Journal of Petrology Advance Access published online on April 15, 2005
Journal of Petrology, doi:10.1093/petrology/egi030
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA, CA 93106-9630, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Xenoliths of subducted crustal origin hosted by Miocene ultrapotassic igneous rocks in the southern Pamir provide important new information regarding the geological processes accompanying tectonism during the Indo-Eurasian collision. Four types have been studied: sanidine eclogites (omphacite, garnet, sanidine, quartz, biotite, kyanite), felsic granulites (garnet, quartz, sanidine and kyanite), basaltic eclogites (omphacite and garnet), and a glimmerite (biotite, clinopyroxene and sanidine). Apatite, rutile and carbonate are the most abundant minor phases. Hydrous phases (biotite and phengite in felsic granulites and basaltic eclogites, amphiboles in mafic and sanidine eclogites) and plagioclase form minor inclusions in garnet or kyanite. Solid-phase thermobarometry reveals recrystallization at mainly ultrahigh temperatures of 1000-1100°C and near-ultrahigh pressures of 2·5-2·8 GPa. Textures, parageneses and mineral compositions suggest derivation of the xenoliths from subducted basaltic, tonalitic and pelitic crust that experienced high-pressure dehydration melting, K-rich metasomatism, and solid-state re-equilibration. The timing of these processes is constrained by zircon ages from the xenoliths and 40Ar/39Ar ages of the host volcanic rocks to 57-11 Ma. These xenoliths reveal that deeply subducted crust may undergo extensive dehydration-driven partial melting, density-driven differentiation and disaggregation, and sequestration within the mantle. These processes may also contribute to the alkaline volcanism observed in continent-collision zones.
Received June 24, 2004
Accepted February 16, 2005
Article
Near-Ultrahigh Pressure Processing of Continental Crust: Miocene Crustal Xenoliths from the Pamir
2 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS, UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST, BUCHAREST, 70139, ROMANIA
3 GEOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE TAJIK ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, 734063, DUSHANBE, TAJIKISTAN
4 INSTITUT FÜR GEOWISSENSCHAFTEN, TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERGAKADEMIE FREIBERG, 09599 FREIBERG, GERMANY
5 DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES, 685 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE, BOSTON UNIVERSITY, BOSTON, MA 02215, USA
6 DEPARTMENT OF GEOSCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, TUCSON, AZ 85721, USA
7 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA, ATHENS, GA 30602, USA
8 GEOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, STANFORD UNIVERSITY, STANFORD, CA 94305-2115, USA
BRADLEY HACKER, E-mail: hacker{at}geol.ucsb.edu
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. C. Robinson, A. Yin, C. E. Manning, T. M. Harrison, S.-H. Zhang, and X.-F. Wang Cenozoic evolution of the eastern Pamir: Implications for strain-accommodation mechanisms at the western end of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen GSA Bulletin, July 1, 2007; 119(7-8): 882 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. SEARLE and R. J. PHILLIPS Relationships between right-lateral shear along the Karakoram fault and metamorphism, magmatism, exhumation and uplift: evidence from the K2-Gasherbrum-Pangong ranges, north Pakistan and Ladakh Journal of the Geological Society, March 1, 2007; 164(2): 439 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|