Skip Navigation


Journal of Petrology Advance Access originally published online on April 7, 2006
Journal of Petrology 2006 47(8):1531-1555; doi:10.1093/petrology/egl019
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/8/1531    most recent
egl019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BERLY, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by LAPIERRE, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Supra-subduction Zone Pyroxenites from San Jorge and Santa Isabel (Solomon Islands)

THOMAS J. BERLY1,2, JÖRG HERMANN3, RICHARD J. ARCULUS1,* and HENRIETTE LAPIERRE2,{dagger}

1 DEPARTMENT OF EARTH AND MARINE SCIENCES, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY CANBERRA, A.C.T. 0200, AUSTRALIA
2 LABORATOIRE DE GEODYNAMIQUE DES CHAINES ALPINES, UNIVERSITE JOSEPH FOURIER 38400, ST. MARTIN D'HERES, FRANCE
3 RESEARCH SCHOOL OF EARTH SCIENCES, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY CANBERRA, A.C.T. 0200, AUSTRALIA

RECEIVED APRIL 23, 2006; ACCEPTED MARCH 10, 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Peridotites associated with pyroxenites (with rare olivine and spinel) are exposed on the islands of San Jorge and Santa Isabel in the Solomon Islands. Orthopyroxenite occurs in large outcrops (≤100 m2) whereas websterite and clinopyroxenite occur as layers and veins/dykes in peridotites. The bulk compositions of the pyroxenites are characterized by high Mg2+/(Mg2+ + Fe2+) (0·78–0·91) and low Al2O3 (<2·7 wt %). Low rare earth element abundances are coupled with large ion lithophile element enrichments and positive Sr and Pb anomalies (primitive mantle-normalized) relative to adjacent rare earths. Temperatures of equilibration for the pyroxenites are between 950 and 1050°C. These relatively low temperatures, combined with the occurrence of primary fluid inclusions, suggest that the pyroxenites formed by interaction of peridotite protoliths with an aqueous fluid. Bulk-rock and mineral compositions of the orthopyroxenites are similar to those of mantle-derived pyroxenites, whereas the websterites have closer chemical affinity with crustal arc cumulates. Nevertheless, field relationships plus petrological, textural and geochemical evidence are consistent with formation of all pyroxenite types in supra-subduction zone mantle, resulting from metasomatism of peridotite by subducted Pacific Plate-derived fluid. Such a setting for pyroxenite has not previously been reported in detail. We propose that these processes produce mantle pyroxenite with compositions similar to crustal pyroxenite.

KEY WORDS: mantle metasomatism; pyroxenite; supra-subduction zone


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Pyroxenites are ultramafic rocks that generally occur in two distinct settings: (1) as veins/dykes in various mantle peridotite lithologies (including xenoliths and ultramafic complexes) on a variety of scales; (2) as cumulates formed in crustal magma chambers. Orthopyroxenite, websterite and clinopyroxenite probably represent <5% of the upper mantle (Fabriès et al., 1991Go; Hirschmann & Stolper, 1996Go). Crustal pyroxenites, on the other hand, are dominantly cumulate clinopyroxenites and are commonly found in arc environments (Schiano et al., 2000Go) as relatively large volumes of cumulates from primitive island arc magmas in crustal magma chambers (DeBari & Coleman, 1989Go; Schiano et al., 2000Go). However, little is known about possible pyroxenites in the mantle wedge between the subducted slab and the base of the arc lithosphere. On the basis of peridotite xenoliths found in Lihir and Tubaf (volcanoes located to the rear of the New Britain–Bougainville arc of Papua New Guinea), McInnes et al. (2001)Go suggested that pyroxenites might be common in supra-subduction zone (SSZ) settings, but detailed studies of coherent bodies have not been reported.

Several processes have been proposed for the genesis of these different types of pyroxenite. Field, geochemical and experimental studies have shown that clinopyroxene can be a liquidus phase in various basalt magma types, and high-pressure mineral segregation from primitive magmas can result in the formation of massif pyroxenite (DeBari & Coleman, 1989Go; Girardeau & Ibarguchi, 1991Go; Pearson et al., 1993Go; Müntener et al., 2001Go; Parlak et al., 2002Go; Santos et al., 2002Go). Alternatively, recycling of elongated slices of subducted oceanic lithosphere through the convective mantle may also result in pyroxenite formation (Polvé & Allègre, 1980Go; Allègre & Turcotte, 1986Go; Hamelin & Allègre, 1988Go; Kornprobst et al., 1990Go; Kerr et al., 1995Go). Although these two processes can explain a wide spectrum of occurrence, they are unable to explain crosscutting networks of pyroxenite veins in mantle peridotites. In such settings, many researchers have proposed pyroxenite originates from melt/fluid–rock reaction in the upper mantle (Kelemen et al., 1992Go; Smith & Riter, 1997Go; Wilkinson & Stolz, 1997Go; Garrido & Bodinier, 1999Go; Smith et al., 1999Go; Zanetti et al., 1999Go; McInnes et al., 2001Go; Wang et al., 2001Go).

In this paper, we combine a field study with petrological, mineralogical and geochemical investigations in order to characterize pyroxenites exposed on the islands of San Jorge and Santa Isabel (Solomon Islands). The pyroxenites crop out in a boundary zone between the Ontong–Java Plateau (OJP) and the Solomon arc. Our primary aim is to determine whether these pyroxenites formed in an SSZ mantle setting or beneath the OJP. We document the mineralogical and chemical characteristics of the San Jorge and Santa Isabel pyroxenites, and compare these with typical mantle and crustal pyroxenites. We then discuss the processes responsible for the formation and the exhumation of pyroxenite in the Solomon Islands specifically.


    GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The location of the Solomon Islands in the SW Pacific is shown in Fig. 1. The Solomon Islands comprise a linear, NW–SE-trending double chain of islands including as major islands in the northeastern chain Choiseul, Santa Isabel and Malaita, and in the southwestern chain the New Georgia Group with the adjacent volcanically active forearc region, Guadalcanal and Makira (Petterson et al., 1999Go) (Fig. 1). The Solomons are bounded by two trench systems: the fossil Vitiaz Trench to the NE, and the South Solomon Trench System (SSTS) in the SW, marking the present collision zone between the Australian and Pacific plates. The Vitiaz Trench in the Solomons region is now blocked by the OJP, and the complicated geological history of the Solomon Islands is caused, in part, by the collision between the Plateau and the Solomon arc (Petterson et al., 1997Go; Mann & Taira, 2004Go).


Figure 1
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1 Geological terrane model of the Solomon Islands after Petterson et al. (1999)Go, constructed on the basis of distinctive lithologies, ages and geochemistry of basement sequences, and the existence of arc sequences. At least two active volcanoes (Kana Keoki and Coleman) are located within the area denoted as New Georgia Forearc. Location of Fig. 2 is shown by the rectangle.

 
The Alaska-size OJP is the largest-known oceanic plateau (estimated volume >5 x 107 km3) (Coffin & Eldholm, 1994Go), and is believed to have formed from a mantle plume (Ely & Neal, 2003Go). From the time of the OJP–Solomon arc contact in the Pliocene, according to Cowley et al. (2004)Go, subduction of the Pacific Plate terminated progressively along the Vitiaz Trench from north of Bougainville through the Solomons and Vanuatu (Mann et al., 1996Go; Cowley et al., 2004Go). In response to this collision, subduction of the Indo-Australian Plate northeastwards along the SSTS was initiated (Fig. 1).

On the basis of different lithological assemblages, the Solomon Islands have been subdivided into several provinces (Coleman, 1965Go) or terranes (Petterson et al., 1999Go). Those terranes with a major, Cretaceous-aged, component comprise, according to Petterson et al. (1999)Go (Fig. 1): (1) a plume-related (OJP) terrane including Malaita, Ulawa and the northeastern part of Santa Isabel; (2) a mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB) terrane including much of Choiseul and Guadalcanal; (3), a hybrid terrane including both MORB and plume components forming Makira. Two stages of Tertiary arc development are recognized: Stage 1 from the Eocene to Miocene, including the Shortland Islands and southern part of Santa Isabel, shown as Terrane 4 in Fig. 1; Stage 2 from the Late Pliocene/Early Pleistocene to the present day, including the active volcanoes of the New Georgia Group (Rohrbach et al., 2005) and adjacent forearc, shown as Terrane 5 in Fig. 1.

As a result of the OJP–Solomon arc collision, the leading edge of the OJP began to be exhumed and portions are now exposed in the islands of Santa Isabel, Malaita, Ulawa and Makira (Petterson et al., 1997Go). These uplifted, overthrust, largely unmetamorphosed portions of the OJP were termed the Pacific Province by Coleman (1965)Go. Thin fault-bounded slices of peridotite associated with pyroxenite occur on the SW margin of the exposed OJP on the southern part of Santa Isabel and the island of San Jorge (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2 Simplified geological map of the SE portion of Santa Isabel and the island of San Jorge after Hawkins & Barron (1991). Italicized numbers next to the field locations are samples described in the text. KKKFS, Kia–Korigole–Kaipito Fault System.

