmaline, phengite, garnet and albite. Accessories are allanite (in the core of epidote), rutile and titanite. Rutile forms large inclusions (500 µm) in garnet. Garnet has developed a chemical zonation with Mn-rich cores (Alm57Sps7Grs28Prp4Adr4) and Fe-rich mantles (Alm63Sps2Grs26Prp5Adr4). The mantle is partially resorbed and replaced by chlorite + albite. Some grains, however, show newly grown rims with Ca- and Mn-rich compositions (Alm26Sps34Grs31-Prp5Adr4). They show a sharp contrast to the Fe-rich mantle without diffusional equilibration. Tourmaline grains are 0·10·5 mm in diameter and 13 mm in length. Inclusions in tourmaline are epidote and rutile.
Sample SY441 is part of a blackwall that consists almost exclusively of coarse-grained chlorite and clusters of large tourmaline crystals (Fig. 3f), with only little omphacite and titanite and accessory allanite and rutile. Tourmaline crystals are about 5 mm in diameter and 3050 mm in length, and show four zones in thin section. The cores (zone I) are light blue and sometimes contain inclusions of chlorite. The outer zones (IIIV) are free of inclusions and show greenish colours. Zone II is almost black and not developed in all grains. Zone III is dark green and the outermost zone IV is pale green.
Sample SY442 was taken from a blackwall wrapping an eclogite block with a thin black layer of tourmaline covering its surface (Fig. 3b). The blackwall is compositionally zoned with relatively sharp boundaries between the zones, changing with distance from the HP block. Sample SY442 was taken from a part consisting of omphacite and tourmaline crystals embedded in a matrix of albite (Fig. 3g and h). Tourmaline grains are 0·51·5 mm in diameter and 23 mm in length, and are concentrated in a layer of a few millimetres in thickness. They display four colour zones in thin section, with a light blue core (zone I), a green zone II, gradually fading into a dark, almost black zone III, which is sharply marked off from the green rim (zone IV; colours in plane-polarized light perpendicular to the c-axis; Fig. 3g). Omphacite inclusions are found in zones IIIV. Omphacite and albite (Ab99·2) in the rock matrix are closely intergrown and show petrographic equilibrium in thin section, suggested by sharp and euhedral grain boundaries (Fig. 3h). Omphacite is chemically zoned, with type-1 cores characterized by low jadeite contents (Jd36Acm22Q40) and type-2 rims with high jadeite contents (Jd54Acm19Q25).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PT conditions of formation of blackwalls and tourmaline
Temperature conditions during formation of tourmaline were calculated using the garnetclinopyroxene FeMg exchange thermometer, using the formulations by Ai (1994)
Determining the pressure conditions during formation of the reaction zones is hampered by the fact that the samples are silica-undersaturated and quartz is generally absent. The breakdown reaction of albite,
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
|
Samples SY309B, SY413 and SY412 show the mineral assemblage glaucophane + phengite + albite +chlorite + omphacite in equilibrium with tourmaline. The equilibrium of glaucophane, phengite, chlorite and albite or jadeite was calculated by the reactions
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
Figure 5a shows the calculated locations of reactions (1), (4) and (5) in a Plog a(SiO2) diagram, intersecting at the invariant point A at an assumed temperature of 400°C. Figure 5b displays the location of point A in the Plog a(SiO2) field for different temperatures and compositions. For a temperature of 400°C, point A is located at pressures of 0·61, 0·63 and 0·72 GPa for samples SY309B, SY413 and SY412, respectively. Silica activities in the three samples are 0·48 [SY309B; log a(SiO2) = 0·32], 0·42 [SY413; log a(SiO2) = 0·38] and 0·51 [SY412; log a(SiO2) = 0·29].
|
In accordance with other workers (Trotet et al., 2001b
100°C during decompression to
0·6 GPa. During exhumation of the unit, reaction zones formed at contacts between the contrasting lithologies, partly enhanced by mechanical mixing but also triggered by a strong influx of hydrous fluids, which reduced the activity of SiO2 in the rocks to values between 0·4 and 0·5. Reaction zones (blackwalls) are dominated by hydrous minerals such as chlorite, glaucophane, phengite, talc and Ca-amphibole, and contain abundant tourmaline that was precipitated during the formation of the blackwalls. PT conditions of tourmaline formation were 400430°C and 0·620·72 GPa (Fig. 6). Therefore, a major influx of boron-rich hydrous fluid into the Syros mélange must have occurred during exhumation of the unit at a depth of 2025 km.
