Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZEH, A.
Right arrow Articles by HORSTWOOD, M. S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Petrology | Volume 45 | Number 5 | Pages 949-973 | 2004
Journal of Petrology 45(5) © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Polymetamorphism in the NE Shackleton Range, Antarctica: Constraints from Petrology and U–Pb, Sm–Nd, Rb–Sr TIMS and in situ U–Pb LA-PIMMS Dating

A. ZEH1,*, I. L. MILLAR2 and M. S. A. HORSTWOOD3

1 MINERALOGISCHES INSTITUT, AM HUBLAND, D-97074 WÜRZBURG, GERMANY
2 BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY, c/o NERC ISOTOPE GEOSCIENCES LABORATORY, NICKER HILL, KEYWORTH, NOTTINGHAM NG12 5GG, UK
3 NERC ISOTOPE GEOSCIENCES LABORATORY, NICKER HILL, KEYWORTH, NOTTINGHAM NG12 5GG, UK

* Corresponding author. Telephone: +49-931-888-5414. E-mail: armin.zeh{at}mail.uni-wuerzburg.de

Metapelitic rock samples from the NE Shackleton Range, Antarctica, include garnet with contrasting zonation patterns and two age spectra. Garnet porphyroblasts in K-rich kyanite–sillimanite– staurolite–garnet–muscovite–biotite schists from Lord Nunatak show prograde growth zonation, and give Sm–Nd garnet, U–Pb monazite and Rb–Sr muscovite ages of 518 ± 5, 514 ± 1 and 499 ± 12 Ma, respectively. Geothermobarometry and PT pseudo-section calculations in the model system CaO–Na2O–K2O– TiO2–MnO–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O are consistent with garnet growth during prograde heating from 540°C/7 kbar to 650°C/7·5 kbar, and partial resorption during a subsequent PT decrease to <650°C at <6 kbar. All data indicate that rocks from Lord Nunatak were affected by a single orogenic cycle. In contrast, garnet porphyroblasts in K-poor kyanite–sillimanite– staurolite–garnet–cordierite–biotite-schists from Meade Nunatak show two growth stages and diffusion-controlled zonation. Two distinct age groups were obtained. Laser ablation plasma ionization multicollector mass spectrometry in situ analyses of monazite, completely enclosed by a first garnet generation, yield ages of c. 1700 Ma, whereas monazite grains in open garnet fractures and in most matrix domains give c. 500 Ma. Both age groups are also obtained by U–Pb thermal ionization mass spectrometry analyses of matrix monazite and zircon, which fall on a discordia with lower and upper intercepts at 502 ± 1 and 1686 ± 2 Ma, respectively. Sm–Nd garnet dating yields an age of 1571 ± 40 Ma and Rb–Sr biotite analyses give an age of 504 ± 1 Ma. Integrated geochronological and petrological data provide evidence that rocks from Meade Nunatak underwent a polymetamorphic Barrovian-type metamorphism: (1) garnet 1 growth and subsequent diffusive garnet annealing between 1700 and 1570 Ma; (2) garnet 2 growth during the Ross Orogeny at c. 500 Ma. During the final orogenic event the rocks experienced peak PT conditions of about 650°C/7·0 kbar and a retrograde stage at c. 575°C/4·0 kbar.

KEY WORDS: garnet microtexture; PT pseudosection; geochronology; polymetamorphism; Shackleton Range; Antarctica


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
J. L. Payne, M. Hand, K. M. Barovich, A. Reid, and D. A. D. Evans
Correlations and reconstruction models for the 2500-1500 Ma evolution of the Mawson Continent
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2009; 323(1): 319 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.