 

    THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA ISABEL AND SAN JORGE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The geology of Santa Isabel and San Jorge is shown in Fig. 2. At the southern end of Santa Isabel, a major portion of the outcrop comprises Sigana Basalts; these are pillow lavas of the OJP. They comprise low-K tholeiites that are petrologically and geochemically similar to lavas recovered by deep-sea drilling of the OJP (Neal et al., 1997). The Sigana Basalts are separated from Terrane 4 by a major suture—the Kia–Korigole–Kaipito Fault System (KKKFS) (Stanton, 1961Go), which is known through seismic survey to extend offshore (Cowley et al., 2004Go). Along the KKKFS, thin fault-bound slices of peridotite are distributed on both sides of the fault system (Fig. 2). The ultramafic rocks consist of a series of elongate pods of more or less serpentinized harzburgite and dunite, cut by pyroxenite veins. However, the relationships between these ultramafic rocks and other rock formations (particularly the OJP basalts) are generally not well exposed. Only in two locations (Tanabuli Island and Kolare Island) is a small faulted contact between peridotite and OJP basalts exposed, perhaps indicative of a lack of genetic relationships.

On San Jorge, pillowed and massive flows of basaltic to andesitic lavas (the San Jorge Volcanics) are associated with micro- to medium-grained gabbros (the Kolose'eru Gabbros). All of these rock types are part of the Jajao Igneous Suite (Tejada et al., 1996Go), with ages in the range 62–46 Ma. They are petrographically, chemically and isotopically distinct compared with the OJP Sigana basalts, and are suggested to represent fragments of uplifted ocean floor formed in an arc–back-arc system (Tejada et al., 1996Go). In the region of Loguhutu Bay (the southern coast of San Jorge), they are exposed in fault contact with a large body of pyroxenite-veined peridotite (Fig. 2).

The northern part of San Jorge consists of a large domal mass of brecciated and flow-banded serpentine and serpentinous mud, analogous to the diapirs documented along the length of the Izu–Bonin–Mariana forearcs by Fryer et al. (1985)Go. This serpentinite dome encloses blocks of very fresh pyroxenite as well as fresh to variably altered harzburgite at Rata Bay (Fig. 2).


    PERIDOTITE–PYROXENITE FIELD RELATIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The San Jorge and Santa Isabel websterites and clinopyroxenites generally occur as layers and veins/dykes with sharp contacts in host harzburgites and dunites (Fig. 3a). No lherzolites have been found. The harzburgites and dunites are variably serpentinized and some are deformed. However, the pyroxenite veins remain surprisingly fresh, varying from orthopyroxene- to clinopyroxene-rich in composition. The pyroxenite layers are generally subparallel to the foliation of their host ultramafic rocks. Conversely, the veins/dykes are organized in a multi-generational network crosscutting the host peridotites (Fig. 3b). The thickness of these pyroxenites is variable, ranging from ~1 cm to ~30 cm. Veins or dykes are occasionally folded and sheared.


Figure 3
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3 Field photographs showing the relationship between pyroxenite veins and host peridotites. (a) Harzburgite boulder crosscut by two parallel veins of websterite at Padeai Point (San Jorge). Length of hammer is 50 cm. (b) Outcrop of harzburgite exposed on the south side of the KKKFS (Sandy Point, Santa Isabel), showing different generations of websterite veins crosscutting each other. Length of hammer head is 18 cm.

 
On Santa Isabel, the pyroxenites are exposed on both sides of the KKKFS. The clinopyroxene-rich rocks, including websterites and clinopyroxenites, seem to be more abundant than the orthopyroxene-rich samples. On San Jorge, the pyroxenites occur in two locations: at the southern end of the island, where they are incorporated into an ultramafic massif, and in northern San Jorge, where they crop out in a serpentine diapir. At Johnson Point (Fig. 2), the orthopyroxenite outcrops over an area of about 100 m2 without any clear relation with the neighbouring peridotite. Websterite is abundant as beach cobbles and pebbles, particularly in the vicinity of the southern ultramafic massif.


    ANALYTICAL METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Whole-rock analysis
Whole-rock analyses of 18 representative pyroxenites, sampled from different locations on Santa Isabel and San Jorge, were carried out using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) to determine their major element compositions. Weathered surfaces from samples were removed and then the samples were crushed into fine chips and finally pulverized to a <10 µm powder in an agate mill. Powders were fused into glass discs following the standard procedures employed for XRF analysis (Norrish & Hutton, 1969Go). All the analyses of Li-borate fusion discs were conducted using a Phillips PW2400 spectrometer for major elements according to the method of Norrish & Hutton (1969)Go. Loss on ignition (LOI) was determined separately by heating at 1100°C for 1 h.

Trace element concentrations were measured with two types of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) techniques. The solution ICP-MS VG PlasmaQuad (PQ Turbo Plus) of the University of Montpellier (France) has been tuned and calibrated according to Ionov et al. (1992)Go with special care for minimizing memory effects during the determination of very low trace element contents. BIR-1 was the standard used. Sample preparation for the solution ICP-MS was carried out in a ‘cleanroom’ following the procedures of Barrat et al. (1996)Go. A laser ablation (LA) ICP-MS system, consisting of an ArF (193 nm) EXCIMER laser coupled with an Agilent 7500s ICP-MS system, was used to analyse trace element concentrations on fused discs, following the protocol of Eggins et al. (1997)Go. Fused discs made for XRF purposes were glued together in stacks of 10, set in epoxy resin blocks, displayed as a sandwich in cross-section, polished, and the laser beam (100 µm in diameter) rastered along the length of each disc. The trace element concentrations obtained using the two types of ICP-MS techniques (solution and laser ablation) are very similar.

Mineral analysis
A Cameca Microbeam electron microprobe analyser (EMPA) and a JEOL 6400 scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to measure major element concentrations in all silicate and oxide phases. Major elements were routinely analysed with energy-dispersive spectrometry on the SEM, operated at 15 kV acceleration voltage, with a beam current of 1 nA. A focused beam (nominal width of 1 µm) was normally used but a defocused beam (20–30 µm spot size) was also used for pyroxene with exsolution lamellae. Minor elements were additionally analysed with wavelength-dispersive spectrometry on the EMPA using an acceleration voltage of 15 kV and a beam current of 20 nA. Mineral analyses were assisted by backscattered electron-imaging for textural control.


    PETROGRAPHY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The 18 pyroxenite samples from San Jorge and Santa Isabel have variable mineralogies and have been classified into three groups with respect to the proportions of orthopyroxene:clinopyroxene as follows: Group 1 (G1), orthopyroxenites (orthopyroxene > 80%); Group 2 (G2), websterites (60% < clinopyroxene < 80%) and (orthopyroxene > 10%); Group 3 (G3), clinopyroxenites (clinopyroxene >80%). Tables 1 and 2 summarize the modes and petrographic features of these pyroxenites.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1: Petrological and mineralogical characteristics of the San Jorge and Santa Isabel pyroxenites

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2: Mineral assemblages in the San Jorge and Santa Isabel pyroxenites

 
Primary assemblages
The major phase assemblages are dominated by clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene with minor amounts of olivine and spinel. The fabric of the pyroxenites varies from large grains of approximately equal size in a fine-grained matrix (inequigranular) to complete gradation of fine- to coarse-grained fabric (seriate) (Moore, 1970Go). The grain boundaries range between straight and lobate. Lobate grain boundaries are consistent with dynamic recrystallization, indicative of relatively high-temperature conditions (Passchier & Trouw, 1996Go). Exsolution textures in these rocks demonstrate that after initial crystallization, the pyroxenes re-equilibrated to lower temperatures. Intragranular clusters of fluid inclusions are found trapped in clinopyroxene crystals remote from grain boundaries. They are interpreted to represent primary fluid inclusions and are consistent with the presence of fluid during clinopyroxene growth (Van Den Kerkhof & Hein, 2001Go). Although the mineralogy of the three petrographic groups of pyroxenites seems to be relatively simple, it is nevertheless possible to discern a complex poly-stage history of pyroxene growth and equilibration. For example, within websterites and clinopyroxenites, small (<0·2 mm) relics of optically continuous orthopyroxene occur surrounded by modally predominant clinopyroxene (Fig. 4a). At a macroscopic level, the invasion of a pre-existing peridotitic mantle assemblage by pyroxene veins is clear (Fig. 3). Figure 4b illustrates some microscopic effects at the contact between a dunite and an invasive clinopyroxenite.


Figure 4
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4 Photomicrographs with crossed polarizers. (a) Replacement texture of a websterite (sample 16.09; Salavo Bay, San Jorge). cpx, clinopyroxene; opx, orthopyroxene; R, relict of mantle orthopyroxene. (b) Contact between clinopyroxenite (vein) and a dunite; sample 15.13 taken at Mbadhambani Pt, Santa Isabel. Sample is also crossed by late-stage serpentine veins.

 
In the orthopyroxenites, the orthopyroxene generally occurs either as large subhedral grains with lobate grain boundaries or as small grains. The large orthopyroxene grains exhibit abundant exsolution lamellae of clinopyroxene, whereas the small orthopyroxene crystals have few exsolution lamellae. Clinopyroxene makes up a maximum 15% modal proportion of these rocks. The clinopyroxene grains are characterized by relatively small sizes (10–400 µm across) with anhedral crystal shapes, and typically have orthopyroxene exsolution lamellae. Spinel is a common minor phase in the orthopyroxenites but with a limited modal abundance (<2%). Spinel forms discrete subhedral rhombs at grain boundaries or is included in large orthopyroxene grains. Olivine occurs rarely except in sample 18.03, where it constitutes 20 modal %.

The websterites are distinct from the orthopyroxenites in having clinopyroxene:orthopyroxene >1. The size of the grains is also generally more homogeneous than in orthopyroxenites (i.e. 1–2 mm across). Exsolution lamellae of orthopyroxene occur in clinopyroxene grains, but are very limited. No exsolution of clinopyroxene has been observed in any orthopyroxene grain. The websterites are devoid of spinel. Olivine appears rarely except in sample 14.04, which contains about 15 modal %, present as interstitial anhedral grains between pyroxene crystals.

