Skip Navigation


Journal of Petrology Advance Access originally published online on February 21, 2006
Journal of Petrology 2006 47(5):929-964; doi:10.1093/petrology/egi101
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/5/929    most recent
egi101v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by USUI, T.
Right arrow Articles by HELMSTAEDT, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Petrology and Geochemistry of Eclogite Xenoliths from the Colorado Plateau: Implications for the Evolution of Subducted Oceanic Crust

TOMOHIRO USUI1,*, EIZO NAKAMURA1 and HERWART HELMSTAEDT2

1 PHEASANT MEMORIAL LABORATORY FOR GEOCHEMISTRY AND COSMOCHEMISTRY, INSTITUTE FOR STUDY OF THE EARTH'S INTERIOR, OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY AT MISASA, TOTTORI, 682-0193, JAPAN
2 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY, KINGSTON, ONT., K7L 3N6, CANADA

RECEIVED DECEMBER 9, 2004; ACCEPTED DECEMBER 19, 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Eclogite xenoliths from the Colorado Plateau, interpreted as fragments of the subducted Farallon plate, are used to constrain the trace element and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic compositions of oceanic crust subducted into the upper mantle. The xenoliths consist of almandine-rich garnet, Na-clinopyroxene, lawsonite and zoisite with minor amounts of phengite, rutile, pyrite and zircon. They have essentially basaltic bulk-rock major element compositions; their Na2O contents are significantly elevated, but K2O contents are similar to those of unaltered mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB). These alkali element characteristics are explained by spilitization or albitization processes on the sea floor and during subduction-zone metasomatism in the fore-arc region. The whole-rock trace element abundances of the xenoliths are variable relative to sea-floor-altered MORB, except for the restricted Zr/Hf ratios (36·9–37·6). Whole-rock mass balances for two Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths are examined for 22 trace elements, Rb, Cs, Sr, Ba, Y, rare earth elements, Pb, Th and U. Mass balance considerations and mineralogical observations indicate that the whole-rock chemistries of the xenoliths were modified by near-surface processes after emplacement and limited interaction with their host rock, a serpentinized ultramafic microbreccia. To avoid these secondary effects, the Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic compositions of minerals separated from the xenoliths were measured, yielding 0·70453–0·70590 for 87Sr/86Sr, –3·1 to 0·5 for {varepsilon}Nd and 18·928–19·063 for 206Pb/204Pb. These isotopic compositions are distinctly more radiogenic for Sr and Pb and less radiogenic for Nd than those of altered MORB. Our results suggest that the MORB-like protolith of the xenoliths was metasomatized by a fluid equilibrated with sediment in the fore-arc region of a subduction zone and that this metasomatic fluid produced continental crust-like isotopic compositions of the xenoliths.

KEY WORDS: Colorado Plateau; eclogite xenolith; geochemistry; subducted oceanic crust


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Material recycling through subduction zones is one of the most important processes controlling the chemical evolution of the Earth, and materials from the Earth's surface are likely to have been reintroduced into its interior throughout geological history. Although most of the subducting plate is made of mantle material returning to depths from which it originated, hydrated and altered upper oceanic crust, as well as overlying sediments, carry a record of low-temperature interactions with continents, oceans and the atmosphere into the deep mantle. Subduction of surface and near-surface components can change the volatile contents, trace element abundances, amounts of heat-producing elements and radiogenic isotope systematics in the mantle.

A number of geochemical models have been developed to estimate the integrated trace element and isotopic composition of a hypothetical slab-derived ‘component’ in arc and ocean island basalt (OIB) lavas (e.g. Zindler & Hart, 1986Go; McCulloch & Gamble, 1991Go; Ishikawa & Nakamura, 1994Go; Hofmann, 1997Go; Taylor & Nesbitt, 1998Go; Stracke et al., 2003Go). However, contributions from individual sources are difficult to assess from lava compositions alone, because element fractionations during slab dehydration and mass fluxes from the various subducted ‘lithologies’ are poorly constrained. Nevertheless, most models have used a geochemical ‘component’ estimated from rock compositions prior to subduction (e.g. samples from ocean-floor drilling). Therefore, understanding the trace element and isotopic compositions of individual rock types subducted into the sub-arc mantle is indispensable for constraining geochemical models for subduction-zone material recycling.

One approach to constrain material cycling involves high-pressure experimental studies that simulate processes such as dehydration of the subducting slab under controlled conditions (e.g. Schmidt & Poli, 1998Go; Okamoto & Maruyama, 1999Go; Poli & Schmidt, 2002Go). Such experiments provide important constraints on the water contents and metamorphic phase relations in the subducting slab as a function of temperature and pressure. Other experiments have investigated the solubility of elements in fluids at high pressures, as well as element partitioning between the fluids and the constituent minerals in potential slab materials such as eclogites, blueschists and serpentinites (e.g. Brenan et al., 1994Go, 1995Go, 1998Go; Iizuka & Nakamura, 1995Go; Ayers et al., 1997Go; Kogiso et al., 1997Go; Stalder et al., 1998Go). However, microanalytical and mass balance studies of subduction-related metamorphic rocks have shown that many so-called trace elements are preferentially partitioned into accessory minerals such as allanite, rutile, apatite, and zircon, and that elemental partitioning commonly does not reach equilibrium because of the relatively low-temperature environment envisaged in the subducting oceanic lithosphere (e.g. Sorensen & Grossman, 1989Go, 1993Go; Sorensen, 1991Go; Tribuzio et al., 1996Go; Zack et al., 2002aGo, 2002bGo; Spandler et al., 2003Go). This suggests that partition coefficient data for trace elements may not be appropriate for evaluating trace element behaviors in subducting oceanic crust.

Thermomechanical studies indicate that subducting oceanic crust in cold subduction zones passes through the blueschist to lawsonite eclogite transition, and that the most important dehydration process for inducing island arc volcanism occurs in the lawsonite eclogite facies (Peacock, 1993Go). Thus, lawsonite eclogites are critical to investigating trace element and isotopic behavior in subducted oceanic crust. However, data for trace element distributions among the mineral assemblages in the lawsonite eclogite facies are limited, because lawsonite eclogite terranes are rare (Zack et al., 2004Go), and commonly much overprinted by high-T/P retrogression.

