Skip Navigation


Journal of Petrology Advance Access originally published online on December 10, 2004
Journal of Petrology 2005 46(4):671-699; doi:10.1093/petrology/egh093
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
46/4/671    most recent
egh093v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOARD, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by ARMSTRONG, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2004. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Pan-African Tectonism in the Western Maud Belt: PTt Path for High-grade Gneisses in the H.U. Sverdrupfjella, East Antarctica

W. S. BOARD1, H. E. FRIMMEL1,* and R. A. ARMSTRONG2

1 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN, RONDEBOSCH 7701, SOUTH AFRICA
2 RESEARCH SCHOOL OF EARTH SCIENCES, AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY, CANBERRA, A.C.T. 002, AUSTRALIA

Extensive high-grade polydeformed metamorphic provinces surrounding Archaean cratonic nuclei in the East Antarctic Shield record two tectono-thermal episodes in late Mesoproterozoic and late Neoproterozoic–Cambrian times. In Western Dronning Maud Land, the high-grade Mesoproterozoic Maud Belt is juxtaposed against the Archaean Grunehogna Province and has traditionally been interpreted as a Grenvillian mobile belt that was thermally overprinted during the Early Palaeozoic. Integration of new U–Pb sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe and conventional single zircon and monazite age data, and Ar–Ar data on hornblende and biotite, with thermobarometric calculations on rocks from the H.U. Sverdrupfjella, northern Maud Belt, resulted in a more complex PTt evolution than previously assumed. A c. 540 Ma monazite, hosted by an upper ampibolite-facies mineral assemblage defining a regionally dominant top-to-NW shear fabric, provides strong evidence for the penetrative deformation in the area being of Pan-African age and not of Grenvillian age as previously reported. Relics of an eclogite-facies garnet–omphacite assemblage within strain-protected mafic boudins indicate that the peak metamorphic conditions recorded by most rocks in the area (T = 687–758°C, P = 9·4–11·3 kbar) were attained subsequent to decompression from P > 12·9 kbar. By analogy with limited U–Pb single zircon age data and on circumstantial textural grounds, this earlier eclogite-facies metamorphism is ascribed to subduction and accretion around 565 Ma. Post-peak metamorphic K-metasomatism under amphibolite-facies conditions is ascribed to the intrusion of post-orogenic granite at c. 480 Ma. The recognition of extensive Pan-African tectonism in the Maud Belt casts doubts on previous Rodinia reconstructions, in which this belt takes a pivotal position between East Antarctica, the Kalahari Craton and Laurentia. Evidence of late Mesoproterozoic high-grade metamorphism during the formation of the Maud Belt exists in the form of c. 1035 Ma zircon overgrowths that are probably related to relics of granulite-facies metamorphism recorded from other parts of the Maud Belt. The polymetamorphic rocks are largely derived from a c. 1140 Ma volcanic arc and 1072 ± 10 Ma granite.

KEY WORDS: Maud Belt; Pan-African orogeny; geochronology; PTt path, East Antarctica


* Corresponding author. Present address: Institute of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany. Telephone: +49-931-888-5420. Fax: +49-931-888-4620. E-mail: Hartwig.Frimmel{at}mail.uni-wuerzburg.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
G. H. Grantham, P. H. Macey, B. A. Ingram, M. P. Roberts, R. A. Armstrong, T. Hokada, K. Shiraishi, C. Jackson, A. Bisnath, and V. Manhica
Terrane correlation between Antarctica, Mozambique and Sri Lanka; comparisons of geochronology, lithology, structure and metamorphism and possible implications for the geology of southern Africa and Antarctica
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 308(1): 91 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
S. Baba, M. Owada, and K. Shiraishi
Contrasting metamorphic P-T path between Schirmacher Hills and Muhlig-Hofmannfjella, central Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2008; 308(1): 401 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
X. Liu, Y. Zhao, G. Zhao, P. Jian, and G. Xu
Petrology and Geochronology of Granulites from the McKaskle Hills, Eastern Amery Ice Shelf, Antarctica, and Implications for the Evolution of the Prydz Belt
J. Petrology, August 1, 2007; 48(8): 1443 - 1470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the Geological SocietyHome page
E. G. Grosch, A. Bisnath, H. E. Frimmel, and W. S. Board
Geochemistry and tectonic setting of mafic rocks in western Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica: implications for the geodynamic evolution of the Proterozoic Maud Belt
Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2007; 164(2): 465 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeologyHome page
E. Schmadicke and T.M. Will
First evidence of eclogite facies metamorphism in the Shackleton Range, Antarctica: Trace of a suture between East and West Gondwana?
Geology, March 1, 2006; 34(3): 133 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.