Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.-J.
Right arrow Articles by Wyllie, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 39 | Number 3 | Pages 495-517 | 1998
© Oxford University Press 1998

Petrogenesis of Carbonatite Magmas from Mantle to Crust, Constrained by the System CaO–(MgO + FeO*)–(Na2O + K2O)–(SiO2 + Al2O3 + TiO2)-CO2

Woh-Jer Lee* and Peter J. Wyllie

Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology Pasadena,CA 91125, USA

Received April 15, 1997; Revised typescript accepted October 21, 1997


   Abstract

Experimental results from the systems CaO–MgO–SiO2–CO2, Na2O–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–CO2, and a primitive magnesian nephelinite mixed with carbonates have been combined for construction of phase diagrams for the pseudoquaternary system CaO–(MgO + FeO*)–(Na2O + K2O)–(SiO2 + Al2O3 + TiO2) with CO2 at 1.0 and 2.5 GPa pressure. These diagrams provide a petrogenetic framework for magmatic processes from mantle to deep crust, with particular reference to the melting products of carbonate peridotite and the paths of crystallization of carbonated silicate magmas toward carbonatite magmas, with or without the intervention of silicate–carbonate liquid immiscibility. Three key features control these processes: (1) the liquidus surface bounding the silicate–carbonate liquid miscibility gap, (2) the silicate–carbonate liquidus boundary surface which separates the liquidus volume for primary silicates from that for primary carbonates, and (3) the curve of intersection of these two surfaces (1 and 2) which defines the coprecipitation of silicates and calcite with coexisting immiscible silicate- and carbonate-rich liquids. The geometrical arrangement of the two surfaces varies as a function of both pressure and bulk composition (e.g. with Si/Al, Na/K, Mg/Fe). Surface (2) is the locus of initial liquids from partial melting of carbonate–silicate assemblages, and the limit for residual liquid compositions derived from silicate–CO2 liquids. The carbonate liquidus volume is a forbidden region for carbonate-rich magmas derived from silicate magmas at the pressures investigated. The immiscible liquids dissolve no more than 80 wt % CaCO3, and the miscibility gap (MG) becomes smaller with increasing Mg/Ca. Extrapolation of experimental data indicates that the MG disappears with more than ~50 wt % (MgO + FeO*) at 1.0 GPa for the compositions investigated. The distance between the miscibility gap, surface (1), and the silicate–carbonate liquidus surface, surface (2), increases significantly with increasing (MgO + FeO*). This observation, coupled with knowledge of the phase boundaries in the system, allows comparisons with projected rock compositions, and this permits the following conclusions. Calciocarbonatites and natrocarbonatites are excluded as candidates for primary magmas from the mantle, which must have compositions dominated by calcic dolomite. The formation of (equilibrium) carbonate-rich liquids immiscible with silicate magmas in the mantle is unlikely, which denies the formation of CaCO3 ocelli in mantle xenoliths as immiscible liquids. Immiscible carbonate-rich magmas separated from many silicate magmas may tend to be concentrated near calciocarbonatite compositions, with maximum CaCO3 75–80 wt %, low (MgO + FeO*), and (Na,K)2CO3 near 15 wt %. Silicate parents with higher Na/Ca and peralkalinity may yield immiscible magmas approaching natrocarbonatite compositions. Exsolution of immiscible carbonate-rich magma occurs without the coprecipitation of calcite except along the limiting field boundary (3). Only after the carbonate-rich magma is physically separated from the parent magma, and cooled with the precipitation of silicates, does it reach the silicate–carbonate field boundary and precipitate cumulate carbonatites, with inevitable enrichment of residual liquids in alkalis. Calciocarbonatite magmas cannot be derived from natrocarbonatite magmas. Dolomitic carbonatite magmas cannot be formed by liquid immiscibility, but only by fractionation of calciocarbonatites (according to CaCO3–MgCO3), or as primary magmas.

KEY WORDS: CaCO3 ocelli; carbonatite; liquid immiscibility; nephelinite


* Corresponding author. Telephone: + 1 (818)-395-6239. Fax: + 1 (818)-568-0935. e-mail: wjl{at}gps.caltech.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. S. Ray
Radiogenic Isotopic Ratio Variations in Carbonatites and Associated Alkaline Silicate Rocks: Role of Crustal Assimilation
J. Petrology, October 1, 2009; 50(10): 1955 - 1971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
B. G. J. Upton, R. W. Hinton, P. Aspen, A. Finch, and J. W. Valley
Megacrysts and Associated Xenoliths: Evidence for Migration of Geochemically Enriched Melts in the Upper Mantle beneath Scotland
J. Petrology, June 1, 1999; 40(6): 935 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
P. J. Wyllie and W.-J. Lee
Model System Controls on Conditions for Formation of Magnesiocarbonatite and Calciocarbonatite Magmas from the Mantle
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 1885 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
D. Ionov
Trace Element Composition of Mantle-derived Carbonates and Coexisting Phasesin Peridotite Xenoliths from Alkali Basalts
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 1931 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
W. G. Minarik
Complications to Carbonate Melt Mobility due to the Presence of an Immiscible Silicate Melt
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 1965 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
W.-J. Lee and P. J. Wyllie
Processes of Crustal Carbonatite Formation by Liquid Immiscibility and Differentiation, Elucidated by Model Systems
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 2005 - 2013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
I. V. Veksler, T. F. D. Nielsen, and S. V. Sokolov
Mineralogy of Crystallized Melt Inclusions from Gardiner and Kovdor Ultramafic Alkaline Complexes: Implications for Carbonatite Genesis
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 2015 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
A. F. Cooper and D. L. Reid
Nepheline Sovites as Parental Magmas in Carbonatite Complexes: Evidence from Dicker Willem, Southwest Namibia
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 2123 - 2136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
C. M. Petibon, B. A. Kjarsgaard, G. A. Jenner, and S. E. Jackson
Phase Relationships of a Silicate-bearing Natrocarbonatite from Oldoinyo Lengai at 20 and 100 MPa
J. Petrology, November 1, 1998; 39(11-12): 2137 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.