Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOK, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by BOWMAN, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology Volume 41 Number 6 Pages 739-757 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Mineralogical Evidence for Fluid–Rock Interaction Accompanying Prograde Contact Metamorphism of Siliceous Dolomites: Alta Stock Aureole, Utah, USA

STEPHEN J. COOK,* and JOHN R. BOWMAN,{dagger}

DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS, THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH, SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84112, USA

Contact metamorphism of siliceous dolomite in the southern part of the metamorphic aureole of the Alta stock (Utah, USA) produced the prograde isograd sequence: talc (Tc), tremolite (Tr), forsterite (Fo), and periclase (Per). Calcite (Cc)–dolomite (Do) geothermometry and phase equilibria define a general prograde T–X(CO2) path of decreasing X(CO2) with rising temperature for the dolomite. High-variance assemblages typify the aureole. Per + Cc and Fo + Cc + Do characterize the inner aureole (Per and Fo zones), and Tr + Do + Cc and Tc + Do + Cc are widespread in the outer aureole (Tr and Tc zones). Low-variance assemblages are rare and the thickness of reaction zones (coexisting reactant and product minerals) at the isogradic reaction fronts are narrow (tens of metres or less). The mineral assemblages, calculated progress of isograd reactions, and the prograde T–X(CO2) path all indicate that massive dolomite was infiltrated by significant fluxes of water-rich fluids during prograde metamorphism, and that the fluid flow was down-temperature and laterally away from the igneous contact. Fluid infiltration continued through at least the initial retrograde cooling of the periclase zone. Down-T fluid flow is also consistent with the results of Cc–Do geothermometry and patterns of 18O depletion in this area. The close spatial association of reacted and unreacted chert nodules in both the tremolite and talc zones plus the formation of tremolite by two reactions indicate that the outer aureole varied in X(CO2), and imply that fluid flow in the outer aureole was heterogeneous. The occurrence of dolomite-rich and periclase (brucite)-absent, high-{delta}18O marble layers within the periclase zone indicates that fluid flow in the innermost aureole was also heterogeneous. Estimates of the average time-integrated fluid flux (qmTIFF) experienced by the periclase, forsterite, and tremolite zones are 4·2 x 107, 6·65 x 105, and 2·0 x 105 mol fluid/m2, respectively. The average value of qmTIFF for the periclase zone agrees well with the qmTIFF (3·4 x 107mol/m2) determined by numerical simulation of the temperature and 18O depletion profiles preserved in the southern aureole. The estimates of qmTIFF for the forsterite and tremolite zones have much greater uncertainty, but may indicate that fluid flux was considerably lower in these zones than in the periclase zone. Given the outward (down-temperature), subhorizontal flow geometry indicated by a variety of petrologic, geochemical, and geothermometry evidence presented here and elsewhere, this decrease implies that fluid has leaked from the flow system between the periclase and tremolite zones.

KEY WORDS: Alta; fluid flow; infiltration; marble; mineralogical


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ajsHome page
P. I. Nabelek
Numerical simulation of kinetically-controlled calc-silicate reactions and fluid flow with transient permeability around crystallizing plutons
Am J Sci, September 1, 2009; 309(7): 517 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. C. Penniston-Dorland and J. M. Ferry
Coupled dichotomies of apatite and fluid composition during contact metamorphism of siliceous carbonate rocks
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2005; 90(10): 1606 - 1618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
T. A. Ehlers
Crustal Thermal Processes and the Interpretation of Thermochronometer Data
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2005; 58(1): 315 - 350.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. M. FERRY, B. A. WING, and D. RUMBLE III
Formation of Wollastonite by Chemically Reactive Fluid Flow During Contact Metamorphism, Mt. Morrison Pendant, Sierra Nevada, California, USA
J. Petrology, September 1, 2001; 42(9): 1705 - 1728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
D. T. Woodford, V. B. Sisson, and W. P. Leeman
Boron metasomatism of the Alta stock contact aureole, Utah: Evidence from borates, mineral chemistry, and geochemistry
American Mineralogist, April 1, 2001; 86(4): 513 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
L. P. Baumgartner, L. P. Baumgartner, and J. W. Valley
Stable Isotope Transport and Contact Metamorphic Fluid Flow
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2001; 43(1): 415 - 467.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.