Lawsonite-bearing eclogite xenoliths from the Colorado Plateau of the southwestern USA present an important opportunity to study the trace element and isotopic systematics of this lithology. Helmstaedt & Doig (1975)Go showed that these xenoliths resemble eclogites of the Franciscan Complex of the California Coast Ranges, western USA, in many aspects of their petrography and geochemistry. The Franciscan Complex represents fragments of a fossil subduction-zone plate boundary from the Jurassic to the Paleogene (e.g. Ernst, 1970Go; Maruyama & Liou, 1989Go). Offshore magnetic anomalies demonstrate that thousands of kilometers of oceanic crust have been subducted beneath the western US continental margin since the Late Cretaceous (Hamilton, 1969Go). Usui et al. (2003)Go used ion microprobe techniques to determine the U–Pb ages of zircons from the Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths, which yielded concordant ages from 81 to 33 Ma. Those workers interpreted the two extremes in age to reflect zircon crystallization during subduction-related metamorphism and zircon recrystallization during intrusion of the host rock. Combining geotectonic reasoning with the zircon geochronology and petrographic similarities to subduction-related eclogites led Usui et al. (2003)Go to conclude that the Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths originated as fragments of the subducted Farallon plate that had resided in the upper mantle since the Late Cretaceous. Owing to their rapid transport to the surface, the eclogite xenoliths show few effects of retrograde overprinting compared with crustal eclogites exhumed by tectonic processes. Thus, they may preserve important chemical information about their subduction-related metamorphic history.

Two problematic issues remain concerning the origin of the Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths. One is whether they represent fragments of relatively young Phanerozoic subducted oceanic crust (Helmstaedt & Doig, 1975Go; Usui et al., 2003Go) or remnants of the much older, Proterozoic basement of the Colorado Plateau (Roden et al., 1990Go; Wendlandt et al., 1993Go; Smith et al., 2004Go). The contrasting hypotheses for their ages may be considered to result, in part, from the application of different geochronological methods to date them. U–Pb zircon ages by ion microprobe analysis have yielded Phanerozoic ages (Usui et al., 2003Go), whereas Sm–Nd isotopic data (Roden et al., 1990Go; Wendlandt et al., 1993Go) give Proterozoic model ages in the range of 1500–1800 Ma. In addition, U–Pb analyses of multigrain zircon fragments by the isotope dilution method with thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) resulted in a linear discordant line that intersected the concordia at 1514 Ma (Smith et al., 2004Go).

The other debated issue is whether the Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths were formed by prograde metamorphism during subduction of oceanic lithosphere or by magmatic recrystallization processes in the upper mantle. Based on mineral textures and compositional zoning of garnet and clinopyroxene, Helmstaedt & Schulze (1988Go, 1991Go) concluded the former. They estimated two metamorphic temperatures for the eclogite xenoliths, corresponding to crystallization of garnet cores and peak metamorphic conditions, respectively, and concluded that the garnet rims formed at ~100°C higher temperatures than the garnet cores. However, these estimates are unlikely to be conclusive because: (1) they depend on calculating the Fe2+/Fe3+ of clinopyroxene, a parameter that cannot be determined by electron microprobe; (2) it is difficult to determine the clinopyroxene core–garnet core temperature by using clinopyroxene with an oscillatory zoned structure. Smith & Zientek (1979)Go suggested that the oscillatory zoning of clinopyroxene may represent disequilibrium growth in the presence of fluid phases, and that the Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths formed coexisting with a fluid phase during cooling and metasomatism of basaltic dikes in a cool upper mantle.

In this paper, we report whole-rock and mineral data for major, minor, and trace elements, and Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopic data for a suite of Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths. The geochemical data are complemented by observations of the modes of constituent minerals, their textures and chemical zoning structures. We reassess the contrasting hypotheses for the origin of the Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths and demonstrate that these rocks can be used as proxies to understand the geochemical evolution of subducted oceanic crust. These data allow us to develop a model for the trace element and isotopic (Sr, Nd and Pb) composition of subducted oceanic crust in the sub-arc region.


    GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
The Colorado Plateau is a broadly elevated region, ~1500 m above sea level, in the southwestern interior of the USA. Unmetamorphosed and little deformed Paleozoic to Cenozoic sedimentary rocks are well exposed on Precambrian basement (1·4–1·8 Ga; Condie, 1982Go). The plateau is surrounded by the Basin and Range, Rocky Mountains, and the Rio Grande Rift tectonic provinces, all of which have experienced intense Cenozoic orogenic activity and extensional tectonics (Fig. 1a). The structure of the Colorado Plateau consists of broad basins, uplifts and platforms, which are locally bordered by monoclines. Tectonic reconstruction of the history of the western margin of North America suggests that during the Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary, the Farallon plate was subducting eastward (Atwater, 1970Go). The Late Cretaceous and Tertiary records of arc magmatism in the southwestern USA constrain the slab geometry and its evolution, suggesting that the migration of arc magmatism was probably caused by progressive flattening of a subducting slab (Coney & Reynolds, 1977Go). Intra-plate magmatism, which occurred extensively around the Colorado Plateau, may be associated with the formation of a slab window and/or slab tearing (Dickinson, 1997Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. (a) Sketch map of the southwestern interior of the USA and outline of the Colorado Plateau (dotted line). (b) Sketch map of the Navajo Volcanic Field in the Colorado Plateau near the Four Corners shown as the gray shaded area in (a), modified after Smith & Levy (1976)Go. •, minettes; {circ}, serpentinized ultramafic microbreccia diatremes. Major monoclines with dip directions are also shown. ME, Mule Ear; MR, Moses Rock; CN, Cane Valley; GR, Garnet Ridge; RM, Red Mesa; BP, Buell Park; GK, Green Knobs; SF, San Francisco; LA, Los Angeles.