|
Chemical composition of blackwall tourmaline
Apart from XMg, variation of tourmaline chemical composition between the samples is very limited (Table 3). Formula calculations based on 31 oxygens and total Fe as Fe2+ result in 5·865·99 Si, 5·826·09 Al, 3·053·17 B and 2·933·25 (Mg + Fe + Ti) per formula unit. Syros blackwall tourmaline analysed in an earlier study showed a Fe3+/
Fe ratio of
0·30 (Marschall et al., 2004
0·04 c.p.f.u. Cr. All other elements measured are of negligible concentrations in the tourmalines, including Mn, Zn, K and Li. Boron contents in excess of 3·00 c.p.f.u. in dravite, as well as high Na and OH contents, have been discussed by Marschall et al. (2004)
|
Boron isotopic composition of blackwall tourmaline
The small size of the SIMS spot during determination of B isotope ratios in tourmaline (
5 µm) allows us to measure very detailed profiles even in small grains, and to unravel small-scale isotopic heterogeneities. During this study, traverses with 1050 spots each were obtained for all eight samples. The results of these measurements show four important features, as follows.
(1) 11B/10B isotopic ratios are very high, exceeding
11B values of +18
in all samples, with an extreme value of +28·4 ± 0·7
(2
) in the tourmaline core of sample SY442 (Table 3, Fig. 7h).
|
(2) In seven out of eight samples intra-grain variation of
11B is very limited, with profiles showing very little or a lack of internal zonation (Fig. 7). Differences between core and rim values are within analytical uncertainties (Table 3).
(3) Variation of
11B between these seven different samples is also weak, ranging from +18·8 ± 0·9
(sample SY441) to +22·2 ± 1·5
(sample SY413).
(4) Sample SY442 is different from the other seven samples, as it displays a strong zonation in
11B (Fig. 7h), which correlates with the optically visible zones (Fig. 3g). The blue core as well as zones II and III are extremely enriched in the heavy isotope, with
11B values of
+28
(Table 3), whereas zone IV is significantly lighter. There is a sharp jump of
6
within 10 µm at the boundary between zones III and IV. Zone IV itself displays an internal isotopic zonation with
11B increasing from +21·5
in contact with zone III, to +24·0
in the centre of zone IV, to
+20·0
at the edge of the tourmaline (Fig. 7h). A more detailed discussion of the
11B profile in this sample is given below.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Boron concentration of blackwall-forming fluids
As no data on fluid inclusions related to the tourmaline-forming event are available, the concentration of B in the fluids can be estimated only indirectly from B concentrations in minerals. Omphacitic clinopyroxene formed together with tourmaline from different samples within the blackwalls contains between 1·92 µg/g (SY309B) and 3·28 µg/g (SY441) B (Marschall, 2005
150 µg/g and
300 µg/g B, in the temperature range of 350450°C. This may indicate that the calculated B concentrations of
100200 µg/g are not too low for the formation of tourmaline.
Fractionation of boron isotopes
Theoretical calculations of isotope fractionation of boron predict preference of 10B for crystallographic sites tetrahedrally coordinated to oxygen, and 11B for trigonal sites. B in acidic hydrous fluids is predominantly trigonally coordinated in B(OH)3 units. Recent experiments have shown that this also holds true for high pressures up to 2·0 GPa (Schmidt et al., 2005
). Boron in tourmaline is also typically trigonally coordinated with three BO3 groups per formula unit. Only small amounts of tetrahedral B were observed in tourmaline from Syros (Marschall et al., 2004
), ranging from 0·1 to 0·2 B c.p.f.u. Therefore, at least 95% of the B in Syros tourmaline is trigonally coordinated. The tourmaline-forming hydrous fluid must have been acidic to stabilize tourmaline and, therefore, contained B in trigonal coordination [B(OH)3].
