Journal of Petrology 2005 46(6):1081-1084; doi:10.1093/petrology/egi041
© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org
Petrogenesis of Proterozoic Lamproites and Kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India: a Reply
N. V. CHALAPATHI RAO1,*,
S. A. GIBSON1,
,
D. M. PYLE1,
A. P. DICKIN2 and
J. DAY1
1 DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, DOWNING STREET, CAMBRIDGE CB2 3EQ, UK
2 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, McMASTER UNIVERSITY, HAMILTON L8S 4M1, ONTARIO, CANADA
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Mid-Proterozoic kimberlites and lamproites from southern India
are some of the world's oldest known, small-fraction, volatile-rich,
silicate melts that, until recently, have remained poorly documented
in the international literature. The main aim of the work by
Chalapathi Rao
et al. (2004)

was to understand the tectono-magmatic
processes operating beneath the Dharwar Craton and Cuddapah
Basin during the Mid-Proterozoic. To constrain (1) the melt
generation processes and (2) the nature of the source regions
involved in the genesis of the small-fraction mantle melts it
was necessary for us to undertake detailed petrographic descriptions
and high-precision analyses of the mineral and bulk-rock chemistry
of Dharwar craton kimberlites and Cuddapah Basin lamproites.
The main emphasis of the paper by Chalapathi Rao
et al. (2004)
was not to classify rocks as kimberlites or lamproites, as Anil
Kumar & Gopalan (2005)

suggest, although this was made possible
by results from our detailed mineralogical
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
 |
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
|---|
Corresponding author. E-mail: sally@esc.cam.ac.uk

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?