 
Eight diatremes of serpentinized ultramafic microbreccia and numerous minette diatremes, the products of intra-plate magmatism, are exposed in the Navajo Volcanic Field of the Colorado Plateau (Fig. 1b). The microbreccia diatremes occur as two structurally controlled clusters (McGetchin et al., 1977Go). One, related to the Comb Ridge monocline on the eastern margin of Monument uplift, includes the Mule Ear, Moses Rock, Cane Valley, and Garnet Ridge diatremes. The other, at the eastern margin of the Defiance uplift, includes the Buell Park and Green Knobs diatremes. A single diatreme, Red Mesa, lies between the two fields and is located about 30 km east of the Comb Ridge monocline.

The diatreme rocks that host the eclogite xenoliths lack primary igneous textures and consist of finely crushed fragments of strongly serpentinized ultramafic rocks. Although initially described as kimberlites (e.g. McGetchin et al., 1977Go), these rocks are not ‘true’ kimberlites (e.g. Clement et al., 1984Go) but serpentinized ultramafic microbreccias (SUM; Roden, 1981Go). The microbreccia diatremes were emplaced between 25 and 35 Ma (Naeser, 1971Go; Helmstaedt & Doig, 1975Go; Roden et al., 1979Go), contemporaneous with the numerous minette diatremes of the Navajo Volcanic Field (Ehrenberg, 1982Go). The diatremes contain several types of eclogite, as well as a broad spectrum of possible upper mantle rocks that include variously hydrated spinel- and garnet-bearing peridotites, pyroxenites and serpentinites. The eclogite xenoliths are found mainly in three microbreccia diatremes in the Comb Ridge cluster (Garnet Ridge, Moses Rock, Mule Ear), and are absent from the Green Knobs and Buell Park pipes near the Defiance uplift (McGetchin et al., 1977Go; Selverstone et al., 1999Go). The samples used for this study were collected from the Moses Rock and Garnet Ridge diatremes.


    ANALYTICAL METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Major element compositions of minerals were determined using a JEOL JXA-8800 electron microprobe at ISEI (Institute for Study of the Earth's Interior). Analyses were carried out at 15 kV and 20 nA sample current for all silicate minerals. Counting times of 30 s were used, and matrix corrections were performed by ZAF methods. The standards are synthetic oxides and natural minerals. The modal abundance of zircon was determined by digital image analysis of 25 randomly selected back-scattered electron images (each 1000 µm) per sample.

Trace element analyses of garnet, clinopyroxene, lawsonite and zoisite were performed using a CAMECA ims-5f ion microprobe at the PML (Pheasant Memorial Laboratory) in the ISEI, using techniques described by Nakamura & Kushiro (1998)Go. Clinopyroxene from mantle xenoliths and basaltic natural glass were used as standard minerals for trace element calibrations. Trace element concentrations in these standards were chemically determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; Makishima & Nakamura, 1997Go). The homogeneity of these standards was confirmed by optical microscope, electron microprobe and ion microprobe analysis. Trace element contents of garnet and clinopyroxene were calibrated on the basis of the clinopyroxene standard, and those of lawsonite and zoisite were calibrated using the basaltic glass standards. Minerals in thin sections were sputtered with an O primary beam of 10–20 nA intensity, resulting in 10–20 µm beam diameter. Clinopyroxene and lawsonite inclusions <30 µm in diameter were measured by an O primary beam of ~6 nA intensity, which produced a beam <10 µm in diameter. Positive secondary ions were collected by ion counting using an energy offset of –60 V from 4500 V acceleration with an energy bandpass of ±10 V. These operating conditions resulted in (1–1·5) x 105 c.p.s. for 30Si secondary ions. The secondary ion intensities of atomic masses of interest were normalized to 30Si. For each analysis spot, 15 trace elements were determined in a run that took ~40 min, including presputtering. The analytical reproducibility (relative standard deviation % for n = 10) for trace element measurements is generally <10% for the clinopyroxene standard and <5% for the basaltic glass standard, except for Er and Lu (7–10%).

To prepare whole-rock powders for analysis, eclogite samples were broken into chips ~2 mm in diameter. Fresh pieces were hand-picked and washed with deionized water in an ultrasonic bath for 30 min. After drying at 60°C overnight, the chips were pulverized using a silicon nitride triturator to a grain size <400 mesh. To separate minerals, rock powders obtained using the silicon nitride triturator were sieved to capture grain sizes between 80 and 100 mesh (an average grain size of ~200 µm). This sieved fraction was processed with an isodynamic separator, and the resulting mineral fractions were hand-picked.

Whole-rock major element compositions, along with Cr and Ni, were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry at the PML, on glass beads fluxed from mixing 100 mg of powdered sample and 5 g of lithium tetraborate (Takei, 2002Go). Trace element compositions were measured by ICP-MS at the PML, based on the methods of Makishima & Nakamura (1997)Go for Y, Cs, Ba, rare earth elements (REE), Pb, Th and U, those of Makishima et al. (1999)Go for Zr, Hf and Nb, and of Moriguti et al. (2004)Go for Li. Powdered samples (20 mg) for ICP-MS analysis were decomposed in 1·0 ml of HF and 0·1 ml of HNO3 in Teflon bombs at 210°C for 2 days, because acid-resistant minerals such as zircon and rutile are present in the eclogite samples. Analytical errors for trace element were generally 3% for Zr, Hf, and Li, and 5% for other elements.

The analytical procedures for mass spectrometry followed Yoshikawa & Nakamura (1993)Go for Sr isotopic ratios and abundances of Rb and Sr, Makishima & Nakamura (1991)Go for Nd isotopic ratios and abundances of Sm and Nd, Kuritani & Nakamura (2002Go, 2003Go) for Pb isotopic ratios and Pb abundances, and Yokoyama et al. (1999Go, 2003Go) for abundances of U and Th, employing TIMS in static multi-collection mode [modified Finnigan MAT261: ‘Kiji’ (Nakano & Nakamura, 1998Go), MAT262: ‘Taro’ and MAT262: ‘INU’]. All of these elements (Rb, Sr, Sm, Nd, U, Th and Pb) were successively separated from each of the whole-rock and mineral samples, using a multi-ion exchange column chemistry approach modified after Nakamura et al. (2002)Go.