Experimental studies (e.g. Hervig et al., 2002
and references therein; Heinrich et al., 2003
; Wunder et al., 2004
; Sanchez-Valle et al., 2005
) have investigated the temperature dependence of B isotopic fractionation between phases of different B coordination (e.g. mica, amphibole, melt, fluid, tourmaline). Hervig et al. (2002)
demonstrated a systematic decrease of fractionation with increasing temperature between phases containing tetrahedrally and trigonally coordinated boron, respectively, given by the formula
![]() | (6) |
where
is the fractionation factor and T is absolute temperature (K). For a temperature of 400°C, the assumed temperature for Syros blackwall formation, a fractionation of 12·6
between phengite and fluid or phengite and tourmaline results from this equation. Applying the formulations of other researchers to this example results in very similar isotope fractionations of 12·6
(Williams et al., 2001
) and 12·0
(Wunder et al., 2004
). We applied the formulation of Hervig et al. (2002)
, as it is based on the largest dataset, including natural and synthetic systems. The fractionation between tourmaline (0·15 BIV c.p.f.u.) and fluid would be 0·6
applying equation (6), assuming that equilibrium fractionation is exclusively determined by the coordination of B in the phases. However, Palmer et al. (1992)
have demonstrated experimentally a fractionation between tourmaline and fluid of
4·5
at 400°C and 0·2 GPa, which decreases with both increasing temperature and pressure.
Tourmaline from this study shows very homogeneous
11B values even in large grains. As these grains were precipitated from hydrous fluid(s) entering the rocks, boron isotopic fractionation processes between the two phases can be monitored using these samples. The formation of tourmaline containing
30 000 µg/g B significantly decreases the B concentration of any coexisting fluid. At low fluid/rock ratios, isotopic fractionation between tourmaline and fluid, as described by Palmer et al. (1992)
, would lead to an increase of
11B in the fluid over time and consequently to an isotopic zonation within the precipitated tourmaline grains, with
11B values increasing from cores to rims. Flat
11B patterns can be explained either (1) by a very high fluid/rock ratio, flushing the reaction zones with fluid of constant
11B, or (2) by weak or absent B isotopic fractionation between tourmaline and hydrous fluid at the PT conditions of interest. Some of the investigated samples indeed show evidence for high fluid/rock ratios, as they contain large amounts of chlorite and no relics of their primary parageneses. Those samples are located at the outermost parts of the high-pressure blocks (SY441), or in the matrix (SY309B). However, SY412 was sampled from the core of an eclogite block that shows a gradual transition into blueschist and finally a chlorite-rich assemblage at its rim. SY412 still shows high proportions of its eclogitic paragenesis (Grt + Omp I + Rt), and only restricted hydration. This sample also contains large tourmaline grains with flat
11B patterns (Fig. 7d). The petrographical observations suggest that (1) fluid/rock ratios strongly decreased from the matrix of the Syros mélange to the cores of the high-pressure blocks, and (2) fluid/rock ratios were rather low during retrogression of eclogite SY412, but significantly increased towards the block's rim (sample SY413). Fluid supply in the eclogitic core of the block was limited and the growing tourmaline must have had a strong impact on the B concentration of the fluid. Any isotopic fractionation between tourmaline and fluid would, therefore, have been documented in the precipitated tourmaline grains. The flat
11B patterns in sample SY412 can, thus, only be explained by negligible B isotopic fractionation between tourmaline and hydrous fluid. This is in agreement with the fact that B in both tourmaline and acidic hydrous fluids is predominantly in trigonal coordination. In addition, Tonarini et al. (1998)
reported
11B values of tourmaline precipitated in miarolitic dykes on Elba island (Italy). Those workers suggested negligible B isotopic fractionation between tourmaline and fluid as a possible explanation for the absence of any significant B isotopic zonation within the tourmaline. However, these suggestions are in contrast to the experimental study of Palmer et al. (1992)
at a pressure of 0·2 GPa.