The texture of the clinopyroxenites is typically seriate with large subhedral grains (1–5 mm in size) enclosed in a mosaic of fine-grained clinopyroxene (200 µm across). Clinopyroxene grains have small (<10 µm) aligned needles of exsolved spinel, some of which is accompanied by orthopyroxene exsolution blebs. Only small amounts (<10 modal %) of orthopyroxene and/or olivine occur as small interstitial grains or as inclusions in clinopyroxene.

Retrograde assemblages
Amphibole is a common retrograde phase in all the pyroxenites, but rarely exceeds 2% of the mode. Texturally, amphibole occurs as an interstitial phase between interlocking pyroxene crystals, and can appear as blebs, mainly within clinopyroxene. Amphibole streaks or flames are generally very small (<10 µm in length), but can be highly concentrated within clinopyroxene, giving a poikilitic aspect to the pyroxene crystals. Amphibole in pyroxene is typically accompanied by secondary fluid inclusions. These fluid inclusions form trails crosscutting grain boundaries, consistent with entrapment after the growth of the host clinopyroxene, and possibly contemporaneous with growth of amphibole. Interstitial amphibole is associated with grains of Fe-sulphide (pyrite and pyrrhotite) and Ni-sulphide; the sulphide appears to be in textural equilibrium with the amphibole. Anhedral Fe-sulphide is also present in late-stage cracks.

Magnetite only appears in trace amounts, and is often closely associated with amphibole. Tiny anhedral magnetite grains, as small as 1 µm in maximum dimension, have crystallized at the periphery of amphibole blebs and grains. Magnetite also occurs in late cracks crossing all of the minerals. Thin rims of serpentine surround many orthopyroxene and olivine grains, but the majority of the pyroxenites have <1% serpentine. In some samples of orthopyroxenite (samples 16.05, 16.19 and 18.03), serpentine forms veins crosscutting all the phases and is presumably related to late-stage alteration. Wollastonite (CaSiO3) is present in the most altered orthopyroxenite (sample 16.19), and accompanies late-stage vein serpentinization. Chlorite is very limited and only occurs in the serpentine matrix in one clinopyroxenite (sample 15.11). Pectolite [Ca2NaH(SiO3)3] is present in samples 16.05 (G1) and 18.08 (G2) in association with serpentine veins (16.05) and late amphibole (18.08), indicating a late-stage alteration paragenesis. Secondary clinopyroxene is also present in orthopyroxenite 16.05, occurring in veins developed syn- to post-serpentinization.


    MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Orthopyroxene
Representative orthopyroxene compositions are given in Table 3. Their CaO contents are relatively low (<1 wt %). The Mg2+/(Mg2+ + {sigma}Fe as Fe2+) (Mg-number) of orthopyroxene in the orthopyroxenites is comparable with accepted mantle values, ranging from 0·88 to 0·91. In contrast, the Mg-number values for orthopyroxene in websterites are lower, between 0·84 and 0·86 (Fig. 5). The Al2O3 contents of orthopyroxene are all low, averaging 1·37 wt % in a range from 0·45 to 2·35 wt %; the highest concentration is in orthopyroxene from sample 16.11 (Fig. 5a). Overall, a positive correlation between Cr2O3 content and Mg-number is observed in orthopyroxene, although within groups this is not obvious, except possibly in the websterites. The Cr2O3 contents reach 0·64 wt % (for Mg-number = 0·91) in the orthopyroxenites, and decreases to 0·04 wt % (Mg-number = 0·79) in the websterites (Fig. 5b).


Figure 5
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5 Al2O3 and Cr2O3 vs Mg-number for the orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene in the different pyroxenites (in this and succeeding figures indicated as: G1, orthopyroxenite; G2, websterite; G3, clinopyroxenite). Secondary clinopyroxene (Cpx II) is indicated by a cross.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3: Representative analyses of orthopyroxene and calculated end-member compositions

 
Clinopyroxene
Primary clinopyroxene
Clinopyroxene has limited compositional variation (Table 4). The Mg-number decreases in the same general order as in orthopyroxene (orthopyroxenite > clinopyroxenite > websterite), consistent with equilibrium between the respective pyroxenes (Fig. 5a). As is the case with orthopyroxene, the Al2O3 contents of clinopyroxene remain unchanged with decreasing Mg-number (Fig. 5a). Consistent with the coexisting orthopyroxene, the highest Al2O3 content (2·6 wt %) is present in clinopyroxene of orthopyroxenite 16.11; the Al2O3 contents of the other clinopyroxenes average 1·5 wt %. Cr2O3 correlates positively with Mg-number (Fig. 5b). Whereas the Cr2O3 contents of clinopyroxene from orthopyroxenite and clinopyroxenite are relatively high (Cr2O3 > 0·3) for a given Mg-number (~0·92), those in websterite have both lower Cr2O3 and Mg-number (Fig. 5b).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4: Representative analyses of clinopyroxene and calculated end-member compositions

 
Secondary clinopyroxene
The secondary clinopyroxene (Cpx II) (Table 2) is chemically distinct from the primary clinopyroxene in having lower Al2O3 (0·23 wt %), and lower Cr2O3 (0·18 wt %) contents compared with primary clinopyroxene with similar Mg-number (Fig. 5b).

Olivine
Olivine grains are compositionally unzoned and homogeneous within individual samples. Representative olivine compositions are given in Table 5. Within all pyroxenites, forsterite (Fo) contents range from 76·5 to 90·3 mol %, with a high average of 87·4%. A plot of NiO vs Mg-number shows that the olivine in orthopyroxenite has a high Fo (~89) and NiO content (0·42 wt %) (Fig. 6) comparable with olivine from upper mantle peridotites (Girardeau & Ibarguchi, 1991Go). In contrast, olivine in websterite has much lower Mg-number and NiO concentrations. Although the Fo and NiO contents of olivine in websterite average 86 and 0·39 wt % respectively, olivine from sample 15.03 has markedly low Fo (~76·8) as well as a very low NiO content (0·15 wt %). Olivine in clinopyroxenite is generally similar in terms of major elements (Fo88) to olivine in orthopyroxenite, but has lower NiO (0·22 wt %). All olivine seems to be in equilibrium with clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene, as the Fo content correlates positively with the Mg-number of clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene (Fig. 7).


Figure 6
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6 NiO vs mol % forsterite in olivine. Field of the Cabo Ortegal peridotitic olivine (diagonal shading) is from Girardeau & Ibarguchi (1991)Go.

 


Figure 7
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7 Mg-number in orthopyroxene, olivine and amphibole vs Mg-number in clinopyroxene in the same rock.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5: Representative analyses of olivine

 
Spinel
Representative chromian spinel compositions are presented in Table 6. Only spinel from ortho- and clinopyroxenites is plotted as no spinel was found in the websterites. Spinel is characterized by high molar Cr/(Cr + Al) (Cr-number) (Fig. 8). In the clinopyroxenites, individual spinel grains and exsolution blebs have similar compositions. On a plot of Cr-number vs Mg-number (Fig. 8), the spinel plots at higher Cr-number and lower Mg-number than the abyssal peridotite array (Dick & Bullen, 1984Go). Spinels in the ortho- and clinopyroxenites overlap in terms of Cr-number but also extend to lower Mg-number than spinel from the SSZ peridotite suite of the Izu–Bonin forearc peridotites (Parkinson & Pearce, 1998Go).


Figure 8
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8 Cr/(Cr + Al) (Cr-number) vs Mg-number for spinel in the ortho- and clinopyroxenites. The field for abyssal peridotites is from Dick & Bullen (1984)Go. Field for Izu–Bonin (SSZ) peridotites is from Parkinson & Pearce (1998)Go.

 
Amphibole
The composition of amphibole ranges from calcic hornblende to tremolite (Table 7, Fig. 9). Hornblende has low TiO2 (<0·2 wt %) and K2O (<0·2 wt %), and intermediate Cr2O3 (0·84–0·99 wt %) and Na2O (0·87–1·5 wt %) (Table 7). The Al2O3 content is relatively high, ranging from 5·66 to 11·44 wt % for the magnesio-hornblende and between 1·49 and 6·06 wt % for the tremolitic-hornblende. Some magnesio-hornblende from spinel-bearing orthopyroxenite is enriched in Cr2O3 (2·38–3·12 wt %). Tremolite has a low Al2O3 content (2·2–4·3 wt %) as well as low Na2O (0·37 wt % on average), but relatively high Cr2O3 (0·93 wt % on average). In a plot of Mg-number (clinopyroxene vs amphibole), the scatter of the data suggests that only partial equilibrium between amphibole and pyroxene has been achieved, consistent with a retrograde origin for the amphibole (Fig. 7).


Figure 9
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9 (Na + K) in site A vs Al(IV) for amphiboles after the classification of amphiboles by Leake (1978)Go.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6: Representative spinel analyses

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7: Representative analyses of amphibole

 

    CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF THE PYROXENITES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Temperature
The equilibrium coexistence of clino- and orthopyroxene permits estimation of the temperatures of equilibration of the pyroxenites, using the conventional two-pyroxene thermometer of Wells (1977). The three groups of pyroxenite are estimated to have equilibrated at temperatures between 810°C and 935°C (Fig. 10a). The average temperatures calculated for orthopyroxenite (870°C), websterite (890°C), and clinopyroxenite (900°C) (Fig. 10b) are within error, probably not distinguishable, and provide evidence for recrystallization at 850–900°C. These recrystallization temperatures are consistent with the occurrence of lobate grain boundaries, indicating that deformation has occurred at relatively high temperatures.