Basaltic standard JB3 from the Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ) yields typical analytical reproducibility of 0·005%, 0·005% and 0·02% for Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic ratios, respectively, and <1% for Rb, Sr, Sm, Nd, U, Th and Pb abundances. Accuracies of the isotopic and concentration analyses were confirmed by repeated measurement of JB3. We obtained data for this standard consistent with the previously published data within the analytical reproducibility (see Appendix, Table A1). Isotopic fractionation during analysis was corrected using 86Sr/88Sr = 0·1194 and 146Nd/144Nd = 0·7219 as normalizing factors. Pb isotopic fractionation was corrected by the ‘two-double spikes method’ with 205Pb–204Pb and 207Pb–204Pb enriched spikes following the technique of Kuritani & Nakamura (2003)Go. The composition of the spike was calibrated by assuming that the 208Pb/206Pb ratio of NBS982 is 1·00016 (Catanzaro et al., 1968Go). Instrumental mass discrimination of TIMS analyses was corrected by the following values of standards: 87Sr/86Sr = 0·71024 (NIST987), 143Nd/144Nd = 0·511839 (La Jolla), and 206Pb/204Pb = 16·9424, 207Pb/204Pb = 15·5003, 208Pb/204Pb = 36·7266 (NBS981).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1: Mineral assemblages of Colorado Plateau xenoliths

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Mineral assemblage and classification of eclogite xenoliths
The Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths investigated in this study were previously described and referred to as metabasic eclogite and jadeite-clinopyroxenite, based not only on their mineral assemblages and basaltic bulk compositions, but also on their textural similarity to crustal examples of eclogites (Helmstaedt & Schulze, 1988Go). In this paper, ‘jadeitic’-clinopyroxenite is used instead of jadeite-clinopyroxenite, because clinopyroxene in this xenolith type is not pure jadeite, but omphacite or impure jadeite as described later. The mineral assemblages of the xenoliths and their modal proportions are given in Tables 1 and 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2: Modal proportions (vol. %) in the Colorado Plateau xenoliths

 
Metabasic eclogites consist mainly of various proportions of almandine-rich garnet and omphacitic clinopyroxene with some lawsonite and zoisite (Fig. 2). They are either lawsonite-eclogite or zoisite-eclogite, according to the major constituent mineral assemblages (Table 1). Zoisite-eclogite is distinguished from lawsonite-eclogite only by its lack of lawsonite, although trace amounts of lawsonite crystals occur as small (~10 µm) inclusions in garnet in zoisite-eclogites (Fig. 3c). With a decrease in garnet content (approximately <10 vol. %) and an increase of the jadeite component in the clinopyroxene (approximately >70 mol %), the metabasic eclogites grade continuously into jadeitic-clinopyroxenites. Other minerals that occur in trace amounts in both xenolith types are phengite, pyrite, rutile, zircon and apatite. Rare chlorite, albite and barite occur as <5 µm crystals around garnet and clinopyroxene. In both eclogite types, coesite occurs as <20 µm inclusions in garnet crystals, but not in the matrix (Fig. 3a; Usui et al., 2002Go, 2003Go).


Figure 2
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (a), (b) Back-scattered electron (BSE) image of lawsonite-eclogite GR1. (c) BSE image of included clinopyroxene and lawsonite in GR1. A crack in the lower part of the garnet connects the lawsonite pseudomorphs and an included clinopyroxene to the exterior of the garnet. (d) Photomicrograph (plane-polarized light) of GR1 showing curved trails of inclusions (rutile and coesite) in garnet. Abbreviations are as in Table 1.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. (a) BSE image of zoisite-eclogite MR7 showing that garnet includes various kinds of inclusions, such as clinopyroxene, coesite, rutile and zircon. (b) High-contrast BSE image of annealed cracks (shown by small arrows) in garnet in zoisite-eclogite MR4. Major element compositions of annealed garnet are similar to that of the reaction rim (see text for details). (c) BSE image of zoisite-eclogite MR7 showing that lawsonite can still survive as inclusions in garnet. (d) BSE image of jadeitic-clinopyroxenite MR3B. Garnet (shown in Fig. 5) includes lawsonite pseudomorphs that are replaced by fibrous zoisite aggregates along with rutile. Cracks connect these lawsonite pseudomorphs. Ion-microprobe pits are indicated by small arrows. Abbreviations are as in Table 1.

 
Occurrence, textures and compositions of minerals
Garnet
Garnet commonly occurs in small clusters or in thin layers accompanied by lawsonite and zoisite; these generally have euhedral to subhedral outlines with maximum diameters of ~0·1–1·0 mm (Figs 2a and 3a). They are commonly color-zoned, from pink cores to reddish brown rims under plane-polarized light (Fig. 2d). Some grains exhibit rotation textures and contain fine-grained curved inclusion trails of coesite and rutile, indicating that deformation continued after the development of a planar tectonic fabric (Fig. 2d) (see also Helmstaedt & Schulze, 1991Go).

Garnets have compositions of Alm (Almandine)50–70, Sps (Spessartine)<1, Pyr (Pyrope)10–30, Grs (Grossular)20, except for locally developed pyrope-rich rims (Table 3 and Fig. 4). These pyrope-rich rims have distinctively different compositions from the other parts of the garnet, indicating a sharp compositional boundary (Fig. 2a). The compositions of these pyrope-rich rims are about Alm40Sps<1Pyr50Grs10 for the lawsonite-eclogite and Alm40Sps<1Pyr40Grs20 for the zoisite-eclogite. The rims may have formed under higher temperature conditions when the xenoliths were entrained in the microbreccia host rock, as will be discussed later, and are called ‘reaction rims’, to distinguish them from ‘normal rims’ the composition of which is almost identical to those of the core and mantle (Table 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Composition of garnets in (a) lawsonite-eclogite GR1, (b) zoisite-eclogite MR4 and (c) jadeitic-clinopyroxenite MR3B plotted in the system (Alm + Sps)–Pyr–Grs. The shaded part of the full compositional triangle (d) is enlarged in (a), (b) and (c). Stippled pattern indicates garnets in eclogite xenoliths from diamondiferous kimberlites; cross-hatched pattern, garnets in eclogites from subduction-related metamorphic suites.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3: Representative electron microprobe analyses of garnet

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4: Representative electron microprobe analyses of clinopyroxene

 
In some particularly zoisite-rich eclogites (e.g. MR4, see Table 2), wide reaction rims are present around most garnet crystals, and also penetrate into the garnet cores along cracks (Fig. 3b). The chemical compositions of these garnets in the ‘zoisite-rich’ eclogites trend toward those of the reaction rims in the (Alm + Sps)–Pyr–Grs diagram (Fig. 4b). In contrast, no reaction rims were observed in jadeitic-clinopyroxenites, which have little or no lawsonite and zoisite, although some garnets have slightly pyrope-rich compositions (Figs 4c and 5a).


