Skip Navigation



Journal of Petrology Advance Access published online on October 9, 2007

Journal of Petrology, doi:10.1093/petrology/egm057
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
48/11/2211    most recent
egm057v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coogan, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Contrasting Cooling Rates in the Lower Oceanic Crust at Fast- and Slow-spreading Ridges Revealed by Geospeedometry

L. A. Coogan1,*, G. R. T. Jenkin2 and R. N. Wilson2

1School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Petch Building, University of Victoria, PO Box 3055 STN CSC, V8W 3p6, Victoria, B.C., Canada
2Department of Geology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK

Received October 23, 2006; Revised typescript accepted September 6, 2007


   Abstract

Two approaches to determining the high-temperature (~1000°C to ~600°C) cooling rate of the lower oceanic crust and upper mantle are presented and critically evaluated. The first is based on the down-temperature diffusive exchange of Ca between olivine and clinopyroxene. The second, less well-constrained, approach is based on the down-temperature diffusive exchange of Mg and Fe between olivine and spinel. Cooling rates based on olivine–spinel geospeedometry are approximately an order of magnitude faster than those from Ca-in-olivine geospeedometry. In contrast, cooling rates derived from thermochronology and remanent magnetism are approximately an order of magnitude slower than those derived by Ca-in-olivine geospeedometry; this is probably because they record cooling at lower temperatures. Using the Ca-in-olivine geospeedometer, the cooling rate of samples from the lower oceanic crust and upper oceanic mantle formed in the Oman ophiolite and in the three main ocean basins has been determined. Samples from the lower oceanic crust formed at fast-spreading ridges show a large decrease in cooling rate between the top and base of the gabbroic section, with most of the variation occurring within the upper kilometre. This is consistent with vertical heat loss (within the crustal frame of reference) dominating the thermal evolution at fast-spreading ridges. Samples from Ocean Drilling Program Hole 735B, which formed at the slow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge, show no variation in cooling rate over 1500 m depth range and cooled substantially faster than rocks from the deeper portion of the gabbros in the Oman ophiolite, where the change in cooling rate with depth is limited. These observations are consistent with heat loss from small plutons emplaced in cool lithosphere at the slow-spreading ridge. Alternatively, they could be explained by cooling through the Ca-in-olivine closure interval during uplift towards the surface.

KEY WORDS: geospeedometry; lower oceanic crust; Hess Deep; Pito Deep; ODP Hole 735B; ODP Leg 153


*Corresponding author. Telephone: (1) 250 472 4018. E-mail: lacoogan{at}uvic.ca


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistryHome page
F. Costa, R. Dohmen, and S. Chakraborty
Time Scales of Magmatic Processes from Modeling the Zoning Patterns of Crystals
Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2008; 69(1): 545 - 594.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.