Figure 10
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10 Calculated temperatures of pyroxene formation and equilibration using the two-pyroxene thermometer of Wells (1977)Go. (a) Calculation of equilibration and crystallization temperatures for individual samples. (b) Average calculated temperatures of equilibration and crystallization. Shaded bars represent the temperatures calculated directly from coexisting pyroxenes whereas the double-headed arrows provide an estimate of the original crystallization temperatures. The latter have been determined using compositions recalculated from grains displaying exsolution lamellae (see text for details).

 
There is evidence of previous higher-temperature histories preserved within some of the pyroxenites, given the presence of exsolution textures. Two methods were used to integrate the exsolution lamellae into the pyroxene analyses to estimate original temperatures of crystallization. The first method consisted of analysing large host-lamellae areas by scanning the beam over a 103 µm2 area to restore the bulk composition of the pyroxene prior to exsolution. In the second method, an image corresponding to the area analysed by the first method was taken and analysed using a Geographic Information System technique, using ER Mapper software, to quantify the area that the exsolution lamellae represent relative to the host pyroxene. Then the relative areas were combined with spot analyses of the single phases to recalculate the original pyroxene composition. Both methods indicate that in orthopyroxenite up to 8% of exsolution lamellae are present. Consequently, the recalculated temperature of crystallization is significantly higher, and reaches an average of 990°C (Fig. 10b). A temperature of 950°C was obtained from restored pyroxene analyses from websterites; generally pyroxene in websterite has less exsolution lamellae than in orthopyroxenite, and thus the temperature of original pyroxene formation is closer to the temperature of recrystallization. The clinopyroxenites yield a slightly higher average temperature of 1050°C. A higher temperature of formation for clinopyroxenite is in agreement with the presence of abundant spinel exsolution, a feature not present in orthopyroxenite and websterite.

Pressure
The absence of plagioclase and garnet, together with the presence of spinel, in both pyroxenites and surrounding peridotites constrains the depth of origin of the pyroxenites to be within the stability field of spinel peridotite. Rough estimates of pressure for the pyroxenites can be assessed by the absence of garnet. As garnet is stable to lower pressure in pyroxenite than in peridotite (Ho et al., 2000Go), these pyroxenites must have equilibrated at pressures <1·7 GPa. Experiments on natural pyroxenites (Irving, 1974Go; Hirschmann & Stolper, 1996Go) estimate that 1·3–1·7 GPa corresponds to the low-pressure stability limit for garnet at the solidus.


    BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Major elements
Overall the pyroxenites are characterized by high Mg-number ranging from 0·83 to 0·92 (Tables 1 and 8;Fig. 11a–d). The orthopyroxenites and clinopyroxenites tend to have higher Mg-numbers than the websterites. As might be anticipated, in a plot of CaO vs Mg-number (Fig. 11a), the orthopyroxenites are clearly distinctive compared with the websterites and clinopyroxenites. In addition, the websterites differ from the clinopyroxenites by having a wider range in Mg-number over a similar range of CaO contents.


Figure 11
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11 Variation of wt % CaO (a), Al2O3 (b), Cr2O3 (c) and TiO2 (d) vs Mg-number for the whole-rock pyroxenites. In (b), the values of Al2O3 and Mg-number (2·7 wt % and 0·88, respectively) for orthopyroxenite 16.11 are off-scale.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8: Whole-rock major element compositions

 
The pyroxenites are characterized by low Al2O3 contents (0·6–2·7 wt %) regardless of Mg-number, and no correlation exists within any group between the Mg-number and Al2O3 (Fig. 11b). Orthopyroxenite sample 16.11 has the highest Al2O3 (2·7 wt %), whereas other pyroxenites average 1·5 wt % Al2O3. In contrast, a positive correlation exists between Mg-number and Cr2O3 contents, particularly for the websterites (Fig. 5c). Orthopyroxenites with high modal spinel proportions (samples 16.05, 16.19 and 18.03) (Table 1) are clearly offset from the other samples in terms of higher Cr2O3 contents at equivalent Mg-number. The TiO2 contents are negatively correlated with Mg-number for orthopyroxenite and websterite, ranging from 0·02 wt % (Mg-number = 0·91) to 0·08 (Mg-number = 0·83) (Fig. 11d). In this case, the TiO2 contents of the clinopyroxenite samples (~0·18 wt %) are much higher than for the other groups.

Trace elements
Rare earth elements
The various pyroxenite groups have distinctive chondrite-normalized (indicated by subscript N) rare earth element (REE) abundance patterns (Fig. 12a) with consistent light (L)REE depletion accompanied by overall low relative REE abundances (Table 9). The orthopyroxenites have very low heavy (H)REE contents (YbN = 0·2–0·8) and a steady decrease from the HREE to middle (M)REE (GdN = 0·04–0·16). The LREE (La–Eu) contents typically proved difficult to analyse because their concentrations are below the ICP-MS detection limits.


Figure 12
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12 (a) Chondrite-normalized whole-rock REE patterns for representative pyroxenites from San Jorge and Santa Isabel. Chondrite values are from Sun & McDonough (1989)Go. (b) Primitive mantle-normalized, whole-rock multi-element patterns for representative pyroxenites from San Jorge and Santa Isabel. Primitive mantle values are from Sun & McDonough (1989)Go.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9: Whole-rock trace element compositions

 
The HREE abundances in the websterites and clinopyroxenites are also strikingly low (YbN between 0·4 and 2) (Fig. 12a) despite the high modal proportions of clinopyroxene. These clinopyroxene-rich rocks have convex-upward REEN patterns with depleted LREE relative to MREE, and relatively flat HREE–MREE gradients [(Gd/Yb)N ~1]. Two websterites (samples 14.16 and 18.08) are distinctive with unusual bell-shaped REEN patterns, characterized by enrichment in the MREE relative to both LREE and HREE [(Gd/Yb)N = 1·4–1·6]. The olivine-rich websterite sample 14.16 is also distinct from other websterites by having extremely low HREE abundances.

The REEN patterns of the clinopyroxenites are also bell-shaped, similar to those of websterites 14.16 and 18.08. However, the REE concentrations of the clinopyroxenites are higher than those of the orthopyroxenites and websterites with CeN = 0·7–1·1, GdN = 2·3–3·3 and YbN in the range 1·6–2·3 (Fig. 12a).

Other trace elements
Primitive mantle-normalized, multi-element patterns for the three pyroxenite groups are characterized overall by large ion lithophile element (LILE) enrichments relative to REE (except for clinopyroxenites), and in particular, positive Pb and Sr anomalies relative to neighbouring REE (Ce and Nd, respectively) (Fig. 12b). There is no correlation between the LOI and LILE (e.g. Cs, Rb, Ba, Pb, and variably Sr) abundances, indicating that the increases in LILE concentrations relative to the REE are not due to low-temperature alteration. Furthermore, the positive Sr anomalies relative to neighbouring REE elements are not correlated with positive Eu anomalies.

Despite some overall similarities, the three pyroxenite groups also differ from each other in terms of specific LILE and high field strength element (HFSE) abundance systematics. For example, the orthopyroxenites are distinctive from the other pyroxenite groups in terms of: (1) marked enrichments of Cs and Ba relative to Rb; (2) strikingly positive Pb and Sr spikes relative to Ce and Nd; (3) positive Ti spikes relative to Eu and Gd; (4) absence of negative Zr and Hf anomalies relative to Nd and Sm. It is also noteworthy that the absolute abundances of Cs, Ba, Pb and Sr are highest in the orthopyroxenites (Table 9, Fig. 12b).

The websterites and clinopyroxenites have similar primitive mantle-normalized multi-element patterns, with particularly variable negative anomalies in Nb relative to La [(Nb/La)N <1] (Fig. 12b). In more detail, the clinopyroxenites are more enriched in REE, Ti, Zr and Hf than the websterites (Fig. 12b). Whereas positive Pb and negative Ti anomalies are present in the clinopyroxenites, only small positive Sr anomalies exist.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Arc- or plume-related pyroxenites?
The occurrence of peridotites associated with pyroxenites on Santa Isabel and San Jorge, at the boundary zone between arc- and OJP-related rock suites, gives no clear evidence as to the provenance(s) of these ultramafic rocks. Based on geochemical and geophysical arguments, it has been speculated that ‘hidden’ cumulates in the crust of the OJP form the major part of its huge thickness (Neal et al., 1997Go). Exposures of these rock types have not yet been identified. As the OJP supposedly represents the products of a mantle plume head (Coffin & Eldholm, 1994Go), its lower cumulative part should be generated from hot primitive magma.

Estimates of temperatures of crystallization indicate that the Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites were formed at temperatures of about 1000°C (and not exceeding 1050°C) before being partially re-equilibrated at 880–900°C on average. This range of temperatures indicates that the pyroxenites originated in a relatively cold environment that is incompatible with the high temperatures expected for OJP-related pyroxenite cumulates. Whereas the OJP magmas were supposed to be generated in a relatively H2O-poor environment, the presence of primary fluid inclusions in the Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites may indicate involvement of a H2O-rich fluid at some stage in their development. Together, these features are more consistent with an arc-related origin for the pyroxenites in Santa Isabel and San Jorge.