Figure 5
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. (a) BSE image of garnet in jadeitic-clinopyroxenite MR3B. The garnet does not have any reaction rims. Lawsonite pseudomorphs preserve sharp and euhedral crystal boundaries of the original lawsonite, which are connected by cracks. (b) Electron microprobe X-ray map for Mn in the garnet shown in (a). White and red colors indicate higher concentration than green and blue.

 
The major element compositions of the garnet, except for the reaction rims, are more similar to those from eclogites in subduction-related metamorphic terranes (Low-Temperature eclogite) than to those from diamondiferous kimberlite pipes (High-Temperature eclogite) (Carswell, 1990Go). The garnets show faint zoning in their Alm, Pyr and Grs components but strong and euhedral zoning in their Sps component, which is much lower than the other three components (Fig. 5). The core is characteristically enriched in Mn relative to the rim.

Clinopyroxene
Clinopyroxene is generally prismatic, and its orientation defines the rock fabric. In thin section it varies in color from colorless to pale green under plane-polarized light. The grain size varies as a result of deformation and synkinematic recrystallization (Helmstaedt & Schulze, 1988Go). Clinopyroxene grains in the eclogites have compositions near Jd (Jadeite)40–50, Aug (Augite)50–60, Ac (Acmite)0–8, falling into the range of omphacite compositions (Table 4, Fig. 6a and b). On the other hand, clinopyroxenes in the jadeitic-clinopyroxenites have compositions of Jd65Aug20Ac15 to Jd75Aug20Ac5. This variation suggests relatively linear jadeite to acmite substitution (Fig. 6c). Clinopyroxene occurs both as inclusions in garnet (referred as ‘included clinopyroxene’)and in the matrix (referred to as ‘matrix clinopyroxene’; Figs 2c and 3a). Included clinopyroxene grains are richer in Ac and poorer in Jd components than matrix clinopyroxene grains, and their composition varies linearly between Jd35Aug50Ac15 and Jd40Aug55Ac5 (Fig. 6a and b).This trend is also a jadeite to acmite substitution but it differs from the compositional variations of the matrix clinopyroxene.


Figure 6
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Compositions of clinopyroxene in (a) lawsonite-eclogite GR1, (b) zoisite-eclogites, MR4 and MR7, and (c) jadeitic-clinopyroxenite MR3B plotted in the system Jd–Ac–(Aug + Cats). The shaded part of the full compositional triangle (d) is enlarged in (a), (b) and (c). Broken arrow in (d) shows the compositional change of clinopyroxene in basic rocks from the Franciscan metamorphic suite with increasing metamorphic pressure and temperature through to blueschist facies (Maruyama & Liou, 1988Go). The classification and the nomenclature of clinopyroxene follow Essene & Fyfe (1967)Go.

 
Lawsonite and zoisite
Lawsonite is transparent in plane-polarized light. Except for minute inclusions in garnet crystals in the zoisite-eclogite (Fig. 3c), lawsonite is restricted to lawsonite-eclogite. It is invariably rimmed by fine-grained zoisite aggregates (Fig. 2b). Lawsonite grains display relatively uniform compositions close to the ideal formula of CaAlSi2O7(OH)2·H2O, with limited substitution of Fe3+ for Al and (Na + K) for Ca (Table 5; e.g. Moore & Liou, 1979Go). Like clinopyroxene, lawsonite occurs both as inclusions in garnet (referred to as ‘included lawsonite’) and as matrix grains (referred to as ‘matrix lawsonite’) (Fig. 2b and c). Included lawsonite grains in unfractured garnet crystals lack any rims of zoisite aggregates (Fig. 3c). Most included lawsonites have higher Fe2O3 and lower Al2O3 contents than matrix lawsonite (Table 5 and Fig. 7).


Figure 7
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. XFe3+ of lawsonite in lawsonite-eclogite GR1 plotted against XAl. XFe3+ and XAl are the cation numbers of Fe3+ and Al in lawsonite, respectively, when the oxygen number is eight.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5: Representative electron microprobe analyses of lawsonite and zoisite

 
Zoisite invariably occurs as fine-grained, fibrous and radiating crystal aggregates in eclogite and some jadeitic-clinopyroxenites (Figs 2 and 3). Whereas the zoisite crystals themselves are transparent, the aggregates are dark brown in plane-polarized light. The grain size of zoisite is generally <10 µm along the major axis and <1 µm along the minor axis, and is much smaller than that of the other constituent minerals, garnet, clinopyroxene, lawsonite, phengite and rutile. It contains 39·7–40·2 wt % SiO2, 32·6–32·3 wt % Al2O3, 23·6–24·2 wt % CaO, and trace amounts of Fe2O3, MgO, TiO2, Na2O and Cr2O3 (Table 5). The textures and major element composition of zoisite are almost identical in lawsonite-eclogite, zoisite-eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite. Zoisite aggregates also occur as inclusions in fractured garnet preserving the sharp crystal boundaries of euhedral lawsonite pseudomorphs (Fig. 3d), suggesting that the zoisite aggregates originated by replacement of lawsonite.

