Skip Navigation

Journal of Petrology 2009 50(5):813-840; doi:10.1093/petrology/egp020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tegner, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lesher, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Differentiation and Compaction in the Skaergaard Intrusion

Christian Tegner1,*, Peter Thy2, Marian B. Holness3, Jakob K. Jakobsen1,4 and Charles E. Lesher2

1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus, Høegh-Guldbergs GADE 2, DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark
2Department of Geology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK
4Nordic Volcanological Centre, Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland

RECEIVED SEPTEMBER 24, 2007; ACCEPTED MARCH 25, 2009


   Abstract

Igneous differentiation processes are constrained from bulk compositions, densities and mineral modes of 116 cumulate gabbro samples in a new reference profile through the Layered Series of the Skaergaard intrusion, East Greenland. The stratigraphic distribution of P, U and Rb in cumulates and residual magma, modeled by Rayleigh fractionation, constrains the final porosities or trapped liquid contents to 30–52% in LZa troctolites, decreasing to 4–12% at the top of LZb olivine-gabbros and remaining low (1–13%; 4·6% on average) in the oxide-gabbros of LZc, MZ and UZ. Local variations in trapped liquid content are associated with modal layering: leucocratic, low-density rocks have higher proportions of trapped melt than adjacent melanocratic, high-density rocks. These observations are explained by varying degrees of compaction. Compaction was most important after the onset of Fe–Ti oxide crystallization because of the high densities of the crystal matrix. Here computed rates of compaction exceed the rate of crystal accumulation in layers that are metres to a few tens of metres thick. In the basal section (LZa) the crystal pile was too thin and the density of the crystal matrix too low to drive the rate of compaction above the high rate of crystal accumulation promoted by initial cooling through the intrusion floor. In the overlying section (LZb) the efficiency of compaction gradually increased as a result of thickening of the crystal pile and lowering of the rate of crystal accumulation. The modeling constrains the P2O5 content of the residual magma to ~1·7 wt % at the level of apatite-in, suggesting that the magma contained ~49 wt % SiO2 and followed a trend of iron enrichment. Compaction of the uppermost metres to tens of metres of crystal mush at the top of the cumulate pile was an efficient means of differentiation and resulted in layers with variable final porosities and trace element contents depending on the mineralogy and density of the crystal matrix.

KEY WORDS: layered intrusion; compaction; magma; differentiation; crystallization


*Corresponding author. E-mail: christian.tegner{at}geo.au.dk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
P. Thy, C. Tegner, and C. E. Lesher
Liquidus temperatures of the Skaergaard magma
American Mineralogist, October 1, 2009; 94(10): 1371 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.