A subduction-related origin for the pyroxenites is further supported by mineral and bulk-rock compositions. The high Cr-number in spinel has been suggested by many workers (Bonatti & Michael, 1989Go; Kausar, 1998Go; Wang et al., 2001Go) to be characteristic of spinels from a subduction setting. Spinel from the ortho- and clinopyroxenites is similar in terms of Mg-number and Cr-number to spinel formed in SSZ mantle rocks (Fig. 8). Bulk-rock compositions, moreover, are relatively enriched in LILE, Sr and Pb (Fig. 12b). These elements are well known to be mobile in subduction zone environments (Tatsumi et al., 1986Go; McCulloch & Gamble, 1991Go; Brenan et al., 1995Go; Keppler, 1996Go; Ayers et al., 1997Go). The San Jorge and Santa Isabel pyroxenites are similar in terms of their trace element characteristics to the SSZ-related Izu–Bonin peridotites (Fig. 12b) (Parkinson & Pearce, 1998Go).

All these lines of evidence are consistent with the hypothesis that formation of the San Jorge and Santa Isabel pyroxenites was related to subduction zone processes and not to the genesis of the OJP. The field observation that the pyroxenites occur mainly as veins and dykes within peridotites suggests that they formed in a SSZ mantle wedge rather than as cumulates formed at the base of an island arc crust. This hypothesis is supported by the finding of rare, relict orthopyroxene of mantle affinity within the pyroxenites.

Mantle vs crustal arc pyroxenites
We turn now to a comparison of ‘mantle’ vs ‘crustal’ pyroxenite characteristics, as outlined in the opening paragraph, with those of the SSZ pyroxenites documented here. It is appropriate to note that distinguishing between crust and mantle on the basis of seismic compressional wave velocities becomes somewhat arbitrary given velocities now acquired in the depth range 20–40 km beneath the Izu–Bonin and Aleutian arcs of ~7·6–8·0 km/s (Suyehiro et al., 1996Go; Fliedner & Klemperer, 1999Go). It is possible that these velocities correspond to clinopyroxenite and wehrlite lithologies formed through accumulation from primitive arc magmas, adjacent to the crust–mantle boundary.

Pyroxenites have been described from a number of arc environments such as the Alaskan complexes (Irving, 1974Go; DeBari et al., 1987Go; DeBari & Coleman, 1989Go), North America–Canada ultramafic rocks (Findlay, 1969Go; James, 1971Go; Quick, 1981Go; Snoke et al., 1981Go), intra-oceanic arc-related cumulates in southern New Zealand (Spandler et al., 2003Go), the deep crustal cumulates (in part, garnet-bearing) of the Jijal complex (Pakistan) (Jan & Howie, 1981Go; Kausar, 1998Go), the pyroxenite-rich peridotites from Cabo Ortegal (Spain) (Girardeau & Ibarguchi, 1991Go; Santos et al., 2002Go) and the Beni Bousera massif (Morocco) (Pearson et al., 1993Go). These are interpreted as medium- to high-pressure, ultramafic cumulates formed in mid- to lower crustal magma chambers, some spanning the crust–mantle boundary at the base of an arc (DeBari & Coleman, 1989Go).

Given the predominance of olivine and clinopyroxene as early-formed minerals in arc magmas, it follows that arc-related crustal pyroxenites are likely to be dominated by these phases, leading to high CaO at relatively low SiO2 contents in typical cumulate assemblages (Fig. 13a). Mantle-derived pyroxenites differ from arc crustal pyroxenites in having a wider range of CaO (18·5 to <5 wt %) (Hirschmann & Stolper, 1996Go). Mantle pyroxenites generally include a large variety of rock types ranging from orthopyroxenite through websterite to clinopyroxenite. The Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites are also characterized by mineralogical diversity similar to that of mantle-derived pyroxenites. In a CaO vs SiO2 diagram (Fig. 13a), the orthopyroxenite field overlaps that of mantle pyroxenite whereas websterites and clinopyroxenites span both the mantle and arc crustal fields. Arc crustal pyroxenite is characterized by a narrow range of Al2O3 contents compared with mantle pyroxenite (Fig. 13b). The Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites have low Al2O3 contents, coincident with the arc-related pyroxenite field. Orthopyroxenites and clinopyroxenites overlap the field of low-Al2O3 mantle pyroxenite, whereas websterites do not overlap that field (Fig. 13b).


Figure 13
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 13 Compositional data for whole-rock pyroxenites: (a) SiO2 vs CaO (wt %); (b) Mg-number vs Al2O3 (wt %). Reference fields are for arc-related peridotites (Parkinson & Pearce, 1998Go), mantle pyroxenites (Kornprobst, 1969Go; Irving, 1974Go, 1980Go; Frey, 1978Go; Sinigoi et al., 1980Go; Bodinier et al., 1987Go, 1988Go; Griffin et al., 1988Go; Piccardo et al., 1988Go; Seyler & Mattson, 1989Go, 1993Go; Shervais, 1990Go; Pearson et al., 1993Go; Rivalenti et al., 1995Go; Vaselli et al., 1995Go; Kumar et al., 1996Go; Wilkinson & Stolz, 1997Go; Garrido & Bodinier, 1999Go; Zanetti et al., 1999Go; McInnes et al., 2001Go) and arc-related crustal pyroxenites (Findlay, 1969Go; James, 1971Go; Jan & Howie, 1981Go; Quick, 1981Go; Snoke et al., 1981Go; DeBari & Coleman, 1989Go; Girardeau & Ibarguchi, 1991Go; Kausar, 1998Go; Smith et al., 1999Go; Parlak et al., 2002Go; Santos et al., 2002Go; Worden, 2002Go; Spandler et al., 2003Go).

 
A comparison of Al2O3 content vs Mg-number is shown in Fig. 14 between ortho- and clinopyroxene compositions in the Solomons and peridotites from Izu–Bonin, and the respective fields for mantle pyroxenites. The ortho- and clinopyroxenites of Santa Isabel and San Jorge have strong affinities with mantle-derived pyroxenites whereas the field of websterites overlaps the arc crustal pyroxenite field, and trends towards the more evolved arc-related mafic cumulates. More generally, there is close compositional similarity between the orthopyroxenites and the SSZ Izu–Bonin peridotites.


Figure 14
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 14 Al2O3 vs Mg-number for (a) orthopyroxene and (b) clinopyroxene; (c) Cr2O3 vs Mg-number in clinopyroxene. Reference fields are for arc-related peridotites (Parkinson & Pearce, 1998Go), mantle pyroxenites (Kornprobst, 1969Go; Irving, 1974Go, 1980Go; Frey & Prinz, 1978Go; Sinigoi et al., 1980Go; Bodinier et al., 1987Go, 1988Go; Griffin et al., 1988Go; Piccardo et al., 1988Go; Seyler & Mattson, 1989Go, 1993Go; Shervais, 1990Go; Pearson et al., 1993Go; Rivalenti et al., 1995Go; Vaselli et al., 1995Go; Kumar et al., 1996Go; Wilkinson & Stolz, 1997Go; Garrido & Bodinier, 1999Go; Zanetti et al., 1999Go; McInnes et al., 2001Go) and arc-related pyroxenites and mafic cumulates (Findlay, 1969Go; James, 1971Go; Jan & Howie, 1981Go; Quick, 1981Go; Snoke et al., 1981Go; DeBari & Coleman, 1989Go; Girardeau & Ibarguchi, 1991Go; Kausar, 1998Go; Smith et al., 1999Go; Parlak et al., 2002Go; Santos et al., 2002Go; Worden, 2002Go; Spandler et al., 2003Go).

 
In a plot of Cr2O3 content vs Mg-number of clinopyroxene (Fig. 14c), the more primitive, mantle-like character of the clinopyroxene in the orthopyroxenites is apparent, and is distinct from that of the websterite clinopyroxene, which has a closer affinity to arc crustal pyroxenites. The nominal mantle signature is also documented in the NiO contents of olivine in orthopyroxenites, whereas the olivine in the websterites and clinopyroxenites has both lower Mg-number and lower NiO content than those from mantle-derived peridotites (Fig. 6). Although comparison of Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites with literature data shows that the orthopyroxenites have a strong affinity with mantle pyroxenites, there are several features, especially the low Al2O3 contents, that are similar to arc-related crustal cumulates. In fact, the chemical characteristics of the Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites are best described by the intersection of the two established pyroxenite fields (Fig. 13a and b). The observation that the websterites, which clearly have a mantle origin, are compositionally similar to crustal pyroxenites indicates that the existing distinctions on chemical arguments are not robust. Some low-Al2O3 mantle pyroxenites described in the literature might have formed in a similar way to the rocks described here.

Metasomatic formation of SSZ mantle pyroxenites
Three main processes have been proposed for the formation of pyroxenites. They can form as cumulates in lower crustal magma chambers (DeBari & Coleman, 1989Go; Schiano et al., 2000Go), from recycled elongated slices of oceanic crust (Polvé & Allègre, 1980Go; Allègre & Turcotte, 1986Go) or from melt/fluid–peridotite interaction (Kelemen et al., 1992Go; Smith & Riter, 1997Go; Wilkinson & Stolz, 1997Go; Garrido & Bodinier, 1999Go; Smith et al., 1999Go; Zanetti et al., 1999Go; McInnes et al., 2001Go; Wang et al., 2001Go). The multi-generational network of veins crosscutting massive harzburgites (Fig. 3) and the replacement textures, wherein mantle orthopyroxene relics occur amongst an orthopyroxene–clinopyroxene assemblage (Fig. 4b), exclude an origin as arc cumulates. These features are consistent with origins via reactions between peridotite and a metasomatic agent (aqueous fluid and/or melt). On the basis of the very low REE contents and the presence of mantle relics, the recycling of crustal material alone is an unlikely process to explain the formation of the pyroxenites.