Other minerals
Phengite occurs in one eclogite (GR1) and two jadeitic-clinopyroxenite (MR21 and MR3B) samples. Grains are platy and up to 0·5 mm in diameter, have relatively homogeneous major element compositions and are characterized by Si values of ~7·5 p.f.u. (per formula unit, O = 22; Table 6). In jadeitic-clinopyroxenite samples, albite occurs as a secondary phase along clinopyroxene grain boundaries and rarely along cleavages. The mode of albite is <0·1 vol. %, and it contains <1 % of Or and An components. Orthoclase is present only as inclusions in the core of a garnet from eclogite MR7. Its composition is close to the ideal formula of KAlSi3O8 (Table 6). Amphibole does not occur in any of our metabasic eclogite xenoliths.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6: Representative electron microprobe analyses of other constituent minerals

 
Trace element compositions of minerals
Garnets from eclogites and jadeitic-clinopyroxenites are characterized by extreme LREE (light rare earth element) depletion and HREE (heavy rare earth element) enrichment, exceeding a chondrite-normalized Yb/Ce ratio of 104 (Fig. 8). Garnets have REE patterns that appear to increase progressively from La to Dy and are convex-upward from Dy to Lu, except for the reaction rim. The REE patterns of the reaction rims differ in shape from those in other parts of the garnet; they are characteristically convex-upward from La to Dy and concave-downward from Dy to Lu. LREE (La, Ce, Pr and Nd) and MREE (middle rare earth elements: Sm, Eu, Gd and Dy) contents are mostly uniform throughout the crystal, whereas HREE (Er, Yb and Lu) contents are markedly zoned (Fig. 8). The HREE are more abundant in the core relative to the rim, and show a strong correlation with Mn contents (Fig. 9). Garnets in all of the xenoliths are rich in Y, which decreases from core to rim, similar to the HREE (Table 7). Other trace element data for garnet measured by ICP-MS are listed in Table 10.


Figure 8
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns of garnet, clinopyroxene, lawsonite and zoisite in eclogites (GR1, MR4 and MR7) and jadeitic-clinopyroxenites (M26 and MR47). The rare earth element data are normalized to the C1 chondrite value of Sun & McDonough (1989)Go.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Zoning profiles along traverse X–Y in Fig. 2a for HREE, Y and Mn (XSps) in the garnet. Concentrations of Dy, Er, Yb, Lu and Y were analyzed simultaneously by ion microprobe, and are normalized to the primitive mantle value of Sun & McDonough (1989)Go. The Mn content of the garnet next to the ion microprobe pits was analyzed by electron microprobe.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7: Representative ion microprobe trace element analyses of garnet (ppm)

 
The clinopyroxenes show two groups of trace element compositions (Fig. 8). The LREE, MREE and Sr contents of clinopyroxenes are higher in eclogite than jadeitic-clinopyroxenite. On the other hand, the HREE and Y contents of clinopyroxenes in eclogite are slightly lower than those of counterparts in jadeitic-clinopyroxenite (Table 8 and Fig. 8). Clinopyroxene in eclogite has REE patterns that are convex-upward from La to Dy and concave-downward from Dy to Lu. Such HREE characteristics are only weakly developed in clinopyroxene from the jadeitic-clinopyroxenites. In particular, no HREE depletion is observed in jadeitic-clinopyroxenite MR47 that contains <0·1 vol. % of garnet. Clinopyroxenes in both eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite are poor in HFSE (Zr <1 ppm and Nb <0·001 ppm; Table 8). Other trace element data for clinopyroxene measured by ICP-MS are listed in Table 10.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8: Representative ion microprobe trace element analyses of clinopyroxene (ppm)

 
Lawsonite and zoisite are rich in incompatible trace elements, especially U, Th, Pb, LREE and Sr. They are poor in high field strength elements (HFSE), similar to clinopyroxene (Tables 9 and 10). Matrix lawsonite from the lawsonite-eclogite sample has trace element abundances similar to those of matrix zoisite (Fig. 8e). The matrix lawsonites appear unzoned in trace elements, and the trace element abundances are almost identical among the matrix lawsonite grains in each sample. However, matrix and included lawsonites display different REE patterns. Matrix lawsonites exhibit gently convex-upward LREE-enriched patterns from La to Er and relatively unfractionated patterns from Er to Lu. Included lawsonite grains have fairly flat REE patterns that decease slightly from La to Lu (Fig. 8). The trace element patterns of zoisite grains in eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite vary from sample to sample. For example, zoisite from apatite-bearing zoisite-eclogite MR7 contains less LREE than other zoisites (Fig. 8). This may reflect equilibration with apatite that is REE-rich (Usui, 2004Go). Other trace element data for zoisite measured by ICP-MS are listed in Table 10.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9: Representative ion microprobe analyses of trace elements in lawsonite and zoisite (ppm)

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 10: Trace element compositions of separated minerals measured by ICP-MS

 
Whole-rock chemistry
Major element whole-rock compositions (Table 11) are plotted against SiO2 contents in Fig. 10. Compositions of fresh and altered mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) from ocean-floor drilling holes 504B and 417D (Tual et al., 1985Go; Zuleger et al., 1995Go), and subduction-related metamorphic rocks thought to originate from MORB-type oceanic crust (Becker et al., 1999Go; Bröcker & Enders, 2001Go; Gao & Klemd, 2001Go), are plotted for comparison. The whole-rock major element compositions of the eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite xenoliths do not lie in the ranges of either altered or fresh MORB. Instead, they are within the ranges of the subduction-related metamorphic rocks. In particular, the xenoliths are characterized by distinctively higher Na2O contents with increasing SiO2 contents than those of altered MORB, resulting in a continuous and near-linear trend on the SiO2 vs Na2O Harker diagram (Fig. 10b). In contrast, K2O, FeO*, Al2O3, and TiO2 in both eclogites and jadeitic-clinopyroxenites are almost identical to those of altered MORB. Such major element characteristics are commonly observed in metabasic rocks from subduction-related metamorphic terranes, and they have been explained by spilitization during high-temperature hydrothermal alteration at mid-ocean ridges and subduction-related metasomatism at fore-arc depths (e.g. Zack et al., 2003Go). In particular, high Na2O contents that are decoupled from K2O contents are best explained by spilitization–albitization (Fig. 11). The jadeitic-clinopyroxenites are richer in Na2O and SiO2 than the eclogites, although there appears to be a continuous transition and overlap between the two groups. This reflects the differences in mineralogical composition and modal proportions of the major constituent minerals: Jd components in the clinopyroxenes are richer in the jadeitic-clinopyroxenites than those in the eclogites, and the jadeitic-clinopyroxenites contain more clinopyroxene but less garnet, lawsonite and zoisite than the eclogites (compare Fig. 6 and Table 2 with Fig. 10).