B isotopic zonation in tourmaline of sample SY442
The strong B isotopic zonation in tourmaline of sample SY442 cannot be explained by fractionation effects between fluid and minerals during formation of the sample or by temperature effects. Instead, the zoning must be due to the precipitation of tourmaline from two different fluids of isotopically different composition entering the rock one after the other. This hypothesis is supported by the two-stage zonation of omphacite in this sample, showing the influx of a second fluid also leading to a drop in SiO2 activity. Omphacite in the matrix shows a two-stage zonation with cores of Jd36 and rims of Jd53. Omphacite included in tourmaline zones II and III (Fig. 3g) is relatively low in Na (Jd33), whereas the rims of omphacite included in tourmaline zone IV are high in Na (Jd45). Therefore, the two different omphacite generations can be related to different fluid pulses and growth stages of tourmaline, with a higher silica activity in the first fluid and a significantly lower a(SiO2) in the second fluid. Inclusions of type-1 omphacite in tourmaline zones I, II and III (high
11B) and inclusions of type-2 omphacite occurring exclusively in zone IV, characterized by lower
11B, support a genetic relationship between the two omphacite generations and the tourmaline generations. In some places, zone III is corroded and replaced by zone IV (Fig. 3g), suggesting that parts of the previously grown high-
11B tourmaline were dissolved during influx of the lower-
11B second fluid. This must have led to local mixing of B from the early tourmaline and the later fluid with their two contrasting isotopic compositions. The internal isotopic zonation of zone IV (Fig. 7h) is, therefore, best explained by mixing between B with
11B
+28
from early tourmaline and B with
11B
+20
from the second fluid. Hence, sample SY442 provides evidence for two fluids of different compositions.
Possible source of 11B-rich fluid
The formation of centimetre- to metre-sized reaction zones rich in OH-bearing minerals including tourmaline at 2030 km depth during exhumation requires large amounts of H2O and boron. Within the mélange itself, there are no appreciable sources of H2O, because the metabasic rocks were already dehydrated on the prograde path, and because OH-bearing minerals in carbonates and schists, such as glaucophane and mica, survived the peak and retrograde metamorphism. Furthermore, the upper thermal stability of antigorite was not reached at Syros (Fig. 6). Thus, serpentinite, which is, in principle, an important carrier of H2O, did not dehydrate. In addition, the fact that the low
11B values of minerals from the Syros high-pressure rocks were not significantly affected by late-stage fluid infiltration (Marschall, 2005
) rules out these rocks as a boron source for tourmaline formation. Phengite (
11B = 11·3 ± 1·4
) and metamorphic tourmaline (
11B = +0·9 ± 1·8
) in a siliceous marble, antigorite (
11B = +0·4 ± 7·8
) from a serpentinite, tourmaline from an eclogite (
11B = +2·8 ± 1·0
), and metamorphic tourmaline from a metasedimentary schist (
11B = 1·6 ± 1·1
) from the Syros mélange (Marschall, 2005
) all show that the fluids in equilibrium with these rocks would have had
11B values between 3 and +3
(marble, schist and eclogite) or about +13
(acidic fluid in isotopic equilibrium with serpentinite at 400°C), significantly lower than that required for blackwall formation. Thus, it is concluded that H2O and boron were introduced into the mélange from external sources.
Modern subduction zone models involve a wedge or channel of exhuming rocks, which is located between the subducting and the overriding plate (Shreve & Cloos, 1986
; Liou et al., 1997
; Engi et al., 2001
; Ernst, 2001
; Guillot et al., 2001
; Rubatto & Hermann, 2001
; Gerya et al., 2002
; Ring & Fleischmann, 2002
; Roselle & Engi, 2002
; Jolivet et al., 2003
). Slices of HP rocks, sheared off from the subducting plate and tectonically mixed with serpentinites from the hanging wall, may rapidly ascend in these exhumation channels, while the subduction system is still active. Therefore, fluids released from the subducting plate will enter the overlying exhumation channel and rehydrate the HP rocks on their way back to the surface. The source of the B-rich fluids fluxing into the Syros mélange is probably also located within the plate, which continued to subduct during the exhumation of the Syros mélange (Fig. 8).
|
Boron budget of fluids and rocks during dehydration
Major hosts of B in oceanic crust prior to subduction are low-temperature altered basalts and serpentinites that interacted with seawater at low temperatures, sediments (including pore water within the sediments) and altered basalts. B, therefore, is stored in the uppermost part of the subducting slab in the same reservoirs that contain most of the slab water. However, among these reservoirs, high
11B values (>+5
) are likely only in pore water, low-temperature altered basalts or serpentinites. B in altered basalts is mainly stored in clay minerals, either in their crystal structures or adsorbed on their surfaces (Harder, 1970

, Syros samples; , standard tourmalines (Leeman & Tonarini, 2001







) and SY413 () in P log a(SiO2) for different temperatures (given as numbers in °C).