The relatively low temperatures of equilibration for the orthopyroxenites and websterites (950–1000°C), which are below the wet peridotite solidus, indicate that the metasomatizing agent was more probably an aqueous fluid rather than a hydrous silicate melt. This is supported by the widespread occurrence of primary fluid inclusions in the pyroxenites. The orthopyroxenite can be formed by SiO2-rich aqueous fluid metasomatism, transforming olivine to orthopyroxene (Kelemen et al., 1992Go; Morishita et al., 2003Go). The fluid must have contained considerable quantities of fluid-mobile elements such as LILE, Sr, and Pb, which caused the enrichment of these elements with respect to a normal harzburgite mantle. The lower Mg-number of the websterites indicates that the metasomatic agent responsible for producing the websterites contained substantial quantities of major elements, especially higher amounts of Ca and Fe. The clinopyroxenites are distinct from the orthopyroxenites and websterites in other respects, such as their higher temperature of formation. There is a possibility that the clinopyroxenites formed by interaction between harzburgite and hydrous silicate melt.

A metasomatic origin for pyroxenites with similar major element compositions has been proposed for the Group D-Ronda pyroxenites (Betic Cordillera, Southern Spain) by Garrido & Bodinier (1999)Go. Based on trace element compositions, those workers suggested that some pyroxenites were formed by metasomatic replacement of mafic layers via melt–rock reactions. The REEN patterns for the San Jorge and Santa Isabel pyroxenites (Fig. 12a) are similar to those of Ronda pyroxenites. Pyroxenites from both locations have depleted LREE relative to HREE and low contents of HREE, consistent with the metasomatic agent being a fluid rather a melt. In the primitive mantle-normalized multi-element pattern (Fig. 12b), additional similarities between pyroxenites from San Jorge, Santa Isabel and Ronda are clear. For example, positive Ti anomalies are characteristic of Ronda D2 orthopyroxenites and those from Santa Isabel and San Jorge, whereas negative Ti anomalies occur in Ronda D3 and Solomons websterites. Pyroxenites from both Ronda and the Solomons are characterized by positive Sr and Pb anomalies relative to neighbouring REE. Whereas we can clearly infer that the Solomon Islands pyroxenite formed in a supra-subduction zone mantle wedge, it has not been possible to reach this conclusion for the Ronda pyroxenite.

Tectonic model of pyroxenite formation and exhumation
Genesis of the pyroxenites
While the Pacific Plate subducted underneath the Solomon arc, dehydration of the descending slab presumably occurred continuously down-dip (Schmidt & Poli, 1998Go), and large quantities of oxidized hydrous fluids were expelled into the overlying mantle at different depths (Stern, 2002Go) (Fig. 15a). At deep levels, the slab-derived fluids were responsible for lowering the solidus temperature of the overlying mantle wedge, causing partial melting in the hotter portions of the wedge, generating the Solomon arc lavas.


Figure 15
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 15 Tectonic model for peridotite and pyroxenite formation and exhumation. (a) The Pacific oceanic lithosphere subducted beneath San Jorge–Santa Isabel (Solomon arc) in pre-Pliocene times. During that time, hydrous melts, released from the descending slab, interacted with the SSZ peridotites. The reaction between the peridotites and the metasomatizing agents forms the pyroxenites (P). (b) The Ontong–Java Plateau (OJP) collided with the Solomon arc (including San Jorge–Santa Isabel) in the Late Pliocene (Cowley et al., 2004Go). The compressional regime initiated the exhumation of metasomatized upper mantle along the slab via shear zones. During their exhumation, the pyroxenites were still exposed to fluids from the slab. As a result, hydration of clinopyroxene to amphibole occurred in the amphibolite facies. Continued interaction of aqueous fluids with the peridotites resulted in a late retrogression stage.

 
At shallower levels (~45 km depth), some slab-derived fluids from the subducted Pacific oceanic crust migrated via channelized pathways through the mantle wedge, locally changing its bulk composition and mineralogy. The interaction between fluid and peridotite resulted in vein and dyke formation of pyroxenite characterized by enrichments in fluid-mobile elements (Fig. 15a). The chemical characteristics of these pyroxenites share similarities with both upper mantle pyroxenites and arc-related, deep crustal cumulates.

Exhumation of the pyroxenites
The exhumation of the pyroxenites is documented in minor retrograde assemblages (Table 2). As the temperatures and pressures decreased during exhumation, some hydrous metasomatism of the pyroxenites led to local formation of amphibole. The hydration of clinopyroxene to magnesio-hornblende and tremolitic hornblende occurs in the upper amphibolite facies with pyroxene breakdown (~<825°C) and above the hornblende solvus (T > 600°C) (Kimball, 1985Go). Sulphide grains are texturally in equilibrium with the hornblende, and probably formed from the reaction between a hydrous fluid with high SO2/H2S and the pyroxenites. Such S-rich fluid arguably originates from the uppermost portion of the oceanic crust (McInnes et al., 2001Go). As the exhumation continued (Fig. 15b), the pyroxenites partially re-equilibrated with a late retrograde fluid under greenschist-facies conditions. Below 400°C, hornblende became unstable relative to tremolite (Kimball, 1985Go), and continued interaction of aqueous fluid with the pyroxenites (and associated peridotite) resulted in minor serpentinization of olivine, orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene (Mevel, 1988Go). The observed retrogression suggests that the pyroxenites were continually exposed to fluids released from the slab that underwent continuous dehydration process (Schmidt & Poli, 1998Go) (Fig. 15b).

The mechanism of this exhumation is tectonically driven, resulting from the increasing coupling between the OJP and Solomon arc (Petterson et al., 1997Go, 1999Go). Portions of the mantle wedge (including the pyroxenites) are therefore exhumed along the slab via shear zones (Fig. 15b). Also, it is possible that buoyant serpentinites played an important role in the exhumation of dense ultramafic rocks. On San Jorge, for example, fresh blocks of peridotite and pyroxenite are enclosed in a large serpentine massif.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
It is proposed that the petrology, mineralogy and geochemistry of the Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites indicate that they are related to subduction zone processes, and do not represent deep lithologies of the OJP. The pyroxenites are characterized by relatively low temperatures of formation (950–1000°C) consistent with a genesis resulting from interaction between an aqueous fluid and a harzburgitic upper mantle. This process produced a chemical signature in the mantle-derived pyroxenites that is similar, in some respects, to that of arc-related cumulates.

In an arc setting, deep fluids (>120 km) released from the subducted slab are responsible for the partial melting of peridotites in the mantle wedge, generating arc magmas. We suggest that the Santa Isabel and San Jorge pyroxenites represent the products of subduction-related aqueous fluid and melt interaction with the mantle wedge at shallower depths, corresponding to a deep crust–mantle level (~30–45 km). The prime pressure constraint is the absence of garnet.

A surprising feature of the Solomons pyroxenites, given the relatively low temperatures and pressures of formation and possible involvement of hydrous fluids/melts, is the general absence of primary hydrous phases, such as amphibole and mica; this is a feature shared with the Ronda (Group D) pyroxenites (Garrido & Bodinier, 1999Go). With respect to this feature, it is worth recalling the pyroxenites are clearly not equivalent in bulk chemistry to ordinary mantle melts (see Table 8), but rather represent replacement-reaction products of peridotite. The vein systems now occupied by pyroxenite probably preserve the channelized flowpaths but not the total flux of fluids and melts. Accordingly, the absence of primary hydrous phases may be the result of insufficient volatile content at any given period in the flux history. Nevertheless, the pyroxenites exposed on the islands of San Jorge and Santa Isabel provide an important opportunity to investigate the nature of fluids released at relatively shallow depths from the subducted slab.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors would like to thank the government and people of the Solomon Islands, who have allowed research work to be conducted within their land and sea boundaries. We are indebted to the field staff of the Geological Survey of the Solomon Islands (Honiara) for their invaluable field support; in particular, we thank Cromwell Qopoto, Stanley Basi, Andrew Mason and Watson Satokana. The assistance of John Vickers, Tony Phimphisane and John Seeley in sample preparation is gratefully appreciated. We also wish to thank François Bussy (Université de Lausanne), Frank Brink (RSBS, ANU) and Nick Ware (RSES, ANU) for their guidance in various analytical techniques. Olivier Bruguier (Université de Montpellier II) and Francine Keller (Université J. Fourier) are thanked for their assistance with ICP-MS work, and Steve Eggins, Charlotte Allens and Mike Shelley (RSES, ANU) were the experts supporting the LA-ICP-MS studies. This paper benefited greatly from discussions with I. J. Parkinson (Open University), O. Müntener (Université de Neuchatel), J. L. Bodinier (Université de Montpellier II), and D. H. Green (RSES, ANU). Research costs at the ANU were partially defrayed by an ARC grant to R.J.A. and an ANU grant, and some financial support was provided by the Ministère des Affaires Etrangères (France), the Région Rhône-Alpes (France), and the Embassy of France in Australia.