Figure 10
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Whole-rock major element compositions (wt % oxide) of the eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite xenoliths as a function of SiO2 content (wt %). {circ}, eclogite; {triangleup}, jadeitic-clinopyroxenite. Compositional fields of fresh MORB and altered MORB are based on data from Tual et al. (1985)Go and Zuleger et al. (1995)Go, and that of subduction-related metamorphic rocks, which represent MORB-type oceanic crust, is from Becker et al. (1999)Go, Bröcker & Enders (2001)Go and Gao & Klemd (2001)Go.

 

Figure 11
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11. Whole-rock Na2O and K2O contents (wt %) in eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite xenoliths. The field of fresh MORB (data sources as in Fig. 10) and trends produced by spilitization–albitization and low-T seawater alteration (see text for explanation) are also shown.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 11: Major and trace element compositions of whole-rock samples

 
Whole-rock chondrite-normalized REE patterns of eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite xenoliths are shown in Fig. 12; altered MORB from ocean-floor drilling hole 504B is shown as a shaded field for comparison. Eclogites have LREE-enriched patterns that decrease progressively from La to Lu, resulting in chondrite-normalized abundance ratios [La/Lu]N = 6·0–11 and [La/Sm]N = 2·5–3·3 that are distinctively greater than those of altered MORB (Table 11). In addition to the higher abundance ratios, LREE concentrations are higher in the eclogite than in altered MORB. Jadeitic-clinopyroxenites display V-shaped REE patterns with the lowest normalized abundances at Eu. Although jadeitic-clinopyroxenites exhibit variable LREE contents, which are lower than those of the eclogites, their chondrite-normalized [La/Sm]N ratios are relatively constant and similar to those of the eclogite xenoliths. The REE patterns of eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite xenoliths are probably controlled by the modes of garnet and zoisite (or lawsonite), which have extremely different REE characteristics (Fig. 8). HFSE abundances are almost identical between eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite. The Zr/Hf and Nb/Ta ratios of the xenoliths vary from 36·9 to 37·6 and from 10·9 to 15·0, respectively. Both fall in the range of altered MORB, although the contents of these elements in the xenoliths are slightly higher than those of altered MORB (David et al., 2000Go). The abundances of other trace elements, especially Pb, Sr and U, vary considerably; they are generally more abundant in eclogite than jadeitic-clinopyroxenite (Table 11).


Figure 12
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12. Whole-rock rare earth element patterns of (a) eclogite and (b) jadeitic-clinopyroxenite xenoliths normalized to the C1 chondrite values of Sun & McDonough (1989)Go. Shaded area shows the compositional field of altered MORB after Bach et al. (2003)Go.

 
Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic compositions
Whole-rock Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic data were age-corrected to 30 Ma (Table 12), the emplacement age of the host rock at Moses Rocks and Garnet Ridge (Naeser, 1971Go; Helmstaedt & Doig, 1975Go; Usui et al., 2003Go), and are plotted on 87Sr/86Sr–{varepsilon}Nd, {varepsilon}Nd–206Pb/204Pb, 206Pb/204Pb–207Pb/204Pb and 206Pb/204Pb–208Pb/204 diagrams (Fig. 13). The isotopic compositions of Juan de Fuca MORB and Phanerozoic Cordilleran crust, which represent Farallon MORB and its sedimentary cover, respectively, are shown for comparison.


Figure 13
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13. Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic compositions of whole-rocks and the constituent minerals in eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite xenoliths plotted in (a) {varepsilon}Nd vs 87Sr/86Sr, (b) 206Pb/204Pb vs {varepsilon}Nd, (c) 207Pb/204Pb vs 206Pb/204Pb, and (d) 208Pb/204Pb vs 206Pb/204Pb diagrams. All measured data were age-corrected to 30 Ma. Compositional fields of Juan de Fuca MORB and Phanerozoic Cordilleran crust are based on data from Church & Tatsumoto (1975)Go, Aleinikoff (1987), Hegner & Tatsumoto (1987)Go, White et al. (1987)Go and Farmer et al. (1993)Go. Northern Hemisphere Reference Line (NHRL; Hart, 1984Go) is also shown.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 12: Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic compositions of whole-rock samples

 
The Sr isotopic ratios of the eclogites and jadeitic-clinopyroxenites vary (87Sr/86Sr = 0·7050–0·7084) and are greater than those of MORB. The jadeitic-clinopyroxenites have much higher Sr isotopic ratios than the eclogites. In contrast, the Nd isotopic compositions are similar in both eclogites and jadeitic-clinopyroxenites; {varepsilon}Nd values vary from –3·1 to –1·2, much less than those of MORB, but similar to those of crustally derived sediments. Eclogites and jadeitic-clinopyroxenites have Pb isotopic compositions (206Pb/204Pb = 18·91–19·38, 207Pb/204Pb = 15·62–15·68, and 206Pb/204Pb = 38·68–38·92) that fall in the compositional field of sedimentary rocks in 206Pb/204Pb–207Pb/204Pb and 206Pb/204Pb–208Pb/204Pb diagrams (Fig. 13).

In addition to the whole-rock data, Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd and U–Th–Pb isotopic studies were also performed on garnet, clinopyroxene and zoisite mineral separates from the xenoliths (Table 13). The Pb isotopic compositions of garnet were not measured because of its extremely low Pb contents (0·038–0·087 ppm; see Table 10). Reference isochrons at 30 Ma were calculated to pass through each mineral in the 87Sr/86Sr–87Rb/86Sr, 143Nd/144Nd–147Sm/144Nd and 206Pb/204Pb–238U/204Pb isotopic systems to distinguish isotopic equilibrium and disequilibrium at 30 Ma (Fig. 14). If one mineral was isotopically in equilibrium with another when the host diatremes were emplaced, the reference isochrons for the two minerals should be coincident within error. The slope of the reference isochron for the Rb–Sr system is almost horizontal because of the small variation of Rb/Sr ratio.


