Skip Navigation


Journal of Petrology Advance Access originally published online on September 3, 2007
Journal of Petrology 2007 48(10):1843-1873; doi:10.1093/petrology/egm041
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/10/1843    most recent
egm041v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aulbach, S.
Right arrow Articles by Doyle, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Origins of Xenolithic Eclogites and Pyroxenites from the Central Slave Craton, Canada

Sonja Aulbach1,*, Norman J. Pearson1, Suzanne Y. O'Reilly1 and Buddy J. Doyle2

1Gemoc arc National Key Centre, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia
2Lithosphere Services, 4009 Edinburgh Street, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5C 1R4

RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 27, 2006; ACCEPTED JULY 4, 2007


   Abstract

Major- and trace-element and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopic compositions of garnet and clinopyroxene in kimberlite-borne eclogite and pyroxenite xenoliths were used to establish their origins and evolution in the subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath the central Slave Craton, Canada. The majority of eclogites can be assigned to three groups (high-Mg, high-Ca or low-Mg eclogites) that have distinct trace-element patterns. Although post-formation metasomatism involving high field strength element (HFSE) and light rare earth element (LREE) addition has partially obscured the primary compositional features of the high-Mg and high-Ca eclogites, trace-element features, such as unfractionated middle REE (MREE) to heavy REE (HREE) patterns suggestive of garnet-free residues and low Zr/Sm consistent with plagioclase accumulation, could indicate a subduction origin from a broadly gabbroic protolith. In this scenario, the low {sum}REE and small positive Eu anomalies of the high-Mg eclogites suggest more primitive, plagioclase-rich protoliths, whereas the high-Ca eclogites are proposed to have more evolved protoliths with higher (normative) clinopyroxene/plagioclase ratios plus trapped melt, consistent with their lower Mg-numbers, higher {sum}REE and absence of Eu anomalies. In contrast, the subchondritic Zr/Hf and positive slope in the HREE of the low-Mg eclogites are similar to Archaean second-stage melts and point to a previously depleted source for their precursors. Low ratios of fluid-mobile to less fluid-mobile elements and of LREE to HREE are consistent with dehydration and partial melt loss for some eclogites. The trace-element characteristics of the different eclogite types translate into lower {varepsilon}Nd for high-Mg eclogites than for low-Mg eclogites. Within the low-Mg group, samples that show evidence for metasomatic enrichment in LREE and HFSE have lower {varepsilon}Nd and {varepsilon}Hf than a sample that was apparently not enriched, pointing to long-term evolution at their respective parent–daughter ratios. Garnet and clinopyroxene in pyroxenites show different major-element relationships from those in eclogites, such as an opposite CaO–Na2O trend and the presence of a CaO–Cr2O3 trend, independent of whether or not opx is part of the assemblage. Therefore, these two rock types are probably not related by fractionation processes. The presence of opx in about half of the samples precludes direct crystallization from eclogite-derived melts. They probably formed from hybridized melts that reacted with the peridotitic mantle.

KEY WORDS: eclogites; pyroxenite xenoliths; mantle xenoliths; eclogite trace elements; eclogite Sr isotopes; eclogite Hf isotopes; eclogite Nd isotopes


*Corresponding author. Present address: Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E3, Canada. Telephone: +61 2 9850 8953. Fax: +61 2 9850 8943. E-mail: saulbach{at}els.mq.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
C.-W. Chen, S. Rondenay, Rob. L. Evans, and D. B. Snyder
Geophysical Detection of Relict Metasomatism from an Archean (~3.5 Ga) Subduction Zone
Science, November 20, 2009; 326(5956): 1089 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PetrologyHome page
J. Konzett and D. J. Frost
The High P-T Stability of Hydroxyl-apatite in Natural and Simplified MORB--an Experimental Study to 15 GPa with Implications for Transport and Storage of Phosphorus and Halogens in Subduction Zones
J. Petrology, November 1, 2009; 50(11): 2043 - 2062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.