    FOOTNOTES
 
{dagger} Deceased. Back


*Corresponding author. E-mail: Richard.Arculus{at}anu.edu.au


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GEOLOGICAL SETTING
 THE GEOLOGY OF SANTA...
 PERIDOTITE-PYROXENITE FIELD...
 ANALYTICAL METHODS
 PETROGRAPHY
 MINERAL COMPOSITIONS
 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF...
 BULK-ROCK COMPOSITIONS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Allègre C. J. and Turcotte D. L. (1986) Implications of a two-component marble cake mantle. Nature 323:123–127.[CrossRef]

Ayers J. C., Dittmer S. K., Layne G. D. (1997) Partitioning of elements between peridotite and H2O at 2·0–3·0 GPa and 900–1100°C, and application to models of subduction zone processes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 150:381–398.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Barrat J. A., Keller F., Amossé J., Taylor R. N., Nesbitt R. W., Hirata T. (1996) Determination of rare earth elements in sixteen silicate reference samples by ICP-MS using a Tm addition and an ion-exchange chromatography procedure. Geostandards Newsletter XX:133–139.

Bodinier J. L., Guiraud M., Fabriès J., Dostal J., Dupuy C. (1987) Petrogenesis of layered pyroxenites from the Lherz, Freychinède and Prades ultramafic bodies (Ariège, French Pyrénées). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 51:279–290.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Bodinier J. L., Dupuy C., Dostal J. (1988) Geochemistry and petrogenesis of Eastern Pyrenean peridotites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52:2893–2907.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Bonatti E. and Michael P. J. (1989) Mantle peridotites from continental rifts to ocean basins to subduction zones. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 91:297–311.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Brenan J. M., Shaw H. F., Ryerson F. J., Phinney D. L. (1995) Mineral–aqueous fluid partitioning of trace elements at 900°C and 2·0 GPa: constraints on the trace element chemistry of mantle and deep crustal fluids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 59:3331–3350.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Coffin M. and Eldholm O. (1994) Large igneous provinces: crustal structure, dimensions and external consequences. Reviews of Geophysics 32:1–36.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Coleman P. J. (1965) Stratigraphical and structural notes on the British Solomon Islands with reference to the first geological map, 1962. Report No. 29. British Solomon Islands Geological Record 2:17–33.

Cowley S. P., Mann P., Coffin M. F., Shipley T. (2004) Oligocene to recent tectonic history of the Central Solomon intra-arc basin as determined from marine seismic reflection data and compilation of onland geology. Tectonophysics 389:267–307.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

DeBari S. M. and Coleman R. J. (1989) Examination of the deep levels of an island arc: evidence from the Tonsina ultramafic–mafic assemblage. Journal of Geophysical Research 94:4373–4391.

DeBari S. M., Kay S. M., Kay R. W. (1987) Ultramafic xenoliths from Adagdak volcano, Adak, Aleutian Islands, Alaska: deformed igneous cumulates from the Moho of an island arc. Journal of Geology 95:329–341.[Web of Science]

Dick H. J. B. and Bullen T. (1984) Chromian spinel as a petrogenetic indicator in abyssal and alpine-type peridotites and spatially associated lavas. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 86:54–76.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Eggins S. M., Woodhead J. D., Kinsley L. P. J., Mortimer G. E., Sylvester P., McCulloch M. T., Hergt J. M., Handler M. R. (1997) A simple method for the precise determination of >40 trace elements in geological samples by ICPMS using enriched isotope internal standardisation. Chemical Geology 134:311–326.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ely J. C. and Neal C. R. (2003) Using platinum-group elements to investigate the origin of the Ontong Java Plateau, SW Pacific. Chemical Geology 196:235–257.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Fabriès J., Lorand J. P., Bodinier J. L., Dupuy C. (1991) Evolution of the upper mantle beneath the Pyrenees: evidence from orogenic spinel lherzolite massifs. Journal of Petrology (Special Lherzolites Issue) 55–77.

Findlay D. C. (1969) Origin of the Tulameen ultramafic–gabbro complex: southern British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 6:399–425.

Fliedner M. M. and Klemperer S. L. (1999) Structure of an island-arc: wide-angle seismic studies in the eastern Aleutian Islands, Alaska. Journal of Geophysical Research 104:10667–10694.[CrossRef]

Frey F. A. (1978) Ultramafic inclusions from San Carlos, Arizona: petrologic and geochemical data bearing on their petrogenesis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 38:129–176.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Frey F. A. and Prinz M. (1978) Ultramafic inclusions from San Carlos, Arizona: petrologic and geochemical data bearing on their petrogenesis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 38:129–176.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Fryer B. J., Ambos E. L., Hussong D. M. (1985) Origin and emplacement of Mariana forearc seamounts. Geology 13:774–777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Garrido C. J. and Bodinier J. L. (1999) Diversity of mafic rocks in the Ronda peridotite: evidence for pervasive melt–rock reaction during heating of subcontinental lithosphere by upwelling asthenosphere. Journal of Petrology 40:729–754.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Girardeau J. and Ibarguchi J. I. G. (1991) Pyroxenite-rich peridotites of the Cabo Ortegal Complex (northwestern Spain): evidence for large-scale upper-mantle heterogeneity. Journal of Petrology (Special Lherzolites Issue) 135–153.

Griffin W. L., O'Reilly S. Y., Stabel A. (1988) Mantle metasomatism beneath Western Victoria, Australia. II. Isotopic geochemistry of Cr-diopside lherzolites and Al-augite pyroxenites. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 52:449–459.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Hamelin B. and Allègre C. J. (1988) Evidence for the ‘marble-cake’ structure of the mantle: a lead isotope study of orogenic lherzolite massifs. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 91:117–131.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Hawkins M. P. and Barron J. M. (1991) The Geology and Mineral Resources of Santa Isabel (Report), Ministry of Natural resources, Honiara, 114pp.

Hirschmann M. M. and Stolper E. M. (1996) A possible role for garnet pyroxenite in the origin of the ‘garnet signature’ in MORB. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 124:185–208.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ho K.-S., Chen J.-C., Smith A. D., Juang W.-S. (2000) Petrogenesis of two groups of pyroxenite from Tungchihsu, Penghu Islands, Taiwan Strait: implications for mantle metasomatism beneath SE China. Chemical Geology 167:355–372.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Ionov D. A., Savoyant L., Dupuy C. (1992) Application of the ICP-MS technique to trace-element analysis of peridotites and their minerals. Geostandards Newsletters 16:311–315.

Irving A. J. (1974) Geochemical and high pressure experimental studies of garnet pyroxenite and pyroxene granulites xenoliths from the Delegate Basaltic Pipes, Australia. Journal of Petrology 15:1–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Irving A. J. (1980) Petrology and geochemistry of composite ultramafic xenoliths in alkalic basalts and implications for magmatic processes within the mantle. American Journal of Science 280-A:389–426.[Web of Science]

James O. B. (1971) Origin and emplacement of the ultramafic rocks of the Emigrant Gap area, California. Journal of Petrology 12:523–560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jan Q. and Howie R. A. (1981) Metamorphosed basic and ultrabasic rocks of the Jijal complex, Kohistan, NW Pakistan. Journal of Petrology 22:85–126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kausar A. B. (1998) L'arc sud Kohistan, N. Pakistan: évolution pétrologique et distribution des éléments et minéraux du groupe du platine. Thèse des Sciences de la Terre, Université J. Fourier, St. Martin d'Heres.

Kelemen P. B., Dick H. J. B., Quick J. E. (1992) Formation of harzburgite by pervasive melt/rock reaction in the upper mantle. Nature 358:635–641.[CrossRef]

Keppler H. (1996) Constraints from partitioning experiments on the composition of subduction zone fluids. Nature 380:237–240.[CrossRef]

Kerr A. C., Saunders A. D., Tarney A. D., Berry N. H., Hards V. L. (1995) Depleted mantle-plume geochemical signatures: no paradox for plume theories. Geology 23:843–846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kimball K. L. (1985) High temperature alteration of abyssal ultramafics from the Islas Orcadas fracture zone, South Atlantic. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 91:307–320.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Kornprobst J. (1969) Le massif ultrabasique des Beni Bouchera (Rift Interne, Maroc): étude des péridotites de haute température et de haute pression, et des pyroxénolites, à grenat ou sans grenat, qui leur sont associées. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 23:283–322.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Kornprobst J., Piboule M., Roden M., Tabit A. (1990) Corundum-bearing garnet clinopyroxenites at Beni Bousera (Morroco): original plagioclase-rich gabbros recrystallized at depth within mantle. Journal of Petrology 31:17–45.[Medline]

Kumar N., Reisberg L., Zindler A. (1996) A major and trace element and strontium, neodynium, and osmium isotopic study of a thick pyroxenite layer from the Beni Bousera Ultramafic Complex of northern Morocco. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 60:1429–1444.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Leake B. E. (1978) Nomenclature of amphiboles; report of the subcommittee on amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. European Journal of Mineralogy 9:623–651.

Mann P. and Taira A. (2004) Global tectonic significance of the Solomon Islands and the Ontong Java Plateau convergent zone. Tectonophysics 389:137–190.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Mann P., Gahagan L., Coffin M. F., Shipley T., Cowley S., Phinney E. (1996) Regional tectonic effects resulting from the progressive east-to-west collision of the Ontong Java Plateau with the Melanesian Arc System (abstract). EOS Transactions, American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 77:712.