Figure 14
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14. Rb–Sr, Sm–Nd and U–Pb isochron diagrams for constituent minerals in eclogite MR19 (a, c, and e) and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite MR26 (b, d and f) xenoliths. The lines marked in each figure are 30 Ma reference isochrons, which were calculated to pass through the three constituent minerals: G, garnet; C, clinopyroxene; Z, zoisite; W, whole-rock. Continuous line, zoisite; dotted line, clinopyroxene; dashed line, garnet. Vertical bar shows standard deviation (2{sigma}) in Table A1.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 13: Sr, Nd and Pb isotopic compositions of minerals

 
Figure 14a and b shows Rb–Sr isochron diagrams for representative eclogite sample MR19 and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite sample MR26; the diagrams include both mineral and whole-rock data. Both whole-rock values of 87Sr/86Sr are greater than those of the constituent minerals, although the minerals in the eclogite xenolith have almost identical Sr isotopic compositions. Individual minerals in the jadeitic-clinopyroxenite have different isotopic compositions, suggesting that they were not in equilibrium with each other at 30 Ma.

The reference Sm–Nd isochrons for all minerals and the whole-rock of eclogite are coincident within error (Fig. 14c), but garnet from the jadeitic-clinopyroxenite has a different Nd isotopic composition from the other minerals and the whole-rock (Fig. 14d). Zoisites display almost identical Sm/Nd abundance ratios and Nd isotopic compositions to those of the whole-rocks because they are the dominant reservoir for LREE in both eclogite and jadeitic-clinopyroxenite (as discussed later; see Fig. 15).


Figure 15
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 15. Mass balance calculations for (a) eclogite MR19 and (b) jadeitic-clinopyroxenite MR26. Density-weighted modal abundances of minerals are calculated by multiplying the mode in vol. % in Table 2 by densities. The densities are interpolated from values of Deer et al. (1992)Go: 4·1 for Alm70Pyr30 garnet; 3·3 for omphacitic clinopyroxene; 3·15 for zoisite. Bar length corresponds to the amount of the trace element in each phase in relative proportion to the whole-rock concentration. If the total amount of the relative proportions of the minerals falls in the range 80–120%, mass balances are judged to be achieved, considering uncertainties in modal proportions of minerals and heterogeneity in their trace element concentrations; outside this range, either the uptake of trace elements in an unanalyzed phase or overestimation of modal proportions is suspected.

 
The Pb isotopic compositions of clinopyroxene in the eclogite xenoliths are almost in equilibrium with zoisite at 30 Ma (Fig. 14e). In contrast, the Pb isotopic compositions of clinopyroxene and zoisite in jadeitic-clinopyroxenite are not in equilibrium with each other at 30 Ma. Such features are weakly observed in the other U-series isochron diagrams (207Pb/204Pb–235U/204Pb and 208Pb/204Pb–232Th/204Pb). Although zoisite is the dominant host of U and Pb, it has distinctively different Pb isotopic compositions and U/Pb abundance ratios from those of the whole-rocks. This might be explained by the presence of zircons with extremely high 238U/204Pb (>106) and 206Pb/204Pb (>103) (Usui, 2004Go).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 APPENDIX
 REFERENCES
 
Evidence for high-P/T prograde metamorphism
The compositional zoning structure of garnet and the inclusion assemblages within garnet grains in eclogites and jadeitic-clinopyroxenites preserve information about a certain range of the PT history of the xenoliths. The Sps component of garnet in both xenolith types is markedly zoned and preserves a fine euhedral structure (Fig. 5). Mn zoning of this type is not observed in other mantle-derived eclogite xenoliths; however, it is common in garnet-bearing regional metamorphic rocks that have undergone prograde metamorphism (e.g. Atherton & Edmunds, 1966Go; Zack et al., 2004Go). The Mn zoning of the garnet in the xenoliths is thus interpreted to reflect growth during prograde metamorphism.

Included clinopyroxenes are richer in Ac and poorer in Jd contents than matrix clinopyroxene (Fig. 6). This probably reflects jadeite–acmite substitution. Clinopyroxene generally becomes more jadeitic and less acmitic with increasing pressure and temperature in the upper blueschist to eclogite facies (Maruyama & Liou, 1988Go). Most included lawsonite grains have higher Fe2O3 and lower Al2O3 contents than matrix lawsonite (Fig. 7). Maruyama & Liu (1988)Go reported negative correlations between Fe3+ and Al molar abundances in lawsonite during progressive metamorphism at blueschist facies: Fe3+ content decreases with increasing pressure and temperature. Thus, included clinopyroxene and lawsonite probably formed in a lower pressure and temperature metamorphic environment than matrix clinopyroxene and lawsonite.

Garnet grains from the Colorado Plateau eclogites contain curved trails of fine-grained coesite and rutile inclusions (Fig. 2d), indicating the former presence of a planar tectonic fabric (see also Helmstaedt & Schulze, 1988Go, 1991Go). Such textures do not commonly form by magmatic processes, but are commonly found in regional metamorphic suites, such as those of Corsica and the Franciscan metamorphic complex of the western USA, which are known for their occurrences of high-pressure and low-temperature eclogites (Caron & Pèquignot, 1986Go; Maruyama & Liou, 1988Go). Thus, the inclusions indicate that the immediate protolith of the eclogite xenoliths was a fine-grained foliated rock, probably a blueschist.

In summary, garnet crystals grew during prograde metamorphism, and successively captured minerals such as clinopyroxene and lawsonite, reaching peak metamorphic conditions ranging from 560 to 700°C at 3 GPa and to 600 to 760°C at 5 GPa (Usui et al., 2003Go). Such high-P–low-T environments, which are colder than typical mantle geotherms, can be achieved only in subducted oceanic lithosphere. Therefore, we propose that the Colorado Plateau eclogite xenoliths formed by prograde metamorphic recrystallization of subducted oceanic crust.

‘Retrogression’ of eclogite xenoliths during emplacement
The Colorado Plateau eclogites were entrained within and rapidly transported to the surface by the host ultramafic microbreccia diatremes during the Tertiary (~30 Ma). The eclogite xenoliths exhibit less retrograde overprinting than subduction-related eclogites from high-pressure metamorphic terranes, as indicated by the absence of amphibole. However, some modifications resulting from xenolith–host-rock interaction are observed. In the lawsonite-eclogite xenoliths, the lawsonite grains are invariably rimmed by zoisite, and, in the zoisite-eclogite xenoliths, the lawsonite is totally replaced by zoisite. Although similar replacement reactions of