McCulloch M. T. and Gamble J. A. (1991) Geochemical and geodynamical constraints on subduction zone magmatism. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 102:358–374.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

McInnes B. I. A., Gregoire M., Binns R. A., Herzig P. M., Hannington M. D. (2001) Hydrous metasomatism of the oceanic sub-arc mantle, Lihir, Papua New Guinea; petrology and geochemistry of fluid-metasomatised mantle wedge xenoliths. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 188:169–183.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Mevel C. (1988) Metamorphism in oceanic layer 3, Gorringe Bank, Eastern Atlantic. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 100:496–509.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Moore A. C. (1970) Descriptive terminology for the textures of rocks in granulite facies terrains. Lithos 3:123–127.[CrossRef]

Morishita T., Arai S., Green D. H. (2003) Evolution of low-Al orthopyroxene in the Horoman Peridotite, Japan: an unusual indicator of metasomatizing fluids. Journal of Petrology 44:1237–1246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Müntener O., Kelemen P., Grove T. L. (2001) The role of H2O during crystallisation of primitive arc magmas under uppermost mantle conditions and genesis of igneous pyroxenites: an experimental study. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 141:643–658.[Web of Science]

Neal C. R., Mahoney J. J., Kroenke L. W., Duncan R. A., Petterson M. G. (1997) The Ontong Java Plateau. In: Large Igneous Provinces: Continental, Oceanic, and Planetary Flood Volcanism (J.J. Mahoney & M. Coffin, eds), Geophysical Monograph. 100:183–216 American Geophysical Union.

Norrish K. and Hutton J. T. (1969) An accurate X-ray spectrographic method for the analysis of a wide range of geological samples. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 33:431–454.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Parkinson I. J. and Pearce J. A. (1998) Peridotites from the Izu–Bonin–Mariana forearc (ODP leg 125): evidence for mantle melting and melt–mantle interaction in the supra-subduction zone setting. Journal of Petrology 39:1577–1618.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Parlak O., Hock V., Delaloye M. (2002) The supra-subduction zone Pozanti–Karsanti ophiolite, southern Turkey: evidence for high-pressure crystal fractionation of ultramafic cumulates. Lithos 65:205–224.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Passchier C. W. and Trouw R. A. J. (1996) Microtectonics (Springer, Berlin).

Pearson D. G., Davies G. R., Nixon P. H. (1993) Geochemical constraints on the petrogenesis of diamond facies pyroxenites from the Beni Bousera peridotite massif. Journal of Petrology 34:125–172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Petterson M. G., Neal. C. R., Mahoney J. J., Kroenke L. W., Saunders A. D., Babbs T. L., Duncan R. A., Tolia D., McGrail B. (1997) Structure and deformation of north and central Malaita, Solomon Islands: tectonic implications for the Ontong Java Plateau–Solomon arc collision, and for the fate of oceanic plateaus. Tectonophysics 283:1–33.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Petterson M. G., Babbs T., Neal C. R., Mahoney J. J., Saunders A. D., Duncan R. A., Tolia D., Magu R., Qopoto C., Mahoa H., Natogga D. (1999) Geological–tectonic framework of Solomon Islands, SW Pacific: crustal accretion and growth within an intra-oceanic setting. Tectonophysics 301:35–60.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Piccardo G. B., Messiga B., Vannucci R. (1988) The Zabargad peridotite–pyroxenite association: petrological constraints on its evolution. Tectonophysics 150:135–162.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Polvé M. and Allègre C. J. (1980) Orogenic lherzolite complexes studied by 87Sr/86Sr: a clue to understanding mantle convection processes. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 51:71–93.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Quick J. E. (1981) Petrology and petrogenesis of the Trinity Peridotite, an upper mantle diapir in the Eastern Klamath Mountains, Northern California. Journal of Geophysical Research 86:11837–11863.[CrossRef]

Rivalenti G., Mazzucchelli M., Vanucci R., Hofmann A. W., Ottolini L., Bottazzi P., Obermiller W. (1995) The relationship between websterite and peridotite in the Balmuccia peridotite massif (NW Italy) as revealed by trace element variations in clinopyroxene. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 121:275–288.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Rohrbach A., Schuth S., Ballhaus C., Münker C., Matveev S., Qopoto C. (2005) Petrological constraints on the origin of arc picrites, New Georgia Group, Solomon Islands. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 149:685–698.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Santos J. F., Scharer U., Ibarguchi J. I. G., Girardeau J. (2002) Genesis of pyroxenite-rich peridotite at Cabo Ortegal (NW Spain): geochemical and Pb–Sr–Nd isotope data. Journal of Petrology 43:17–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schiano P., Eiler J. M., Hutcheon I. D., Stolper E. M. (2000) Primitive CaO-rich, silica-undersaturated melts in islands arcs: evidence for the involvement of clinopyroxene-rich lithologies in the petrogenesis of arc magmas. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 1: doi:10.1029/1999GC000032.

Schmidt M. W. and Poli S. (1998) Experimentally based water budgets for dehydrating slabs and consequences for arc magma generation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 163:361–379.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Seyler M. and Mattson P. H. (1989) Petrology and thermal evolution of the Tinaquillo peridotite (Venezuela). Journal of Geophysical Research 94:7629–7660.

Seyler M. and Mattson P. H. (1993) Gabbroic and pyroxenite layers in the Tinaquillo, Venezuela, peridotite: succession of melt intrusions in a rising mantle diapir. Journal of Geology 101:501–511.[Web of Science]

Shervais J. W. (1990) Island arc ocean crust ophiolites: contrasts in the petrology, geochemistry and tectonic style of ophiolite assemblages in the California Coast Ranges. In Malpas J., Moores E. M., Panayiotou A., Xenophontos C. (Eds.). Ophiolites: Oceanic Crustal Analogues. Proceedings of the Symposium ‘Troodos 1987’. (Geological Survey Department, Nicosia) pp. 507–520.

Sinigoi S., Comin-Chiaramonti P., Alberti A. A. (1980) Phase relations in the partial melting of the Badissero spinel-lherzolite (Ivrea–Verbano Zone, Western Alps, Italy). Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 75:111–121.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Smith D. and Riter J. C. A. (1997) Genesis and evolution of low-Al orthopyroxene in spinel peridotite xenoliths, Grand Canyon field, Arizona, USA. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 127:391–404.[CrossRef]

Smith D., Riter J. C. A., Mertzman S. A. (1999) Water–rock interactions, orthopyroxene growth, and Si-enrichment in the mantle: evidence in the xenoliths from the Colorado Plateau, southwestern United States. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 165:45–54.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Snoke A. W., Quick J. E., Bowman H. R. (1981) Bear Mountain igneous complex, Klamath Mountains, California: an ultrabasic to silicic calc-alkaline suite. Journal of Petrology 22:501–552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Spandler C. J., Arculus R. J., Eggins S. M., Mavrogenes J. A., Price R. C., Reay A. (2003) Petrogenesis of the Greenhills Complex, Southland, New Zealand: magmatic differentiation and cumulate formation at the roots of a Permian island-arc volcano. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 144:703–721.[Web of Science]

Stanton R. L. (1961) Explanatory notes to accompany a first geological map of Santa Isabel. Overseas Geology and Mineral Resources 8:127–149.

Stern R. J. (2002) Subduction zones. Reviews of Geophysics 40:3.1–3.38.

Sun S. and McDonough W. F. (1989) Chemical and isotopic systematics of the oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes. In Saunders A. D. and Norry M. J. (Eds.). Magmatism in the Ocean Basins. Geological Society (Special Publications, London) 42: pp. 313–345.

Suyehiro K., Takahashi N., Ariie Y., Yokoi Y., Hino R., Shinohara M., Kanazawa T., Hirata N., Tokuyama H., Taira A. (1996) Continental crust, crustal underplating and low-Q upper mantle beneath an oceanic island arc. Science 272:390–392.[Abstract]

Tatsumi Y., Hamilton D. L., Nesbitt R. W. (1986) Chemical characteristics of fluid phase released from a subducted lithosphere and origin of arc magmas: evidence from high pressure experiments and natural rocks. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 29:293–309.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Tejada M. L. G., Mahoney J. J., Duncan R. A., Hawkins M. P. (1996) Age and geochemistry of basement and alkalic rocks of Malaita and Santa Isabel, Solomon Islands, southern margin of Ontong Java Plateau. Journal of Petrology 37:361–394.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Den Kerkhof A. M. and Hein U. F. (2001) Fluid inclusion petrography. Lithos 55:27–47.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Vaselli O., Downes H., Thirlwall M., Dobosi C., Coradossi N., Seghedi I., Szakacz A., Vannucci R. (1995) Ultramafic xenoliths in Plio-Pleistocene alkali basalts from the Eastern Transylvanian Basin: depleted mantle enriched by vein metasomatism. Journal of Petrology 36:23–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang Z., Sun S., Hou Q., Li J. (2001) Effect of melt–rock interaction on geochemistry in the Kudi ophiolite (western Kunlun Mountains, northwestern China): implication for ophiolite origin. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 191:33–48.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Wells P. R. A. (1977) Pyroxene thermometry in simple and complex systems. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 62:129–139.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Wilkinson J. F. G. and Stolz A. J. (1997) Subcalcic clinopyroxenites and associated ultramafic xenoliths in alkali basalt near Glenn Innes, northeastern New South Wales, Australia. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 127:272–290.[CrossRef][Web of Science]

Worden K. (2002) Petrology of the Takitimu Mountains, Southland New Zealand. 80 Honours thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.

Zanetti A., Mazzucchelli M., Rivalenti G., Vannucci R. (1999) The Finero phlogopite-peridotite massif: an example of subduction-related metasomatism. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 134:107–122.[CrossRef][Web of Science]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
I. Baziotis, E. Mposkos, and P. D. Asimow
Petrogenesis of Ultramafic Rocks from the Ultrahigh-pressure Metamorphic Kimi Complex in Eastern Rhodope (NE Greece)
J. Petrology, May 1, 2008; 49(5): 885 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
47/8/1531    most recent
egl019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BERLY, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by LAPIERRE, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?